Literature DB >> 20489069

Diagnostic accuracy of nodal enhancement pattern of rectal cancer at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes.

Dow-Mu Koh1, Christopher George, Louis Temple, David J Collins, Paul Toomey, Ashraf Raja, Nicholas Bett, Sami Farhat, Janet E Husband, Gina Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern of nodal enhancement at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) in the nodal classification of rectal cancer in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent prospective evaluation with 3-mm axial T2-weighted and USPIO-enhanced T2*-weighted MRI before surgery. Mesorectal nodes visible at in vivo MRI were independently scored by two radiologists as malignant or nonmalignant according to morphologic criteria (irregular nodal contour, heterogeneous signal intensity) on T2-weighted MR images and according to USPIO enhancement pattern on T2*-weighted MR images. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of morphologic and USPIO criteria in identification of malignancy in the pathologically matched mesorectal nodes were compared by use of the McNemar test. Interobserver agreement was compared by use of kappa statistics.
RESULTS: After surgery, radiologic-pathologic comparison of 126 mesorectal nodes (116 benign, 10 malignant) was possible. Use of morphologic criteria resulted in an average sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 35-88%); specificity, 75% (67-83%); positive predictive value, 19% (8-34%); and negative predictive value, 96% (91-99%). Use of USPIO criteria resulted in an average sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 35-88%); specificity, 93% (87-96%); positive predictive value, 43% (21-67%); and negative predictive value, 97% (92-99%). Use of USPIO MRI improved diagnostic specificity for both observers (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement was fair for morphologic criteria (kappa = 0.39) but good for USPIO criteria (kappa = 0.68).
CONCLUSION: Use of the pattern of USPIO enhancement had higher diagnostic specificity than but the same sensitivity as morphologic findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20489069     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  22 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary management in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Asunción Hervás Morón; María Luisa García de Paredes; Eduardo Lobo Martínez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Defining the role of modern imaging techniques in assessing lymph nodes for metastasis in cancer: evolving contribution of PET in this setting.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Drew A Torigian; Babak Saboury; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of treatment results between surgery alone, preoperative short-course radiotherapy, or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chung-Hung Yeh; Miao-Fen Chen; Chia-Hsuan Lai; Wen-Shih Huang; Steve P Lee; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer.

Authors:  D M L Tse; N Joshi; E M Anderson; M Brady; F V Gleeson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The impact of lymph node size to predict nodal metastasis in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Im-Kyung Kim; Jeonghyun Kang; Beom Jin Lim; Seung-Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tyler J Fraum; Joseph W Owen; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Avanish P Saklani; Sung Uk Bae; Amy Clayton; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Rectal cancer: An evidence-based update for primary care providers.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Mary R Kwaan; Robert D Madoff; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update.

Authors:  Umit Tapan; Mustafa Ozbayrak; Servet Tatlı
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Yang Zhang; Mingtian Wei; Xuyang Yang; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.