Literature DB >> 22919008

A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer.

D M L Tse1, N Joshi, E M Anderson, M Brady, F V Gleeson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the principle of supporting radiologists by using a computer algorithm to quantitatively analyse MRI morphological features used by radiologists to predict the presence or absence of metastatic disease in local lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
METHODS: A computer algorithm was developed to extract and quantify the following morphological features from MR images: chemical shift artefact; relative mean signal intensity; signal heterogeneity; and nodal size (volume or maximum diameter). Computed predictions on nodal involvement were generated using quantified features in isolation or in combinations. Accuracies of the predictions were assessed against a set of 43 lymph nodes, determined by radiologists as benign (20 nodes) or malignant (23 nodes).
RESULTS: Predictions using combinations of quantified features were more accurate than predictions using individual features (0.67-0.86 vs 0.58-0.77, respectively). The algorithm was more accurate when three-dimensional images were used (0.58-0.86) than when only middle image slices (two-dimensional) were used (0.47-0.72). Maximum node diameter was more accurate than node volume in representing the nodal size feature; combinations including maximum node diameter gave accuracies up to 0.91.
CONCLUSION: We have developed a computer algorithm that can support radiologists by quantitatively analysing morphological features of lymph nodes on MRI in the context of rectal cancer nodal staging. We have shown that this algorithm can combine these quantitative indices to generate computed predictions of nodal status which closely match radiological assessment. This study provides support for the feasibility of computer-assisted reading in nodal staging, but requires further refinement and validation with larger data sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22919008      PMCID: PMC3487059          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/13374146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  The segmentation of colorectal MRI images.

Authors:  Niranjan Joshi; Sarah Bond; Michael Brady
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  B Glimelius; J Oliveira
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of nodal enhancement pattern of rectal cancer at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; Christopher George; Louis Temple; David J Collins; Paul Toomey; Ashraf Raja; Nicholas Bett; Sami Farhat; Janet E Husband; Gina Brown
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.

Authors:  Gina Brown; Catherine J Richards; Michael W Bourne; Robert G Newcombe; Andrew G Radcliffe; Nicholas S Dallimore; Geraint T Williams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet-Mesrur Halefoglu; Sadik Yildirim; Omer Avlanmis; Damlanur Sakiz; Adil Baykan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth L Meredith; Sarah E Hoffe; David Shibata
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takayuki Akasu; Gen Iinuma; Masashi Takawa; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Yukio Muramatsu; Noriyuki Moriyama
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary embolism: performance evaluation in consensus with experienced and inexperienced chest radiologists.

Authors:  Christoph Engelke; Stephan Schmidt; Annemarie Bakai; Florian Auer; Katharina Marten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Management of early rectal cancer.

Authors:  M G Tytherleigh; B F Warren; N J McC Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Value of ADC measurements for nodal staging after chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer-a per lesion validation study.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Robert G Riedl; Frans C H Bakers; Jan L Verwoerd; Alfons G H Kessels; Guido Lammering; Carla Boetes; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  6 in total

1.  Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jörn Gröne; Florian N Loch; Matthias Taupitz; C Schmidt; Martin E Kreis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Deep transfer learning based on magnetic resonance imaging can improve the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Li; Yang Zhou; Peng Wang; Henan Zhao; Xinxin Wang; Na Tang; Kuan Luan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

Review 3.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A deep learning nomogram kit for predicting metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Lei Ding; Guangwei Liu; Xianxiang Zhang; Shanglong Liu; Shuai Li; Zhengdong Zhang; Yuting Guo; Yun Lu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergei Bedrikovetski; Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata; Hidde M Kroon; Warren Seow; Ryash Vather; Gustavo Carneiro; James W Moore; Tarik Sammour
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Yang Zhang; Mingtian Wei; Xuyang Yang; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.