Literature DB >> 22918239

A novel G1 checkpoint mediated by the p57 CDK inhibitor and p38 SAPK promotes cell survival upon stress.

Manel Joaquin, Albert Gubern, Francesc Posas.   

Abstract

Comment on: Joaquin M, et al. EMBO J 2012; 31:2952-64.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22918239      PMCID: PMC3466532          DOI: 10.4161/cc.21840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


Eukaryotic cells have developed sophisticated devices to constantly monitor changes in the extracellular environment and to orchestrate a proper cellular response. Among the most conserved signaling modules throughout evolution are the mitogen-activated, protein kinase (MAPK) cascades. A prototypical family of MAPKs that respond to stress is the p38 stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK). In mammals, p38 SAPKs are activated by external stimuli, such as cytokines, infection, oxidative stress, heat shock, DNA damage and osmostress, and regulate biological processes such as immune response, inflammation, development, proliferation and survival. Regardless, the sensor mechanism engaged, signaling converges on p38, which will mediate an adaptive response to stress. p38 has been regarded to act as a tumor suppressor capable of controlling cell proliferation through the activation of different cell cycle checkpoints. Upon DNA damage, p38 mediates a G2/M checkpoint involving the downstream kinase MK2. MK2 phosphorylates Cdc25, which creates a docking site for 14-3-3 proteins that will retain Cdc25 into the cell cytoplasm, thus preventing Cdc2-cyclin B dephosphorylation and activation., Genotoxic stresses also contribute to G1/S arrest through the stabilization of the CDK inhibitors p21Cip1 and p27Kip1., Despite the p38 relevance on cell cycle control, the mechanisms by which this SAPK regulate cell cycle are not yet fully understood. A recent study has shown that exposing mammalian cells to osmostress resulted in a strong G1 delay, suggesting the existence of an osmostress-regulated checkpoint. p38−/− cells were not able to arrest properly, indicating that this G1 checkpoint relied on p38. Cell cycle progression throughout G1 is controlled by G1 cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which activity is, in turn, regulated by several CDK inhibitors (CDKis). In yeast, G1 progression upon osmostress by the p38/Hog1 SAPK is exerted by downregulating cyclin expression and the direct targeting of the Sic1 CDKi., In mammals, osmostress downregulated Cdk2-CyclinA/E activity in a p38-dependent manner. Therefore, p38 might be regulating CDK2 activity through the targeting of CDKis. p38 was able to directly phosphorylate the CDKi p57Kip2 at T143 both in vitro and in vivo. This particular site is located in a central region of p57 not shared by p21 or p27. Cells genetically lacking p57Kip2 failed to properly arrest at G1 upon osmostress. Osmostress-induced p57Kip2 phosphorylation neither affected its protein half-life nor its nuclear localization. Instead, p57Kip2 phosphorylation at T143 increased its protein affinity toward cyclin A/Cdk2 complexes in vitro in contrast to a non-phosphorylable p57Kip2 mutant (T143A). Altogether, CDK2 activity might be differentially regulated upon p57Kip2 phosphorylation. Indeed, p57Kip2 inhibited Cdk2-cyclin A activity in a dose-dependent manner, and this was further increased upon phosphorylation at T143. The reintroduction of wild-type p57Kip2 into p57−/− cells fully rescued the osmostress-induced G1 checkpoint and reestablished in vivo CDK2 activity regulation. Importantly, the T143A mutant was unable to fully restore the osmostress-induced G1 checkpoint and failed to regulate in vivo CDK2 activity. Therefore, p38 is regulating a novel G1 checkpoint by directly targeting the CDKi p57Kip2 (Fig. 1). Since p38 responds to a number of environmental insults, it was possible that such a G1 checkpoint might be important for proper cell adaptation to general stresses. Thus, p38−/− and p57−/− cells underwent programmed cell death after the exposure to different insults such as osmostic shock, oxidative stress and ionomycin. Notably p57−/− cell viability was rescued by reintroducing wild-type p57, but not by the T143A mutant, pointing out the biological relevance of this novel phosphorylation site to arrest cell cycle in response to stress.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram depicting the mechanism by which p38 SAPK activation promotes G1 cell cycle arrest through p57Kip2 phosphorylation. Transition from G1 to S phase requires Cdk2-cyclinE/A activity. Upon an environmental stress, p38 SAPK becomes transiently activated and phosphorylates the T143 of the CDKi p57Kip2. p57 phosphorylation increases its affinity toward Cdk2-cyclin E/A complexes, which become inactivated and impose a G1 delay. Activation of this G1 checkpoint is essential for proper cell adaptation and survival to stress.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram depicting the mechanism by which p38 SAPK activation promotes G1 cell cycle arrest through p57Kip2 phosphorylation. Transition from G1 to S phase requires Cdk2-cyclinE/A activity. Upon an environmental stress, p38 SAPK becomes transiently activated and phosphorylates the T143 of the CDKi p57Kip2. p57 phosphorylation increases its affinity toward Cdk2-cyclin E/A complexes, which become inactivated and impose a G1 delay. Activation of this G1 checkpoint is essential for proper cell adaptation and survival to stress. Surprisingly, neither p21 nor p27 compensated for the lack of p57. Although p21 was found to be upregulated in the absence of p57, it was unable to regulate the G1 phase and cell viability upon stress. Additionally, p27−/− cell viability was not compromised upon cell stress, indicating that p57 is just enough to integrate a broad range of cell stresses in a p38-dependent manner. Both p21 and p27 are p38 targets. Then, why do these CDKs not contribute to cell survival? One explanation would be the type of stress. UV and DNA damaging agents activate the p53, ATM/ATR as well as the p38 SAPK pathways, resulting in the regulation of both p21 and p27. In that scenario, p57 is not relevant, since UV-induced DNA damage did not affect p57−/− viability but strongly compromised p38−/− cell fitness. Also, downregulation of p38 substrates such as Cdt1 and MK2, which are involved in controlling S-phase and G2/M checkpoints, respectively, do not contribute to cell survival upon stress.,, Altogether, p38 and p57 impose a G1 cell cycle arrest to promote cell survival upon cell stresses. But why is so important to delay G1 cell cycle progression? We may speculate that to build up a proper cell adaptation response, cells need time to upregulate a specific set of genes. Indeed, stress-induced p38 controls the expression of many genes involved in cell proliferation as well as cell survival in a time-dependent manner. The relationship between cell cycle control and gene expression regulation has not been studied thoroughly, but delaying G1 progression might be a step necessary to upregulate the essential genes needed for cell adaptation before progressing into S phase.
  11 in total

1.  Stress-stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinases control the stability and activity of the Cdt1 DNA replication licensing factor.

Authors:  Srikripa Chandrasekaran; Ting Xu Tan; Jonathan R Hall; Jeanette Gowen Cook
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1.

Authors:  Xavier Escoté; Meritxell Zapater; Josep Clotet; Francesc Posas
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-19       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Time-dependent quantitative multicomponent control of the G₁-S network by the stress-activated protein kinase Hog1 upon osmostress.

Authors:  Miquel Àngel Adrover; Zhike Zi; Alba Duch; Jörg Schaber; Alberto González-Novo; Javier Jimenez; Mariona Nadal-Ribelles; Josep Clotet; Edda Klipp; Francesc Posas
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.192

4.  p53-deficient cells rely on ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage.

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Aaron S Aslanian; Jacqueline A Lees; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 5.  CDK inhibitors: cell cycle regulators and beyond.

Authors:  Arnaud Besson; Steven F Dowdy; James M Roberts
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 6.  Mechanisms and functions of p38 MAPK signalling.

Authors:  Ana Cuadrado; Angel R Nebreda
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  MAPKAP kinase-2 is a cell cycle checkpoint kinase that regulates the G2/M transition and S phase progression in response to UV irradiation.

Authors:  Isaac A Manke; Anhco Nguyen; Daniel Lim; Mary Q Stewart; Andrew E H Elia; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  p27Kip1 stabilization is essential for the maintenance of cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Myriam Cuadrado; Paula Gutierrez-Martinez; Aneta Swat; Angel R Nebreda; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase- and HuR-dependent stabilization of p21(Cip1) mRNA mediates the G(1)/S checkpoint.

Authors:  Vanesa Lafarga; Ana Cuadrado; Isabel Lopez de Silanes; Rocio Bengoechea; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Angel R Nebreda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The p57 CDKi integrates stress signals into cell-cycle progression to promote cell survival upon stress.

Authors:  Manel Joaquin; Albert Gubern; Daniel González-Nuñez; E Josué Ruiz; Isabel Ferreiro; Eulalia de Nadal; Angel R Nebreda; Francesc Posas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  7 in total

1.  Repetitive magnetic stimulation promotes neural stem cells proliferation by upregulating MiR-106b in vitro.

Authors:  Hua Liu; Xiao-Hua Han; Hong Chen; Cai-Xia Zheng; Yi Yang; Xiao-Lin Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  An RB insensitive to CDK regulation.

Authors:  Manel Joaquin; Eulàlia de Nadal; Francesc Posas
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2016-12-14

3.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Induces Cell Cycle-Dependent Neuronal Apoptosis in Mice.

Authors:  Vijayprakash Manickam; Vasanth Dhakshinamoorthy; Ekambaram Perumal
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  Inhibition of the HIF-1 Survival Pathway as a Strategy to Augment Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy.

Authors:  Mark J de Keijzer; Daniel J de Klerk; Lianne R de Haan; Robert T van Kooten; Leonardo P Franchi; Lionel M Dias; Tony G Kleijn; Diederick J van Doorn; Michal Heger
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Osmostress-induced gene expression--a model to understand how stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) regulate transcription.

Authors:  Eulàlia de Nadal; Francesc Posas
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  Quercetin and Cisplatin combined treatment altered cell cycle and mitogen activated protein kinase expressions in malignant mesotelioma cells.

Authors:  Asuman Demiroglu-Zergeroglu; Emel Ergene; Nurettin Ayvali; Victor Kuete; Hulya Sivas
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.659

7.  The regulation of Net1/Cdc14 by the Hog1 MAPK upon osmostress unravels a new mechanism regulating mitosis.

Authors:  Javier Jiménez; Ethel Queralt; Francesc Posas; Eulàlia de Nadal
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.534

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.