OBJECTIVE: Although brain swelling is an important cause of neurological deterioration, real time measurement of brain edema does not currently exist. Because thermal conductivity is proportional to percentage water content, we used the thermal conductivity constant to estimate brain water content (BWC). METHODS: Between June 2008 and November 2010, 36 comatose brain-injured patients underwent cerebral blood flow monitoring using a thermal diffusion probe in our neurocritical care unit. BWC was estimated hourly utilizing the measured thermal conductivity and the known temperature-adjusted thermal conductivity of water. In vitro experiments were performed to validate this formula using agar, glycerol, and water mixtures with different water content. RESULTS: Thermal conductivity was highly correlated (R(2) = 0.99) and estimated water content was well correlated with actual water content (mean difference, 0.58%) in the in vitro preparations. The majority of the 36 patients (median age, 57 years; 44% female) had subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 14) or cardiac arrest (n = 9). Initial BWC at the time of monitoring ranged from 67.3 to 85.5%. Brain regions appearing edematous on computed tomography showed higher estimated BWC than normal-appearing brain regions (79.1 vs 70.2%; p < 0.01). Bolus osmotherapy (20% mannitol or 23.4% hypertonic saline) decreased BWC from 77.2 ± 0.7% (mean ± standard error) at baseline to 76.1 ± 0.5% at 1 hour, 76.5 ± 0.3% at 2 hours, and 76.7 ± 0.2% at 3 hours (all p ≤ 0.03). INTERPRETATION: Real time monitoring of BWC is feasible using thermal conductivity. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical utility of this technique.
OBJECTIVE: Although brain swelling is an important cause of neurological deterioration, real time measurement of brain edema does not currently exist. Because thermal conductivity is proportional to percentage water content, we used the thermal conductivity constant to estimate brain water content (BWC). METHODS: Between June 2008 and November 2010, 36 comatose brain-injured patients underwent cerebral blood flow monitoring using a thermal diffusion probe in our neurocritical care unit. BWC was estimated hourly utilizing the measured thermal conductivity and the known temperature-adjusted thermal conductivity of water. In vitro experiments were performed to validate this formula using agar, glycerol, and water mixtures with different water content. RESULTS: Thermal conductivity was highly correlated (R(2) = 0.99) and estimated water content was well correlated with actual water content (mean difference, 0.58%) in the in vitro preparations. The majority of the 36 patients (median age, 57 years; 44% female) had subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 14) or cardiac arrest (n = 9). Initial BWC at the time of monitoring ranged from 67.3 to 85.5%. Brain regions appearing edematous on computed tomography showed higher estimated BWC than normal-appearing brain regions (79.1 vs 70.2%; p < 0.01). Bolus osmotherapy (20% mannitol or 23.4% hypertonicsaline) decreased BWC from 77.2 ± 0.7% (mean ± standard error) at baseline to 76.1 ± 0.5% at 1 hour, 76.5 ± 0.3% at 2 hours, and 76.7 ± 0.2% at 3 hours (all p ≤ 0.03). INTERPRETATION: Real time monitoring of BWC is feasible using thermal conductivity. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical utility of this technique.
Authors: Lauren H Sansing; Elena A Kaznatcheeva; Candice J Perkins; Eugene Komaroff; Frederick B Gutman; George C Newman Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Pippa G Al-Rawi; Ming-Yuan Tseng; Hugh K Richards; Jurgens Nortje; Ivan Timofeev; Basil F Matta; Peter J Hutchinson; Peter J Kirkpatrick Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Dominic A Siler; Yosef A Berlow; Ayaka Kukino; Catherine M Davis; Jonathan W Nelson; Marjorie R Grafe; Hirohisa Ono; Justin S Cetas; Martin Pike; Nabil J Alkayed Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Eric M Liotta; Bryan D Lizza; Anna L Romanova; James C Guth; Michael D Berman; Timothy J Carroll; Brandon Francis; Daniel Ganger; Daniela P Ladner; Matthew B Maas; Andrew M Naidech Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Ricardo Loução; Zaheer Abbas; Vincent Gras; Markus Zimmermann; N J Shah Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Jan Claassen; Shah Atiqur Rahman; Yuxiao Huang; Hans-Peter Frey; J Michael Schmidt; David Albers; Cristina Maria Falo; Soojin Park; Sachin Agarwal; E Sander Connolly; Samantha Kleinberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mario Kofler; Alois Schiefecker; Ronny Beer; Florian Sohm; Gregor Broessner; Paul Rhomberg; Peter Lackner; Bettina Pfausler; Claudius Thomé; Erich Schmutzhard; Raimund Helbok Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Ryan L Hoiland; Philip N Ainslie; Cheryl L Wellington; Jennifer Cooper; Sophie Stukas; Sonny Thiara; Denise Foster; Nicholas A Fergusson; Edward M Conway; David K Menon; Peter Gooderham; Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen; Donald E Griesdale; Mypinder S Sekhon Journal: Circ Res Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 17.367