Literature DB >> 22903557

Predicted changes in fatty acid intakes, plasma lipids, and cardiovascular disease risk following replacement of trans fatty acid-containing soybean oil with application-appropriate alternatives.

Michael Lefevre1, Ronald P Mensink, Penny M Kris-Etherton, Barbara Petersen, Kim Smith, Brent D Flickinger.   

Abstract

The varied functional requirements satisfied by trans fatty acid (TFA)--containing oils constrains the selection of alternative fats and oils for use as potential replacements in specific food applications. We aimed to model the effects of replacing TFA-containing partially hydrogenated soybean oil (PHSBO) with application-appropriate alternatives on population fatty acid intakes, plasma lipids, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 24-hour dietary recalls for 1999-2002, we selected 25 food categories, accounting for 86 % of soybean oil (SBO) and 79 % of TFA intake for replacement modeling. Before modeling, those in the middle quintile had a mean PHSBO TFA intake of 1.2 % of energy. PHSBO replacement in applications requiring thermal stability by either low-linolenic acid SBO or mid-oleic, low-linolenic acid SBO decreased TFA intake by 0.3 % of energy and predicted CVD risk by 0.7-0.8 %. PHSBO replacement in applications requiring functional properties with palm-based oils reduced TFA intake by 0.8 % of energy, increased palmitic acid intake by 1.0 % of energy, and reduced predicted CVD risk by 0.4 %, whereas replacement with fully hydrogenated interesterified SBO reduced TFA intake by 0.7 % of energy, increased stearic acid intake by 1.0 % of energy, and decreased predicted CVD risk by 1.2 %. PHSBO replacement in both thermal and functional applications reduced TFA intake by 1.0 % of energy and predicted CVD risk by 1.5 %. Based solely on changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins, all PHSBO replacement models reduced estimated CVD risk, albeit less than previously reported using simpler replacement models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903557      PMCID: PMC3449058          DOI: 10.1007/s11745-012-3705-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lipids        ISSN: 0024-4201            Impact factor:   1.880


  19 in total

1.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

Review 2.  Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Martijn B Katan; Alberto Ascherio; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  F B Hu; M J Stampfer; J E Manson; E Rimm; G A Colditz; B A Rosner; C H Hennekens; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Nationwide product reformulations to reduce trans fatty acids in Canada: when trans fat goes out, what goes in?

Authors:  W M N Ratnayake; M R L'Abbe; D Mozaffarian
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Effect of substitution of high stearic low linolenic acid soybean oil for hydrogenated soybean oil on fatty acid intake.

Authors:  Maureen A DiRienzo; Shawna L Lemke; Barbara J Petersen; Kim M Smith
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 1.880

7.  Effect of substitution of low linolenic acid soybean oil for hydrogenated soybean oil on fatty acid intake.

Authors:  Maureen A DiRienzo; James D Astwood; Barbara J Petersen; Kim M Smith
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.880

8.  Monounsaturated fatty acids and atherosclerosis: opposing views from epidemiology and experimental animal models.

Authors:  J Mark Brown; Gregory S Shelness; Lawrence L Rudel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Understanding the complexity of trans fatty acid reduction in the American diet: American Heart Association Trans Fat Conference 2006: report of the Trans Fat Conference Planning Group.

Authors:  Robert H Eckel; Susan Borra; Alice H Lichtenstein; Shirley Y Yin-Piazza
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Stearic acid-rich interesterified fat and trans-rich fat raise the LDL/HDL ratio and plasma glucose relative to palm olein in humans.

Authors:  Kalyana Sundram; Tilakavati Karupaiah; K C Hayes
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.169

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Dietary trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease risk: past and present.

Authors:  Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  The Increasing Use of Interesterified Lipids in the Food Supply and Their Effects on Health Parameters.

Authors:  Ronald P Mensink; Thomas A Sanders; David J Baer; K C Hayes; Philip N Howles; Alejandro Marangoni
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Characteristics of pork belly consumption in South Korea and their health implication.

Authors:  Jee-Hwan Choe; Han-Sul Yang; Sang-Hoon Lee; Gwang-Woong Go
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-09

4.  Interesterified Palm Olein (IEPalm) and Interesterified Stearic Acid-Rich Fat Blend (IEStear) Have No Adverse Effects on Insulin Resistance: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Yen Teng Ng; Phooi Tee Voon; Tony Kock Wai Ng; Verna Kar Mun Lee; Miskandar Mat Sahri; Norhaizan Mohd Esa; Seng Huat Ong; Augustine Soon Hock Ong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  What are interesterified fats and should we be worried about them in our diet?

Authors:  C E Mills; W L Hall; S E E Berry
Journal:  Nutr Bull       Date:  2017-05-08

6.  Palmitic Acid Versus Stearic Acid: Effects of Interesterification and Intakes on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Merel A van Rooijen; Ronald P Mensink
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.