Literature DB >> 22912447

Oral administration of a combination of select lactic acid bacteria strains to reduce the Salmonella invasion and inflammation of broiler chicks.

C-Y Chen1, H-Y Tsen, C-L Lin, B Yu, C-S Chen.   

Abstract

One-day-old chicks are susceptible to infection by strains of Salmonella enterica subspecies. Because multistrain probiotics are suggested to be more effective than monostrain probiotics due to the additive and synergistic effects, in this study, we prepared a multistrain formula A (MFA) consisting of 4 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains selected by enhancing the TNF-α production for mouse macrophage 264.7 cells. The antagonistic effect of this MFA against the cecal colonization, viscera invasiveness, as well as the inflammation of 1-d-old chicks challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium were then assayed. One-day-old chicks were fed with MFA from d 1 to d 3, and on d 4, chicks were challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium (200 μL, 10(6) cfu/mL). The livers, spleens, and cecal tonsils of chicks were then removed on d 3 and 6 postinfection. Compared with the multistrain formula B (MFB) which consisted of LAB strains selected at random, the efficacy of MFA to reduce the Salmonella counts recovered from the cecal tonsils, spleens, and livers of chicks were significantly higher. Moreover, when the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, interferon (IFN)-γ, and anti-inflmmatory cytokine, that is, IL-10, in cecal tonsils were measured by reverse-transcription real-time quantitative PCR; it was found that chicks fed with MFA for 3 d had lower levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IFN-γ and a higher level of IL-10 in the cecal tonsils of chicks as compared with those of the chicks fed with MFB or without LAB. These results suggest that multistrain probiotics consisting of LAB strains selected by immunomodulatory activity and adherence are more effective than those consisting of strains selected at random in antagonistic effect against Salmonella colonization, invasion, and the induced inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22912447     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

1.  Selection of Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus with Inhibitory Activity Against Salmonella and Fecal Coliform Bacteria.

Authors:  Mattika Abhisingha; Jureeporn Dumnil; Chetsadaporn Pitaksutheepong
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Alessandra De Cesare; Federico Sirri; Gerardo Manfreda; Paola Moniaci; Alberto Giardini; Marco Zampiga; Adele Meluzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Lactic acid bacteria decrease Salmonella enterica Javiana virulence and modulate host inflammation during infection of an intestinal epithelial cell line.

Authors:  Kristin M Burkholder; Dylan H Fletcher; Lauren Gileau; Arnold Kandolo
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Poultry body temperature contributes to invasion control through reduced expression of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 genes in Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis.

Authors:  Bryan Troxell; Nicholas Petri; Caitlyn Daron; Rafaela Pereira; Mary Mendoza; Hosni M Hassan; Matthew D Koci
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Long-term effects of oral tea polyphenols and Lactobacillus brevis M8 on biochemical parameters, digestive enzymes, and cytokines expression in broilers.

Authors:  Hua-li Li; Zong-jun Li; Zhong-shan Wei; Ting Liu; Xiao-zuo Zou; Yong Liao; Yu Luo
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 6.  A Review of the Effects and Production of Spore-Forming Probiotics for Poultry.

Authors:  Igor V Popov; Ammar Algburi; Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Maria S Mazanko; Vladimir Elisashvili; Anzhelica B Bren; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Elizaveta V Tkacheva; Vladimir I Trukhachev; Irina M Donnik; Yuri A Ivanov; Dmitry Rudoy; Alexey M Ermakov; Richard M Weeks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  The Gut Microbiota of Laying Hens and Its Manipulation with Prebiotics and Probiotics To Enhance Gut Health and Food Safety.

Authors:  Samiullah Khan; Robert J Moore; Dragana Stanley; Kapil K Chousalkar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  An updated review on probiotics as an alternative of antibiotics in poultry - A review.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar Yaqoob; Geng Wang; Minqi Wang
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2022-01-21

9.  Salmonella adhesion, invasion and cellular immune responses are differentially affected by iron concentrations in a combined in vitro gut fermentation-cell model.

Authors:  Alexandra Dostal; Mélanie Gagnon; Christophe Chassard; Michael Bruce Zimmermann; Liam O'Mahony; Christophe Lacroix
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identification of Lactobacillus strains with probiotic features from the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  M A Diaz; E M Bik; K P Carlin; S K Venn-Watson; E D Jensen; S E Jones; E P Gaston; D A Relman; J Versalovic
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.