Literature DB >> 22902046

Precision of a commercial hartmann-shack aberrometer: limits of total wavefront laser vision correction.

Alberto López-Miguel1, Miguel José Maldonado, Arnaldo Belzunce, Jesús Barrio-Barrio, María Begoña Coco-Martín, Juan Carlos Nieto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the intrasession and intersession precision of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measured using a commercial Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (Zywave; Bausch & Lomb) in refractive surgery candidates.
DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study of a device.
METHODS: To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 experienced examiner measured 30 healthy eyes 5 times successively. To study intersession reproducibility, the same clinician obtained measurements from another 30 eyes in 2 consecutive sessions at the same time of day 1 week apart.
RESULTS: For intrasession repeatability, excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained for total ocular aberrations, total HOAs, and second-order terms (ICC, > 0.94). The ICCs for third-order terms also were high (ICCs, > 0.87); however, fourth-order ICCs varied from 0.71 to 0.90 (Z(4)(0) = 0.90); and fifth-order ICCs were less than 0.85. For intersession reproducibility, only total ocular aberrations, total ocular HOAs, second-order terms, Z(4)(0), Z(3)(1), and Z(3-)(3) had ICCs of 0.90 or more. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the limits of agreement (were clinically too wide for most higher-order Zernike terms, especially for the third-order terms (> 0.21 μm).
CONCLUSIONS: Total ocular aberrations, total HOAs, and second-order terms can be measured reliably by Zywave aberrometry without anatomic recognition. Third-order terms and Z(4)(0) are repeatable, but not as reproducible between visits. Fourth-order terms, except for Z(4)(0), and fifth-order terms are not sufficiently reliable for clinical decision making or treatment. Because the variability of Zywave can be a major limitation of a truly successful wavefront-guided excimer laser procedure, surgeons should consider treating HOA magnitudes that are more than the intrasession repeatability values (2.77 × S(w)) as those presented in this study.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  8 in total

1.  Single Session, Intra-observer Repeatability of an Advanced New Generation Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer in Refractive Surgery Candidates.

Authors:  Gaurav Prakash; Vishal Jhanji; Dhruv Srivastava; Muhammad Suhail; Shi-Song Rong; Ruthchel Bacero; Reena Philip
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

2.  The association between femtosecond laser flap parameters and ocular aberrations after uncomplicated custom myopic LASIK.

Authors:  Christopher T Hood; Ronald R Krueger; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Monochromatic higher order aberrations in highly myopic eyes with Staphyloma.

Authors:  Santiago Delgado-Tirado; Alberto López-Miguel; Yazmin Báez-Peralta; Lucía González-Buendía; Itziar Fernández; Jorge L Alió; Miguel J Maldonado; Rosa M Coco-Martín
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer.

Authors:  Sarah Moussa; Alois K Dexl; Eva M Krall; Eva M Arlt; Günther Grabner; Josef Ruckhofer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Intrasession repeatability of refractive and ocular aberrometric measurements obtained using a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Alberto López-Navarro; Inmaculada Cabezos; Dolores de Fez; María T Caballero; Vicent J Camps
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2017-05-04

6.  The optics of the human eye at 8.6 µm resolution.

Authors:  Sergio Bonaque-González; Juan M Trujillo-Sevilla; Miriam Velasco-Ocaña; Óscar Casanova-González; Miguel Sicilia-Cabrera; Alex Roqué-Velasco; Sabato Ceruso; Ricardo Oliva-García; Javier Martín-Hernández; Oscar Gomez-Cardenes; José G Marichal-Hernández; Damien Gatinel; Jack T Holladay; José M Rodríguez-Ramos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Carracedo; Carlos Carpena-Torres; Maria Serramito; Laura Batres-Valderas; Anahi Gonzalez-Bergaz
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Precision and agreement of higher order aberrations measured with ray tracing and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.

Authors:  Zequan Xu; Yanjun Hua; Wei Qiu; Guoqiang Li; Qiang Wu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.