Literature DB >> 22904925

6-Oxo-1,6-dihydro-pyridazine-3-carbaldehyde monohydrate.

Lei Wang1.   

Abstract

In the title hydrate, C(5)H(4)N(2)O(2)·H(2)O, the pyridazine ring is essentially planar, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0025 Å. In the crystal, O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into a one-dimensional chain.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22904925      PMCID: PMC3414938          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological functions of pyridazine and its derivatives, see: Heinisch & Kopelent (1992 ▶). For bond lengths and angles in related compounds, see: Sarkhel & Desiraju (2004 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H4N2O2·H2O M = 142.12 Monoclinic, a = 8.978 (2) Å b = 6.4150 (16) Å c = 11.354 (3) Å β = 101.696 (3)° V = 640.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.20 × 0.18 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.976, T max = 0.987 3981 measured reflections 1190 independent reflections 862 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.051 wR(F 2) = 0.159 S = 1.06 1190 reflections 92 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031674/jj2141sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031674/jj2141Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031674/jj2141Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H4N2O2·H2OF(000) = 296
Mr = 142.12Dx = 1.474 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1099 reflections
a = 8.978 (2) Åθ = 3.7–25.6°
b = 6.4150 (16) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 11.354 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 101.696 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 640.4 (3) Å30.20 × 0.18 × 0.11 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1190 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube862 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.976, Tmax = 0.987k = −7→7
3981 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.159w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0736P)2 + 0.3841P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1190 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
92 parametersΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.009 (5)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.2572 (2)1.0090 (3)0.98272 (18)0.0477 (6)
N20.1866 (2)0.9050 (3)1.05760 (18)0.0452 (6)
H10.14620.97881.10610.054*
O10.4654 (3)0.9374 (4)0.7609 (2)0.0853 (8)
O20.0999 (2)0.6205 (3)1.13746 (18)0.0611 (6)
O30.0862 (3)0.2000 (3)0.19846 (18)0.0672 (7)
H1W0.09110.31730.17550.101*
H2W0.03890.18580.24850.101*
C10.3210 (3)0.8957 (4)0.9111 (2)0.0456 (7)
C20.3184 (3)0.6758 (4)0.9111 (2)0.0524 (7)
H20.36610.60120.85900.063*
C30.2468 (3)0.5760 (4)0.9866 (2)0.0528 (7)
H30.24530.43110.98850.063*
C40.1722 (3)0.6946 (4)1.0650 (2)0.0461 (7)
C50.4022 (3)1.0224 (4)0.8288 (2)0.0410 (6)
H50.40171.16730.83230.049*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0609 (14)0.0400 (12)0.0494 (12)−0.0020 (10)0.0286 (11)0.0013 (9)
N20.0585 (13)0.0379 (12)0.0486 (12)−0.0005 (10)0.0332 (10)−0.0021 (9)
O10.1000 (18)0.0802 (17)0.0927 (16)−0.0064 (14)0.0598 (15)0.0048 (14)
O20.0840 (14)0.0454 (11)0.0703 (13)−0.0035 (10)0.0541 (11)0.0018 (9)
O30.1018 (17)0.0420 (11)0.0768 (14)0.0021 (10)0.0626 (13)−0.0010 (9)
C10.0521 (15)0.0438 (15)0.0459 (14)−0.0015 (12)0.0218 (12)0.0003 (11)
C20.0645 (17)0.0477 (16)0.0545 (16)0.0049 (13)0.0342 (14)−0.0041 (12)
C30.0706 (18)0.0361 (14)0.0623 (16)0.0006 (13)0.0383 (14)−0.0041 (12)
C40.0567 (16)0.0379 (15)0.0508 (14)0.0009 (12)0.0276 (12)0.0012 (11)
C50.0474 (13)0.0441 (14)0.0389 (12)−0.0028 (11)0.0260 (11)0.0014 (10)
N1—C11.306 (3)C1—C21.410 (4)
N1—N21.337 (3)C1—C51.531 (3)
N2—C41.360 (3)C2—C31.335 (4)
N2—H10.8600C2—H20.9300
O1—C51.179 (3)C3—C41.435 (3)
O2—C41.241 (3)C3—H30.9300
O3—H1W0.8002C5—H50.9300
O3—H2W0.7808
C1—N1—N2116.3 (2)C1—C2—H2120.3
N1—N2—C4126.68 (19)C2—C3—C4119.3 (2)
N1—N2—H1116.7C2—C3—H3120.3
C4—N2—H1116.7C4—C3—H3120.3
H1W—O3—H2W114.8O2—C4—N2119.3 (2)
N1—C1—C2123.2 (2)O2—C4—C3125.5 (2)
N1—C1—C5114.1 (2)N2—C4—C3115.2 (2)
C2—C1—C5122.8 (2)O1—C5—C1120.3 (3)
C3—C2—C1119.3 (2)O1—C5—H5119.8
C3—C2—H2120.3C1—C5—H5119.8
C1—N1—N2—C4−1.4 (4)N1—N2—C4—O2−178.3 (2)
N2—N1—C1—C2−0.4 (4)N1—N2—C4—C32.7 (4)
N2—N1—C1—C5−179.1 (2)C2—C3—C4—O2178.7 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C30.5 (5)C2—C3—C4—N2−2.3 (4)
C5—C1—C2—C3179.1 (2)N1—C1—C5—O1179.3 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C40.9 (4)C2—C1—C5—O10.5 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H1···O3i0.861.912.745 (3)165
O3—H1W···O2ii0.802.002.794 (3)173
O3—H2W···O2iii0.782.012.790 (2)172
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H1⋯O3i 0.861.912.745 (3)165
O3—H1W⋯O2ii 0.802.002.794 (3)173
O3—H2W⋯O2iii 0.782.012.790 (2)172

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologically active pyridazine derivatives. Part 2.

Authors:  G Heinisch; H Kopelent-Frank
Journal:  Prog Med Chem       Date:  1992

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition.

Authors:  Sanjay Sarkhel; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.