Literature DB >> 22904947

1-(6-Bromo-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,4-benz-oxazin-4-yl)-2,2-dichloro-ethanone.

Fei Ye1, Ying Li, Ying Fu, Li-Xia Zhao, Shuang Gao.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(8)BrCl(2)NO(2), is a target mol-ecule in our research on herbicide safeners. The oxazine ring has an envelope conformation, with puckering parameters close to ideal values [Q = 0.498 (3) Å, θ = 53.7 (3)° and ϕ = 253.4 (4)°]. The crystal structure is stabilized by C-H⋯O, C-H⋯Cl and C-H⋯Br inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22904947      PMCID: PMC3414960          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background on 1,4-benzoxazine, see: Mizar & Myrboh (2006 ▶); Macias et al. (2006 ▶); Tang et al. (2011 ▶). For the herbicide safener activity of N-dichloro­acetyl benzoxazine derivatives, see: Burton et al. (1994 ▶); Hatzios & Burgos (2004 ▶); Loniovereror (1993 ▶); Scarponi & Buono (2005 ▶). For the synthetic procedure, see: Fu et al. (2011 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H8BrCl2NO2 M = 324.97 Monoclinic, a = 6.8220 (8) Å b = 23.567 (3) Å c = 7.3746 (9) Å β = 93.545 (1)° V = 1183.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 3.91 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.40 × 0.38 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.228, T max = 0.335 11742 measured reflections 2924 independent reflections 2924 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.020

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.102 S = 1.09 2924 reflections 145 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.44 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.92 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032011/fy2057sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032011/fy2057Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812032011/fy2057Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H8BrCl2NO2F(000) = 640.0
Mr = 324.97Dx = 1.824 Mg m3Dm = 1.824 Mg m3Dm measured by not measured
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 4705 reflections
a = 6.8220 (8) Åθ = 2.8–25.8°
b = 23.567 (3) ŵ = 3.91 mm1
c = 7.3746 (9) ÅT = 298 K
β = 93.545 (1)°Block, colourless
V = 1183.4 (3) Å30.40 × 0.38 × 0.28 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer2924 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2924 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.020
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.228, Tmax = 0.335k = −31→30
11742 measured reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.102H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0487P)2 + 0.7003P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2924 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
145 parametersΔρmax = 0.44 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.92 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C110.5861 (5)0.13121 (15)0.7608 (5)0.0693 (9)
H11A0.55040.16520.82510.083*
H11B0.48560.12430.66440.083*
C120.7804 (5)0.14020 (15)0.6796 (4)0.0640 (9)
H12A0.81800.10620.61600.077*
H12B0.77080.17130.59330.077*
C130.9285 (5)0.02632 (13)1.2299 (4)0.0535 (7)
H130.9280−0.00211.31730.064*
C10.7665 (5)0.03564 (13)1.1156 (4)0.0561 (7)
H10.65590.01301.12400.067*
C20.7655 (4)0.07871 (12)0.9869 (4)0.0484 (6)
C31.0255 (4)0.23991 (11)0.6714 (3)0.0464 (6)
H30.88720.24380.62890.056*
O10.5943 (3)0.08487 (10)0.8818 (3)0.0658 (6)
C51.0986 (4)0.10184 (10)1.0846 (3)0.0414 (5)
H51.21190.12321.07420.050*
C61.0390 (4)0.20127 (11)0.8395 (3)0.0436 (6)
C70.9324 (4)0.11209 (10)0.9693 (3)0.0403 (5)
C81.0934 (4)0.05971 (11)1.2139 (4)0.0440 (6)
O21.1457 (3)0.21396 (9)0.9706 (3)0.0601 (6)
N10.9288 (3)0.15339 (9)0.8282 (3)0.0477 (5)
Br11.31802 (5)0.046715 (14)1.37285 (4)0.06190 (14)
Cl21.12004 (16)0.30735 (4)0.72659 (12)0.0759 (3)
Cl31.15557 (16)0.20811 (5)0.49693 (13)0.0834 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C110.0554 (18)0.069 (2)0.079 (2)−0.0032 (15)−0.0341 (16)−0.0157 (17)
C120.072 (2)0.0626 (18)0.0528 (16)−0.0159 (15)−0.0313 (15)−0.0025 (14)
C130.0639 (18)0.0466 (14)0.0513 (15)−0.0081 (13)0.0138 (13)0.0011 (12)
C10.0510 (16)0.0524 (16)0.0665 (18)−0.0156 (13)0.0155 (14)−0.0071 (13)
C20.0414 (13)0.0462 (14)0.0570 (15)−0.0054 (11)−0.0018 (11)−0.0139 (12)
C30.0450 (13)0.0492 (14)0.0436 (13)0.0012 (11)−0.0083 (11)0.0065 (11)
O10.0448 (11)0.0669 (14)0.0835 (15)−0.0111 (10)−0.0128 (10)−0.0057 (12)
C50.0423 (13)0.0382 (12)0.0434 (12)−0.0042 (10)−0.0004 (10)0.0012 (10)
C60.0411 (12)0.0449 (13)0.0430 (13)−0.0011 (10)−0.0121 (10)0.0052 (10)
C70.0420 (13)0.0356 (12)0.0428 (12)−0.0021 (10)−0.0022 (10)−0.0046 (10)
C80.0512 (14)0.0406 (13)0.0405 (12)0.0024 (11)0.0043 (11)0.0002 (10)
O20.0667 (13)0.0535 (11)0.0559 (11)−0.0221 (10)−0.0302 (10)0.0168 (9)
N10.0520 (13)0.0427 (11)0.0455 (11)−0.0083 (10)−0.0194 (10)0.0016 (9)
Br10.0668 (2)0.0634 (2)0.05402 (19)0.00348 (14)−0.00809 (14)0.01693 (13)
Cl20.1089 (7)0.0562 (5)0.0599 (5)−0.0264 (4)−0.0170 (4)0.0171 (4)
Cl30.0936 (7)0.0934 (7)0.0651 (5)0.0173 (5)0.0213 (5)0.0018 (5)
C11—O11.409 (4)C2—C71.397 (4)
C11—C121.503 (5)C3—C61.536 (3)
C11—H11A0.9700C3—Cl21.754 (3)
C11—H11B0.9700C3—Cl31.774 (3)
C12—N11.479 (3)C3—H30.9800
C12—H12A0.9700C5—C81.379 (4)
C12—H12B0.9700C5—C71.396 (3)
C13—C11.365 (5)C5—H50.9300
C13—C81.384 (4)C6—O21.211 (3)
C13—H130.9300C6—N11.356 (3)
C1—C21.390 (4)C7—N11.424 (3)
C1—H10.9300C8—Br11.895 (3)
C2—O11.369 (3)
O1—C11—C12111.1 (3)C6—C3—Cl3109.09 (19)
O1—C11—H11A109.4Cl2—C3—Cl3110.98 (16)
C12—C11—H11A109.4C6—C3—H3108.8
O1—C11—H11B109.4Cl2—C3—H3108.8
C12—C11—H11B109.4Cl3—C3—H3108.8
H11A—C11—H11B108.0C2—O1—C11116.1 (2)
N1—C12—C11108.3 (3)C8—C5—C7119.5 (2)
N1—C12—H12A110.0C8—C5—H5120.3
C11—C12—H12A110.0C7—C5—H5120.3
N1—C12—H12B110.0O2—C6—N1123.9 (2)
C11—C12—H12B110.0O2—C6—C3120.1 (2)
H12A—C12—H12B108.4N1—C6—C3116.0 (2)
C1—C13—C8119.2 (3)C5—C7—C2118.8 (2)
C1—C13—H13120.4C5—C7—N1122.7 (2)
C8—C13—H13120.4C2—C7—N1118.4 (2)
C13—C1—C2120.6 (3)C5—C8—C13121.6 (3)
C13—C1—H1119.7C5—C8—Br1119.3 (2)
C2—C1—H1119.7C13—C8—Br1119.1 (2)
O1—C2—C1115.6 (3)C6—N1—C7122.7 (2)
O1—C2—C7124.0 (3)C6—N1—C12124.9 (2)
C1—C2—C7120.4 (3)C7—N1—C12112.2 (2)
C6—C3—Cl2110.32 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···O2i0.982.203.101 (3)153
C12—H12B···Cl2i0.972.883.664 (3)139
C11—H11B···Br1ii0.972.993.853 (3)148
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯O2i 0.982.203.101 (3)153
C12—H12B⋯Cl2i 0.972.883.664 (3)139
C11—H11B⋯Br1ii 0.972.993.853 (3)148

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Benoxacor induction of terbuthylazine detoxification in Zea mays and Festuca arundinacea.

Authors:  Luciano Scarponi; Daniele Del Buono
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Isolation and synthesis of allelochemicals from gramineae: benzoxazinones and related compounds.

Authors:  Francisco A Macías; David Marín; Alberto Oliveros-Bastidas; David Chinchilla; Ana M Simonet; José M G Molinillo
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 5.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.