Literature DB >> 22901035

The disparity of priapulid, archaeopriapulid and palaeoscolecid worms in the light of new data.

M A Wills1, S Gerber1, M Ruta2, M Hughes1.   

Abstract

Priapulids and their extinct relatives, the archaeopriapulids and palaeoscolecids, are vermiform, carnivorous ecdysozoans with an armoured, extensible proboscis. These worms were an important component of marine communities during the Palaeozoic, but were especially abundant and diverse in the Cambrian. Today, they comprise just seven genera in four families. Priapulids were among the first groups used to test hypotheses concerning the morphological disparity of Cambrian fossils relative to the extant fauna. A previous study sampled at the generic level, concluding that Cambrian genera embodied marginally less morphological diversity than their extant counterparts. Here, we sample predominantly at the species level and include numerous fossils and some extant forms described in the last fifteen years. Empirical morphospaces for priapulids, archaeopriapulids and palaeoscolecids are relatively insensitive to changes in the taxon or character sample: their overall form has altered little, despite the markedly improved sampling. Cambrian and post-Cambrian genera occupy adjacent rather than broadly overlapping regions of these spaces, and Cambrian species still show lower morphological disparity than their post-Cambrian counterparts. Crucially, the significance of this difference has increased with improved taxon sampling over research time. In contrast with empirical morphospaces, the phylogeny of priapulids, archaeopriapulids and palaeoscolecids derived from morphological characters is extremely sensitive to details of taxon sampling and the manner in which characters are weighted. However, the extant Priapulidae and Halicryptidae invariably resolve as sister families, with this entire clade subsequently being sister group to the Maccabeidae. In our most inclusive trees, the extant Tubiluchidae are separated from these other living taxa by a number of small, intervening fossil clades.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901035     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02586.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  10 in total

1.  What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Peter J Wagner; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Caught in the act: priapulid burrowers in early Cambrian substrates.

Authors:  Giannis Kesidis; Ben J Slater; Sören Jensen; Graham E Budd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A superarmored lobopodian from the Cambrian of China and early disparity in the evolution of Onychophora.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Javier Ortega-Hernández; Sylvain Gerber; Nicholas J Butterfield; Jin-Bo Hou; Tian Lan; Xi-guang Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Armored kinorhynch-like scalidophoran animals from the early Cambrian.

Authors:  Huaqiao Zhang; Shuhai Xiao; Yunhuan Liu; Xunlai Yuan; Bin Wan; A D Muscente; Tiequan Shao; Hao Gong; Guohua Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Bias and sensitivity in the placement of fossil taxa resulting from interpretations of missing data.

Authors:  Robert S Sansom
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Preservation and phylogeny of Cambrian ecdysozoans tested by experimental decay of Priapulus.

Authors:  Robert S Sansom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ancestral morphology of Ecdysozoa constrained by an early Cambrian stem group ecdysozoan.

Authors:  Richard J Howard; Gregory D Edgecombe; Xiaomei Shi; Xianguang Hou; Xiaoya Ma
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Internal anatomy of a fossilized embryonic stage of the Cambrian-Ordovician scalidophoran Markuelia.

Authors:  Xi-Ping Dong; Baichuan Duan; Jianbo Liu; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.653

10.  An Orthologue of the Retinoic Acid Receptor (RAR) Is Present in the Ecdysozoa Phylum Priapulida.

Authors:  Elza S S Fonseca; Youhei Hiromori; Yoshifumi Kaite; Raquel Ruivo; João N Franco; Tsuyoshi Nakanishi; Miguel M Santos; L Filipe C Castro
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.