Literature DB >> 22900138

Multiple, correlated covariates associated with differential item functioning (DIF): Accounting for language DIF when education levels differ across languages.

Laura E Gibbons1, Paul K Crane, Kala M Mehta, Otto Pedraza, Yuxiao Tang, Jennifer J Manly, Kaavya Narasimhalu, Jeanne Teresi, Richard N Jones, Dan Mungas.   

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when a test item has different statistical properties in subgroups, controlling for the underlying ability measured by the test. DIF assessment is necessary when evaluating measurement bias in tests used across different language groups. However, other factors such as educational attainment can differ across language groups, and DIF due to these other factors may also exist. How to conduct DIF analyses in the presence of multiple, correlated factors remains largely unexplored. This study assessed DIF related to Spanish versus English language in a 44-item object naming test. Data come from a community-based sample of 1,755 Spanish- and English-speaking older adults. We compared simultaneous accounting, a new strategy for handling differences in educational attainment across language groups, with existing methods. Compared to other methods, simultaneously accounting for language- and education-related DIF yielded salient differences in some object naming scores, particularly for Spanish speakers with at least 9 years of education. Accounting for factors that vary across language groups can be important when assessing language DIF. The use of simultaneous accounting will be relevant to other cross-cultural studies in cognition and in other fields, including health-related quality of life.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22900138      PMCID: PMC3418868          DOI: 10.4081/ar.2011.e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ageing Res        ISSN: 2036-7376


  34 in total

1.  Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Orlando Edelen; David Thissen; Jeanne A Teresi; Marjorie Kleinman; Katja Ocepek-Welikson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Differential item functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination. An application of the Mantel-Haenszel and standardization procedures.

Authors:  Neil J Dorans; Edward Kulick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Differential item functioning in the Mini-Mental State Examination in English- and Spanish-speaking older adults.

Authors:  Sarah C Marshall; Dan Mungas; Minda Weldon; Bruce Reed; Mary Haan
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-12

Review 5.  Item and scale differential functioning of the Mini-Mental State Exam assessed using the Differential Item and Test Functioning (DFIT) Framework.

Authors:  Leo S Morales; Claudia Flowers; Peter Gutierrez; Marjorie Kleinman; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Keith F Widaman; Robin H Pugh
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Education and sex differences in the mini-mental state examination: effects of differential item functioning.

Authors:  Richard N Jones; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.

Authors:  J A Teresi; M Kleinman; K Ocepek-Welikson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Jun 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses.

Authors:  N W Scott; P M Fayers; A Bottomley; N K Aaronson; A de Graeff; M Groenvold; M Koller; M A Petersen; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring depression levels in HIV-infected patients as part of routine clinical care using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

Authors:  P K Crane; L E Gibbons; J H Willig; M J Mugavero; S T Lawrence; J E Schumacher; M S Saag; M M Kitahata; H M Crane
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2010-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Demographic predictors of cognitive change in ethnically diverse older persons.

Authors:  Dawnté R Early; Keith F Widaman; Danielle Harvey; Laurel Beckett; Lovingly Quitania Park; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Bruce R Reed; Charles Decarli; Dan Mungas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-02-25

2.  Measurement equivalence across racial/ethnic groups of the mood and feelings questionnaire for childhood depression.

Authors:  My K Banh; Paul K Crane; Isaac Rhew; Gretchen Gudmundsen; Ann Vander Stoep; Aaron Lyon; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2012-04

3.  Challenges in Measuring Applied Cognition: Measurement Properties and Equivalence of the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT) Applied Cognition Item Bank.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Andrea Cheville; Mildred Ramirez
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  The effect of missing data and imputation on the detection of bias in cognitive testing using differential item functioning methods.

Authors:  E Nichols; J A Deal; B K Swenor; A G Abraham; N M Armstrong; K Bandeen-Roche; M C Carlson; M Griswold; F R Lin; T H Mosley; P Y Ramulu; N S Reed; A R Sharrett; A L Gross
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 4.612

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.