Literature DB >> 26308431

23.4% Saline Decreases Brain Tissue Volume in Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy as Assessed by a Quantitative CT Marker.

Eric M Liotta1, Bryan D Lizza, Anna L Romanova, James C Guth, Michael D Berman, Timothy J Carroll, Brandon Francis, Daniel Ganger, Daniela P Ladner, Matthew B Maas, Andrew M Naidech.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral edema is common in severe hepatic encephalopathy and may be life threatening. Bolus 23.4% hypertonic saline improves surveillance neuromonitoring scores, although its mechanism of action is not clearly established. We investigated the hypothesis that bolus hypertonic saline decreases cerebral edema in severe hepatic encephalopathy utilizing a quantitative technique to measure brain and cerebrospinal fluid volume changes.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of serial CT scans, and clinical data for a case-control series were performed.
SETTING: ICUs of a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with severe hepatic encephalopathy treated with 23.4% hypertonic saline and control patients who did not receive 23.4% hypertonic saline.
INTERVENTIONS: 23.4% hypertonic saline bolus administration.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used clinically obtained CT scans to measure volumes of the ventricles, intracranial cerebrospinal fluid, and brain using a previously validated semiautomated technique (Analyze Direct, Overland Park, KS). Volumes before and after 23.4% hypertonic saline were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test. Associations among total cerebrospinal fluid volume, ventricular volume, serum sodium, and Glasgow Coma Scale scores were assessed using Spearman rank correlation test. Eleven patients with 18 administrations of 23.4% hypertonic saline met inclusion criteria. Total cerebrospinal fluid (median, 47.6 mL [35.1-69.4 mL] to 61.9 mL [47.7-87.0 mL]; p < 0.001) and ventricular volumes (median, 8.0 mL [6.9-9.5 mL] to 9.2 mL [7.8-11.9 mL]; p = 0.002) increased and Glasgow Coma Scale scores improved (median, 4 [3-6] to 7 [6-9]; p = 0.008) after 23.4% hypertonic saline. In contrast, total cerebrospinal fluid and ventricular volumes decreased in untreated control patients. Serum sodium increase was associated with increase in total cerebrospinal fluid volume (r = 0.83, p < 0.001), and change in total cerebrospinal fluid volume was associated with ventricular volume change (r = 0.86; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Total cerebrospinal fluid and ventricular volumes increased after 23.4% hypertonic saline, consistent with a reduction in brain tissue volume. Total cerebrospinal fluid and ventricular volume change may be useful quantitative measures to assess cerebral edema in severe hepatic encephalopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26308431      PMCID: PMC5243943          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  29 in total

1.  The Monro-Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion.

Authors:  B Mokri
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VII. Intracranial pressure monitoring technology.

Authors:  Susan L Bratton; Randall M Chestnut; Jamshid Ghajar; Flora F McConnell Hammond; Odette A Harris; Roger Hartl; Geoffrey T Manley; Andrew Nemecek; David W Newell; Guy Rosenthal; Joost Schouten; Lori Shutter; Shelly D Timmons; Jamie S Ullman; Walter Videtta; Jack E Wilberger; David W Wright
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Reversal of transtentorial herniation with hypertonic saline.

Authors:  M A Koenig; M Bryan; J L Lewin; M A Mirski; R G Geocadin; R D Stevens
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Serial determinations of cerebral water content by magnetic resonance imaging after an infusion of hypertonic saline.

Authors:  A Bacher; J Wei; M R Grafe; M J Quast; M H Zornow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Hyperosmolar therapy for raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Allan H Ropper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Increased brain volume among good grade patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Results from the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) study.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Shahram Majidi; Waqas I Gilani; Yuko Y Palesch; Renee Martin; Jill Novitzke; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Asad Ehtisham; Joshua N Goldstein; Jawad F Kirmani; Haitham M Hussein; M Fareed K Suri; Nauman Tariq
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Effect of hypertonic saline concentration on cerebral and visceral organ water in an uninjured rodent model.

Authors:  Thomas J Toung; Paul Nyquist; Marek A Mirski
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jack E Zimmerman; Andrew A Kramer; Douglas S McNair; Fern M Malila
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Surveillance neuroimaging and neurologic examinations affect care for intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Matthew B Maas; Neil F Rosenberg; Adam R Kosteva; Rebecca M Bauer; James C Guth; Eric M Liotta; Shyam Prabhakaran; Andrew M Naidech
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Hepatic encephalopathy: effects of liver failure on brain function.

Authors:  Vicente Felipo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  8 in total

1.  Serum osmolality, cerebrospinal fluid specific gravity and overt hepatic encephalopathy severity in patients with liver failure.

Authors:  Eric M Liotta; Constantine J Karvellas; Minjee Kim; Ayush Batra; Andrew Naidech; Shyam Prabhakaran; Farzaneh A Sorond; W Taylor Kimberly; Matthew B Maas
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.828

Review 2.  Cerebral edema and liver disease: Classic perspectives and contemporary hypotheses on mechanism.

Authors:  Eric M Liotta; W Taylor Kimberly
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Automated quantitative assessment of cerebral edema after ischemic stroke using CSF volumetrics.

Authors:  Rajat Dhar
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Reduction in Cerebrospinal Fluid Volume as an Early Quantitative Biomarker of Cerebral Edema After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Rajat Dhar; Yasheng Chen; Ali Hamzehloo; Atul Kumar; Laura Heitsch; June He; Ling Chen; Agnieszka Slowik; Daniel Strbian; Jin-Moo Lee
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Osmotic Shifts, Cerebral Edema, and Neurologic Deterioration in Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Authors:  Eric Michael Liotta; Anna L Romanova; Bryan D Lizza; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Minjee Kim; Brandon Francis; Rajbeer Singh Sangha; Timothy J Carroll; Daniel Ganger; Daniela P Ladner; Andrew M Naidech; James J Paparello; Shyam Prabhakaran; Farzaneh A Sorond; Matthew B Maas
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Cerebral Herniation from Hyperammonemic Cerebral Edema: A Potentially Reversible Neurological Emergency.

Authors:  Andrea Loggini; Raisa C Martinez; Christopher L Kramer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Hyperammonemia: What Urea-lly Need to Know: Case Report of Severe Noncirrhotic Hyperammonemic Encephalopathy and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ruby Upadhyay; Thomas P Bleck; Katharina M Busl
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2016-09-21

8.  Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.

Authors:  Peng Lan; Shuo-Jia Wang; Qiu-Cheng Shi; Ying Fu; Qing-Ye Xu; Tao Chen; Yun-Xian Yu; Kong-Han Pan; Ling Lin; Jian-Cang Zhou; Yun-Song Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.