Literature DB >> 22904926

3-Bromo-2-hy-droxy-benzaldehyde.

Jessica B Metlay1, Joseph M Tanski.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(7)H(5)BrO(2), is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation from the plane of all the non-H atoms = 0.0271 Å) and displays intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonding between the phenol group and the aldehyde O atom. Packing is directed by weak inter-molecular C-H⋯Br inter-actions and π-stacking between nearly parallel mol-ecules [dihedral angle = 5.30 (6)° and centroid-centroid distance = 3.752 (1) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22904926      PMCID: PMC3414939          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For information on the synthesis of the title compound, see: Hansen & Skattebol (2005 ▶). For recent uses of the title compound in the synthesis of biologically active compounds, see: Velázquez et al. (2012 ▶); Wang et al. (2012 ▶); Zhang et al. (2012 ▶). For use of the title compound to prepare Schiff base ligands for metal coordination chemistry, see: Escudero-Adán et al. (2010 ▶); McGarrigle et al. (2004 ▶); Tzubery & Tshuva (2012 ▶). For related crystal structures, see: Balasubramani et al. (2011 ▶); Fan, You, Liu, Qian & Huang (2008 ▶); Fan, You, Qian, Liu & Huang (2008 ▶) Iwasaki et al. (1976 ▶); Kirchner et al. (2011 ▶); Tang et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H5BrO2 M = 201.02 Monoclinic, a = 7.0282 (3) Å b = 14.9715 (7) Å c = 6.8472 (3) Å β = 108.907 (1)° V = 681.61 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.96 mm−1 T = 125 K 0.22 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 2007 ▶) T min = 0.354, T max = 0.842 10788 measured reflections 2074 independent reflections 1815 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.019 wR(F 2) = 0.048 S = 1.04 2074 reflections 95 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H5BrO2F(000) = 392
Mr = 201.02Dx = 1.959 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 6585 reflections
a = 7.0282 (3) Åθ = 2.7–30.5°
b = 14.9715 (7) ŵ = 5.96 mm1
c = 6.8472 (3) ÅT = 125 K
β = 108.907 (1)°Plate, colourless
V = 681.61 (5) Å30.22 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer2074 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1815 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
φ and ω scansθmax = 30.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 2007)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.354, Tmax = 0.842k = −21→21
10788 measured reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.048H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0249P)2 + 0.1779P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2074 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
95 parametersΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.25 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.11374 (2)0.567091 (9)0.25208 (2)0.02342 (6)
O20.12613 (15)0.76969 (8)0.28306 (17)0.0236 (2)
H20.144 (4)0.8217 (17)0.294 (4)0.055 (8)*
C10.4646 (2)0.88799 (9)0.3840 (2)0.0228 (3)
H10.58390.92290.42290.027*
O10.30259 (19)0.92736 (7)0.33528 (18)0.0284 (2)
C60.3410 (2)0.64329 (9)0.3299 (2)0.0170 (2)
C70.3132 (2)0.73579 (9)0.3323 (2)0.0166 (2)
C30.6776 (2)0.75351 (10)0.4401 (2)0.0202 (3)
H30.79250.79130.47810.024*
C50.5322 (2)0.60728 (9)0.3814 (2)0.0192 (3)
H50.54800.54430.37760.023*
C20.4853 (2)0.79087 (9)0.38599 (19)0.0177 (2)
C40.7016 (2)0.66178 (10)0.4385 (2)0.0219 (3)
H40.83230.63630.47600.026*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.01950 (8)0.01875 (8)0.03050 (9)−0.00399 (5)0.00602 (6)−0.00323 (5)
O20.0177 (5)0.0199 (5)0.0302 (6)0.0043 (4)0.0037 (4)−0.0004 (4)
C10.0317 (8)0.0177 (6)0.0188 (6)−0.0035 (6)0.0080 (6)0.0005 (5)
O10.0383 (7)0.0187 (5)0.0275 (6)0.0039 (4)0.0095 (5)0.0031 (4)
C60.0183 (6)0.0165 (6)0.0158 (6)−0.0017 (5)0.0049 (5)−0.0020 (5)
C70.0168 (6)0.0177 (6)0.0144 (6)0.0022 (5)0.0040 (5)−0.0002 (5)
C30.0190 (7)0.0241 (7)0.0175 (6)−0.0041 (5)0.0059 (5)−0.0014 (5)
C50.0222 (7)0.0172 (6)0.0181 (6)0.0027 (5)0.0062 (5)−0.0014 (5)
C20.0222 (6)0.0169 (6)0.0134 (6)−0.0018 (5)0.0050 (5)−0.0005 (5)
C40.0174 (6)0.0265 (7)0.0208 (6)0.0037 (5)0.0048 (5)−0.0009 (5)
Br1—C61.8933 (13)C7—C21.4107 (19)
O2—C71.3466 (16)C3—C41.384 (2)
O2—H20.79 (2)C3—C21.397 (2)
C1—O11.2284 (19)C3—H30.9500
C1—C21.4609 (19)C5—C41.391 (2)
C1—H10.9500C5—H50.9500
C6—C51.3836 (19)C4—H40.9500
C6—C71.3993 (19)
C7—O2—H2103.8 (18)C4—C3—H3119.8
O1—C1—C2124.12 (14)C2—C3—H3119.8
O1—C1—H1117.9C6—C5—C4121.02 (13)
C2—C1—H1117.9C6—C5—H5119.5
C5—C6—C7120.67 (13)C4—C5—H5119.5
C5—C6—Br1119.87 (10)C3—C2—C7120.60 (13)
C7—C6—Br1119.45 (10)C3—C2—C1119.08 (13)
O2—C7—C6119.90 (12)C7—C2—C1120.32 (13)
O2—C7—C2122.02 (12)C3—C4—C5119.28 (13)
C6—C7—C2118.08 (12)C3—C4—H4120.4
C4—C3—C2120.32 (13)C5—C4—H4120.4
C5—C6—C7—O2−179.59 (12)O2—C7—C2—C3178.81 (12)
Br1—C6—C7—O21.18 (17)C6—C7—C2—C3−1.59 (19)
C5—C6—C7—C20.79 (19)O2—C7—C2—C1−1.71 (19)
Br1—C6—C7—C2−178.43 (9)C6—C7—C2—C1177.89 (12)
C7—C6—C5—C40.6 (2)O1—C1—C2—C3178.64 (13)
Br1—C6—C5—C4179.81 (11)O1—C1—C2—C7−0.9 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C71.0 (2)C2—C3—C4—C50.4 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C1−178.47 (13)C6—C5—C4—C3−1.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O10.79 (2)1.90 (2)2.6364 (16)154 (2)
C4—H4···Br1i0.953.053.798 (2)137
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond and C—H⋯Br interaction geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O10.79 (2)1.90 (2)2.6364 (16)154 (2)
C4—H4⋯Br1i 0.953.053.798 (2)137

Symmetry code: (i) .

  11 in total

1.  Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel chalcone derivatives as antitubulin agents.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Jia-Jia Liu; Jian Sun; Xian-Hui Yang; Ting-Ting Zhao; Xiang Lu; Hai-Bin Gong; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Practical approach to structurally diverse monoimine salts and nonsymmetrical metallosalphen complexes.

Authors:  Eduardo C Escudero-Adán; Marta Martínez Belmonte; Jordi Benet-Buchholz; Arjan W Kleij
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.005

3.  Weak C-H···O hydrogen bonds in anisaldehyde, salicylaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde.

Authors:  Michael T Kirchner; Dieter Bläser; Roland Boese; Tejender S Thakur; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Cytotoxicity and hydrolysis of trans-Ti(IV) complexes of salen ligands: structure-activity relationship studies.

Authors:  Avia Tzubery; Edit Y Tshuva
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of aromatic spiroketals by spinphox/iridium(I)-catalyzed hydrogenation and spiroketalization of α,α'-bis(2-hydroxyarylidene) ketones.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wang; Zhaobin Han; Zheng Wang; Kuiling Ding
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  3,5-Dichloro-2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Ying Fan; Wei You; Jian-Lan Liu; Hui-Fen Qian; Wei Huang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-05-14

7.  3,5-Dibromo-2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Ying Fan; Wei You; Hui-Fen Qian; Jian-Lan Liu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-04-04

8.  Synthesis of new 4,5-dihydrofuranoindoles and their evaluation as HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitors.

Authors:  Francisco Velázquez; Srikanth Venkatraman; Charles A Lesburg; José Duca; Stuart B Rosenblum; Joseph A Kozlowski; F George Njoroge
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 6.005

9.  2-Hy-droxy-3-nitro-benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Bei Tang; Guangying Chen; Xiaoping Song; Changchun Cen; Changri Han
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-07-03

10.  3-Bromo-5-tert-butyl-2-hy-droxy-benz-alde-hyde.

Authors:  V Balasubramani; T Vinuchakkaravarthy; Sreeraj Gopi; S Narasimhan; D Velmurugan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.