Literature DB >> 22905874

Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory.

Timothy F Brady1, Talia Konkle, George A Alvarez, Aude Oliva.   

Abstract

Are real-world objects represented as bound units? Although a great deal of research has examined binding between the feature dimensions of simple shapes, little work has examined whether the featural properties of real-world objects are stored in a single unitary object representation. In a first experiment, we found that information about an object's color is forgotten more rapidly than the information about an object's state (e.g., open, closed), suggesting that observers do not forget objects as entirely bound units. In a second and third experiment, we examined whether state and exemplar information are forgotten separately or together. If these properties are forgotten separately, the probability of getting one feature correct should be independent of whether the other feature was correct. We found that after a short delay, observers frequently remember both state and exemplar information about the same objects, but after a longer delay, memory for the two properties becomes independent. This indicates that information about object state and exemplar are forgotten separately over time. We thus conclude that real-world objects are not represented in a single unitary representation in visual memory. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22905874     DOI: 10.1037/a0029649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  24 in total

1.  Spatial resolution in visual memory.

Authors:  Asaf Ben-Shalom; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

2.  An integrative view of storage of low- and high-level visual dimensions in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Hagit Magen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Visual long-term memory is not unitary: Flexible storage of visual information as features or objects as a function of affect.

Authors:  Philipp Spachtholz; Christof Kuhbandner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Reconstructing the recent visual past: Hierarchical knowledge-based effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Marie Poirier; Daniel Heussen; Silvio Aldrovandi; Lauren Daniel; Saiyara Tasnim; James A Hampton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

5.  The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Adam S Eichenbaum; Michael J Starrett; Nathan S Rose; Stephen M Emrich; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

6.  Adaptive Memory Distortions Are Predicted by Feature Representations in Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yufei Zhao; Avi J H Chanales; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests.

Authors:  Simon W Davis; Benjamin R Geib; Erik A Wing; Wei-Chun Wang; Mariam Hovhannisyan; Zachary A Monge; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Adaptive Repulsion of Long-Term Memory Representations Is Triggered by Event Similarity.

Authors:  Avi J H Chanales; Alexandra G Tremblay-McGaw; Maxwell L Drascher; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21

9.  Feature-specific reaction times reveal a semanticisation of memories over time and with repeated remembering.

Authors:  Julia Lifanov; Juan Linde-Domingo; Maria Wimber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The associative structure of memory for multi-element events.

Authors:  Aidan J Horner; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.