Literature DB >> 22908619

Donor-conceived people's views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence.

Eric Blyth1, Marilyn Crawshaw, Lucy Frith, Caroline Jones.   

Abstract

This article reports on a systematic review of English language, peer-reviewed publications from 13 empirical studies with donor-conceived children and adults regarding their experiences and perceptions of donor conception. A total of 19 articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. These were identified by means of a bibliographic search of four electronic databases for the period 1990-2011 and supplemented by the authors' personal knowledge of work in this field. No reports from such studies appeared prior to 2000, and more than half have been published since 2008, demonstrating the relative novelty of research in this field. Much of the reviewed research evidence concerns individuals conceived through sperm donation conducted under a regime promoting both anonymity and nondisclosure. Consequently, there is little research that pertains to individuals conceived through other forms of collaborative reproduction, nor to those conceived under arrangements and regimes in which early parental disclosure is both advocated and practised and the identity of the donor and of other genetic relatives may be accessible to donor-conceived individuals. The studies consistently report that most donor-conceived people have an interest in securing information about their genetic and biographical heritage - more information than most of them have been able to obtain. Although a number of methodological limitations in the research base are identified, the authors conclude that the evidence is sufficiently robust to promote the implementation of policies and practices that promote transparency and openness in collaborative reproduction, thus reflecting the importance of maximising future choices and opportunities for donor-conceived people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22908619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med        ISSN: 1320-159X


  17 in total

1.  The limits of evidence: evidence based policy and the removal of gamete donor anonymity in the UK.

Authors:  Lucy Frith
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring's Wishes and Needs?

Authors:  An Ravelingien; Veerle Provoost; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Louise Johnson; Kate Bourne; Jane Fisher; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Ethics and regulation of inter-country medically assisted reproduction: a call for action.

Authors:  Carmel Shalev; Adi Moreno; Hedva Eyal; Michal Leibel; Rhona Schuz; Talia Eldar-Geva
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  Adolescents Conceived through Donor Insemination in Mother-Headed Families: A Qualitative Study of Motivations and Experiences of Contacting and Meeting Same-donor Offspring.

Authors:  Sherina Persaud; Tabitha Freeman; Vasanti Jadva; Jenna Slutsky; Wendy Kramer; Miriam Steele; Howard Steele; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Child Soc       Date:  2016-04-14

6.  The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-01-16

7.  Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion.

Authors:  Marilyn Crawshaw; Ken Daniels; Damian Adams; Kate Bourne; J A P van Hooff; Wendy Kramer; Lauri Pasch; Petra Thorn
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2015-11-10

8.  Gamete donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring.

Authors:  Maggie Kirkman; Kate Bourne; Jane Fisher; Louise Johnson; Karin Hammarberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The (Re) Production of the Genetically Related Body in Law, Technology and Culture: Mitochondria Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Danielle Griffiths
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-09

10.  Can the UK's birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?

Authors:  Marilyn A Crawshaw; Eric D Blyth; Julia Feast
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2017-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.