| Literature DB >> 22912600 |
Naima Moustaid-Moussa1, Carol A Costello, Betty P Greer, Marsha Spence, Eugene Fitzhugh, Robert Muenchen, Nishan S Kalupahana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent findings from our research indicate that children participating in a creative afterschool program exhibit overall healthier lifestyle practices compared to the average US pediatric population. This observation led us to investigate the prevalence of overweight/obesity and lifestyle practices of their parents.Entities:
Keywords: BRFSS; diet; health behaviors; obesity; overweight; parents; physical activity
Year: 2012 PMID: 22912600 PMCID: PMC3422465 DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.17787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Female parents’ demographic characteristics and descriptive statistics (n=1,032)
| Frequency ( | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Race/ethnicity | ||
| White | 989 | 95.8 |
| Other | 43 | 4.2 |
| Annual household income | ||
| < $25,000 | 16 | 1.6 |
| $25,000–$50,000 | 80 | 7.8 |
| $50,001–$75,000 | 140 | 13.6 |
| $75,001–$100,000 | 231 | 22.4 |
| > $100,000 | 564 | 54.7 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 949 | 92.0 |
| Divorced | 49 | 4.8 |
| Widowed | 9 | 0.9 |
| Separated | 9 | 0.9 |
| Never married | 10 | 1.0 |
| Unmarried couple | 5 | 0.5 |
| Descriptive statistics | Mean (SD) | Range |
| Age in years | 43.56 (5.20) | 27–62 |
| BMI | 25.8 (5.60) | 15.81–54.92 |
| Years of education | 15.43 (1.09) | 12–16 |
| SOC_LADDER | 3.88 (1.44) | 1–10 |
| COM_LADDER | 3.99 (1.53) | 1–10 |
Fig. 1BMI distribution. A total of 1,032 female parents completed our surveys. BMI distribution in each of the following four categories is indicated: underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese.
Crosstabulation of parents and children weight status
| Children BMI percentile categories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Adult BMI categories | Underweight | Normal weight | Overweight | Obese | Total |
| Underweight count | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % within BMI categories | 25.0 | 75.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
| Normal count | 14 | 366 | 42 | 13 | 435 |
| % within BMI categories | 3.2 | 84.1 | 9.7 | 3.0 | 100.0 |
| Overweight count | 2 | 152 | 35 | 21 | 210 |
| % within BMI categories | 1.0 | 72.4 | 16.7 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
| Obese count | 0 | 83 | 26 | 27 | 136 |
| % within BMI categories | 0.0 | 61.0 | 19.1 | 19.9 | 100.0 |
| Total count | 18 | 607 | 103 | 61 | 789 |
| % within BMI categories | 2.3 | 76.9 | 13.1 | 7.7 | 100.0 |
Fig. 2Fat intake. A validated rapid screener was used to assess fat intake in a subset of the participants (n=681); *p<0.05.
Influence of BMI by physical activity, income, social ladder, education, and weight perception as independent variables
| Coefficients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| B | Std. error | Beta | t | Sig. | |
| (Constant) | 2.811 | 0.073 | 38.620 | 0.000 | |
| PA_TOTAL_ln | −0.022 | 0.004 | −0.101 | −5.105 | 0.000 |
| Income | −0.015 | 0.004 | −0.081 | −3.446 | 0.001 |
| SOC_LADDER | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.059 | 2.494 | 0.013 |
| Years of education | −0.009 | 0.004 | −0.049 | −2.261 | 0.024 |
| How do you describe your weight? | 0.195 | 0.005 | 0.741 | 37.355 | 0.000 |
Dependent variable: BMI_ln.
Pearson correlations (two-tailed for various variables)
| Correlations | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| BMI_ln | PA_TOT_ln | Income | SOC_LAD-DER | COM_LAD-DER | Education | Weight perception | |
| BMI_ln | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | 1 | −0.254 | −0.246 | 0.267 | 0.181 | −0.164 | 0.788 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| 1,017 | 951 | 1,017 | 1,017 | 1,015 | 1,016 | 1,016 |
| PA_TOT_ln | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | −0.254 | 1 | 0.077 | −0.132 | −0.104 | 0.006 | −0.186 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.860 | 0.000 | |
|
| 951 | 964 | 963 | 964 | 963 | 961 | 963 |
| Income | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | −0.246 | 0.077 | 1 | −0.541 | −0.292 | 0.399 | −0.148 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| 1,017 | 9,63 | 1,031 | 1,031 | 1,029 | 1,029 | 1,030 |
| SOC_LADDER | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | 0.267 | −0.132 | −0.541 | 1 | 0.614 | −0.410 | 0.188 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| 1,017 | 964 | 1,031 | 1,032 | 1,030 | 1,029 | 1,031 |
| COM_LADDER | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | 0.181 | −0.104 | −0.292 | 0.614 | 1 | −0.245 | 0.135 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| 1,015 | 963 | 1,029 | 1,030 | 1,030 | 1,027 | 1,029 |
| Education | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | −0.164 | 0.006 | 0.399 | −0.410 | −0.245 | 1 | −0.078 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.860 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.013 | |
|
| 1,016 | 961 | 1,029 | 1,029 | 1,027 | 1,029 | 1,028 |
| Weight perception | |||||||
| Pearson correlation | 0.788 | −0.186 | −0.148 | 0.188 | 0.135 | −0.078 | 1 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.013 | |
|
| 1,016 | 963 | 1,030 | 1,031 | 1,029 | 1,028 | 1,031 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).