Literature DB >> 22915115

Evidence for hyperbolic temporal discounting of reward in control of movements.

Adrian M Haith1, Thomas R Reppert, Reza Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Suppose that the purpose of a movement is to place the body in a more rewarding state. In this framework, slower movements may increase accuracy and therefore improve the probability of acquiring reward, but the longer durations of slow movements produce devaluation of reward. Here we hypothesize that the brain decides the vigor of a movement (duration and velocity) based on the expected discounted reward associated with that movement. We begin by showing that durations of saccades of varying amplitude can be accurately predicted by a model in which motor commands maximize expected discounted reward. This result suggests that reward is temporally discounted even in timescales of tens of milliseconds. One interpretation of temporal discounting is that the true objective of the brain is to maximize the rate of reward-which is equivalent to a specific form of hyperbolic discounting. A consequence of this idea is that the vigor of saccades should change as one alters the intertrial intervals between movements. We find experimentally that in healthy humans, as intertrial intervals are varied, saccade peak velocities and durations change on a trial-by-trial basis precisely as predicted by a model in which the objective is to maximize the rate of reward. Our results are inconsistent with theories in which reward is discounted exponentially. We suggest that there exists a single cost, rate of reward, which provides a unifying principle that may govern control of movements in timescales of milliseconds, as well as decision making in timescales of seconds to years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22915115      PMCID: PMC3462010          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0424-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  35 in total

1.  Modulation of saccadic eye movements by predicted reward outcome.

Authors:  Yoriko Takikawa; Reiko Kawagoe; Hideaki Itoh; Hiroyuki Nakahara; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye-hand coordination: saccades are faster when accompanied by a coordinated arm movement.

Authors:  Lawrence H Snyder; Jeffrey L Calton; Anthony R Dickinson; Bonnie M Lawrence
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.

Authors:  P M FITTS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-06

5.  Saccadic output is influenced by limb kinetics during eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Paul van Donkelaar; Ka-Chun Siu; Joshua Walterschied
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Immediate changes in anticipatory activity of caudate neurons associated with reversal of position-reward contingency.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.

Authors:  J Myerson; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Neural correlates of reward and attention in macaque area LIP.

Authors:  Michael S Bendiksby; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions.

Authors:  T Ljungberg; P Apicella; W Schultz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The main sequence of saccades optimizes speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Christopher M Harris; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  45 in total

1.  Vigor of movements and the cost of time in decision making.

Authors:  Jennie E S Choi; Pavan A Vaswani; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Explicit knowledge enhances motor vigor and performance: motivation versus practice in sequence tasks.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Martin A Lindquist; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Adaptation of naturally paced saccades.

Authors:  Michael J Gray; Annabelle Blangero; James P Herman; Josh Wallman; Mark R Harwood
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The duration of reaching movement is longer than predicted by minimum variance.

Authors:  Chunji Wang; Yupeng Xiao; Etienne Burdet; James Gordon; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Role of expected reward in frontal eye field during natural scene search.

Authors:  Joshua I Glaser; Daniel K Wood; Patrick N Lawlor; Pavan Ramkumar; Konrad P Kording; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Conservation law for self-paced movements.

Authors:  Dongsung Huh; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reward-dependent modulation of movement variability.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Jun Izawa; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The Role of Variability in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Ashesh K Dhawale; Maurice A Smith; Bence P Ölveczky
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Complementary Control over Habits and Behavioral Vigor by Phasic Activity in the Dorsolateral Striatum.

Authors:  Adam C G Crego; Fabián Štoček; Alec G Marchuk; James E Carmichael; Matthijs A A van der Meer; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.