Literature DB >> 17060817

Differential item functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination. An application of the Mantel-Haenszel and standardization procedures.

Neil J Dorans1, Edward Kulick.   

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) attempts to identify items for which subpopulations of examinees exhibit performance differentials that are not consistent with the performance differentials seen among those subpopulations on a reliable measure of the construct of interest. DIF assessment requires a rule for scoring items and a matching variable on which different subpopulations can be viewed as comparable for purposes of assessing their performance on items. Typically, DIF is operationally defined as a difference in item performance between subpopulations, eg, Spanish-speakers and English-speakers, which exist after members of the different subpopulations have been matched on some one-dimensional matching variable such as total score. This work defines DIF, describes 2 standard procedures for measuring DIF, applies these DIF procedures to the Mini-Mental State Examination, and contrasts DIF with score equity analysis (SEA). The description of DIF assessment presented in this paper is applicable to any examination question that has responses that can be ordered, eg, with respect to correctness or severity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060817     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245182.36914.4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  18 in total

1.  Are clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias affected by education and self-reported race?

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Ellen Grober; Joseph P Eimicke; Amy R Ehrlich
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-02-06

2.  Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): An item response theory approach.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Joseph P Eimicke; Paul K Crane; Richard N Jones; Jin-Shei Lai; Seung W Choi; Ron D Hays; Bryce B Reeve; Steven P Reise; Paul A Pilkonis; David Cella
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2009

3.  Measurement in a multi-ethnic society. Overview to the special issue.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Anita L Stewart; Leo S Morales; Sidney M Stahl
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Differential item functioning and health assessment.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; John A Fleishman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Leo S Morales; Maria Orlando-Edelen; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Quantifying 'problematic' DIF within an IRT framework: application to a cancer stigma index.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Brian D Stucky; Anita Chandra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A comparison of three methods of assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and the Mantel chi-square procedure.

Authors:  Isobel M Cameron; Neil W Scott; Mats Adler; Ian C Reid
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Sources of variation on the mini-mental state examination in a population-based sample of centenarians.

Authors:  Ting Dai; Adam Davey; John L Woodard; Lloyd Stephen Miller; Yasuyuki Gondo; Seock-Ho Kim; Leonard W Poon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  A comparison of item response theory-based methods for examining differential item functioning in object naming test by language of assessment among older Latinos.

Authors:  Frances M Yang; Kevin C Heslin; Kala M Mehta; Cheng-Wu Yang; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays; Anita L Stewart; Dan Mungas; Richard N Jones; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Psychol Test Assess Model       Date:  2011

10.  Japanese-English language equivalence of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument among Japanese-Americans.

Authors:  Laura E Gibbons; Susan McCurry; Kristoffer Rhoads; Kamal Masaki; Lon White; Amy R Borenstein; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.