Literature DB >> 22899285

Delay to formalin fixation 'cold ischemia time': effect on ERBB2 detection by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry.

Bryce P Portier1, Zhen Wang, Erinn Downs-Kelly, Jordi J Rowe, Deepa Patil, Chis Lanigan, G Thomas Budd, David G Hicks, David L Rimm, Raymond R Tubbs.   

Abstract

The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists ERBB2 testing guidelines address several pre-analytical variables known to affect ERBB2 testing accuracy. According to 2010 updated guidelines, the pre-analytical variable of time to tissue fixation (cold ischemia time) should be kept to <1 h, however, little has been published about cold ischemia time and its significance in ERBB2 testing. To that end, this study evaluated ERBB2 status using two different FDA-approved in-situ hybridization methods and an FDA-approved immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay in the largest cohort to date (n=84) of invasive breast carcinomas with tracked cold ischemia time. Cold ischemia time was stratified into four groups (<1 h (n=45), 1-2 h (n=27), 2-3 h (n=6), and >3 h (n=6)) and ERBB2 status was evaluated in each group by IHC (4B5) and by in-situ hybridization methodologies (PathVysion(®) fluorescence in situ hybridization and the INFORM HER2(®) dual in situ DNA probe assay). Both in-situ hybridization methods were evaluated using three ERBB2 scoring criteria (dual-probe guidelines, single-probe guidelines, and the FDA package insert scoring instructions). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and INFORM HER2(®) demonstrated 100% concordance in the detection of ERBB2 amplification by all three scoring guidelines at all cold ischemia time points. Agreement between in-situ hybridization methodologies and IHC was superior using single-probe guidelines compared with dual probe or FDA scoring instructions. In addition, Inform HER2(®) in-situ hybridization signals were significantly more intense than FISH at all cold ischemia time points, however, no significant loss of either chromosome 17 or ERBB2 signal was detected by FISH or Inform HER2(®) in-situ hybridization in cold ischemia times up to 3 h. On the basis of our findings, cold ischemia time up to 3 h has no deleterious effect on the detection of ERBB2 via in-situ hybridization or IHC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899285     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  16 in total

1.  Section detachment in immunohistochemistry: causes, troubleshooting, and problem-solving.

Authors:  Alessandro Gambella; Lucia Porro; Simona Pigozzi; Roberto Fiocca; Federica Grillo; Luca Mastracci
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 2.  Obstacles to precision oncology: confronting current factors affecting the successful introduction of biomarkers to the clinic.

Authors:  Ludmila Prudkin; Paolo Nuciforo
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 3.  Effects of Cold Ischemia on Gene Expression: A Review and Commentary.

Authors:  William E Grizzle; Dennis Otali; Katherine C Sexton; Daniel S Atherton
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction is an alternative method for the detection of HER-2 amplification in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples.

Authors:  Tianjie Pu; Peng Guo; Yan Qiu; Shinan Chen; Libo Yang; Linyong Sun; Feng Ye; Hong Bu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 5.  HER2 heterogeneity in gastric/gastroesophageal cancers: From benchside to practice.

Authors:  Federica Grillo; Matteo Fassan; Francesca Sarocchi; Roberto Fiocca; Luca Mastracci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Essentials for Pathological Evaluation of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies and Synoptic Reporting of Cytoreductive Surgery Specimens-A review and evidence-based guide.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Suniti Mishra; Loma Parikh; Sandeep Sheth; Imran Gorur
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-19

Review 7.  Quantification of HER family receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Nuciforo; Nina Radosevic-Robin; Tony Ng; Maurizio Scaltriti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  A collection of primary tissue cultures of tumors from vacuum packed and cooled surgical specimens: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Laura Annaratone; Caterina Marchiò; Rosalia Russo; Luigi Ciardo; Sandra Milena Rondon-Lagos; Margherita Goia; Maria Stella Scalzo; Stefania Bolla; Isabella Castellano; Ludovica Verdun di Cantogno; Gianni Bussolati; Anna Sapino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automated quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence in situ imaging identifies phospho-S6 and phospho-PRAS40 as predictive protein biomarkers for prostate cancer lethality.

Authors:  Michail Shipitsin; Clayton Small; Eldar Giladi; Summar Siddiqui; Sibgat Choudhury; Sadiq Hussain; Yi E Huang; Hua Chang; David L Rimm; David M Berman; Thomas P Nifong; Peter Blume-Jensen
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Quantification of the heterogeneity of prognostic cellular biomarkers in ewing sarcoma using automated image and random survival forest analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Bühnemann; Simon Li; Haiyue Yu; Harriet Branford White; Karl L Schäfer; Antonio Llombart-Bosch; Isidro Machado; Piero Picci; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Nicholas A Athanasou; J Alison Noble; A Bassim Hassan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.