PURPOSE: We investigated abnormalities of the photoreceptor inner/outer segment (IS/OS) junction layer viewed "en face" and their functional correlates in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia (type 2 MacTel). METHODS: Segmentation and "en face" imaging of the IS/OS lines in spectral domain optical coherence tomographic (SD-OCT) volumes were performed manually. Mesopic retinal sensitivity thresholds were determined using a Nidek MP1 microperimeter. "En face" SD-OCT images and microperimetric data were superimposed over images of the fundus. Retinal structure and characteristics of type 2 MacTel were analyzed, and associations of structural changes with function were investigated. RESULTS: We examined 49 eyes of 28 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.4 years). Total IS/OS break area ranged from 0.04 to 2.23 mm² (mean 0.63 mm², SD 0.53 mm²) and 0.03 to 1.49 mm² (mean 0.49 mm², SD 0.42 mm²) in right and left eyes, respectively. A correlation between fellow eyes was present (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.770, P < 0.01). An assessment of the repeatability of IS/OS lesion area measurements (n = 19 eyes) revealed an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.975-0.996). Retinal areas corresponding to an IS/OS break showed a mean retinal sensitivity of 8.3 ± 5.8 and 8.7 ± 5.7 decibels (dB) in right and left eyes, respectively. Mean sensitivity over retinal areas outside the lesion was significantly higher, 17.0 ± 3.3 and 16.7 ± 3.6 dB in right and left eyes, respectively (paired t-test, P < 0.01). Mean aggregate retinal sensitivity loss was 33.5 ± 30.4 dB (n = 40), correlating well with IS/OS lesion area (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.848, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: "En face" OCT imaging of the IS/OS junction layer provides a functionally relevant method for assessing disease severity in type 2 MacTel.
PURPOSE: We investigated abnormalities of the photoreceptor inner/outer segment (IS/OS) junction layer viewed "en face" and their functional correlates in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia (type 2 MacTel). METHODS: Segmentation and "en face" imaging of the IS/OS lines in spectral domain optical coherence tomographic (SD-OCT) volumes were performed manually. Mesopic retinal sensitivity thresholds were determined using a Nidek MP1 microperimeter. "En face" SD-OCT images and microperimetric data were superimposed over images of the fundus. Retinal structure and characteristics of type 2 MacTel were analyzed, and associations of structural changes with function were investigated. RESULTS: We examined 49 eyes of 28 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.4 years). Total IS/OS break area ranged from 0.04 to 2.23 mm² (mean 0.63 mm², SD 0.53 mm²) and 0.03 to 1.49 mm² (mean 0.49 mm², SD 0.42 mm²) in right and left eyes, respectively. A correlation between fellow eyes was present (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.770, P < 0.01). An assessment of the repeatability of IS/OS lesion area measurements (n = 19 eyes) revealed an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.975-0.996). Retinal areas corresponding to an IS/OS break showed a mean retinal sensitivity of 8.3 ± 5.8 and 8.7 ± 5.7 decibels (dB) in right and left eyes, respectively. Mean sensitivity over retinal areas outside the lesion was significantly higher, 17.0 ± 3.3 and 16.7 ± 3.6 dB in right and left eyes, respectively (paired t-test, P < 0.01). Mean aggregate retinal sensitivity loss was 33.5 ± 30.4 dB (n = 40), correlating well with IS/OS lesion area (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.848, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: "En face" OCT imaging of the IS/OS junction layer provides a functionally relevant method for assessing disease severity in type 2 MacTel.
Authors: Anjali S Maheshwary; Stephen F Oster; Ritchie M S Yuson; Lingyun Cheng; Francesca Mojana; William R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Lelia A Paunescu; Tony H Ko; Jay S Duker; Annie Chan; Wolfgang Drexler; Joel S Schuman; James G Fujimoto Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jakub J Kaluzny; Maciej Wojtkowski; Bartosz L Sikorski; Maciej Szkulmowski; Anna Szkulmowska; Tomasz Bajraszewski; James G Fujimoto; Jay S Duker; Joel S Schuman; Andrzej Kowalczyk Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Date: 2009 Mar-Apr
Authors: Peter Charbel Issa; Eric Troeger; Robert Finger; Frank G Holz; Robert Wilke; Hendrik P N Scholl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jana Stefanickova; Sandeep Saxena; Dwividendra K Nim; Kaleem Ahmad; Abbas A Mahdi; Apjit Kaur; Shashi K Bhasker; Jela Valaskova; Peter Kruzliak Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Daniel Pauleikhoff; Roberto Bonelli; Adam M Dubis; Frederic Gunnemann; Kai Rothaus; Peter Charbel Issa; Tjebo Fc Heeren; Tunde Peto; Traci E Clemons; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird; Ferenc B Sallo Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Tunde Peto; Tjebo F C Heeren; Traci E Clemons; Ferenc B Sallo; Irene Leung; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Emily Y Chew; Traci E Clemons; Tunde Peto; Ferenc B Sallo; Avner Ingerman; Weng Tao; Lawrence Singerman; Steven D Schwartz; Neal S Peachey; Alan C Bird Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Ferenc B Sallo; Tunde Peto; Catherine Egan; Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Traci E Clemons; Mark C Gillies; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Gary S Rubin; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Peter Charbel Issa; Mark C Gillies; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird; Tjebo F C Heeren; Tunde Peto; Frank G Holz; Hendrik P N Scholl Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 21.198