Literature DB >> 22898084

Bone mineral density measured by a portable X-ray device agrees with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at forearm in preschool aged children.

Tom J Hazell1, Catherine A Vanstone1, Celia J Rodd2, Frank Rauch3, Hope A Weiler4.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures of bone mineral density (BMD) are generally not feasible in fieldwork. The present study determined the agreement between BMD measured by DXA and portable peripheral DXA in preschool aged children. Fifty-seven children (4.2 ± 1.0 yr) had their nondominant distal forearm scanned using a peripheral DXA scanner (PIXI; GE Medical Systems Lunar, Madison, WI) at their daycare and a DXA (4500A Discovery Series; Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA) at our research clinic. Correlation analysis, one-way analysis of variance, and Bland-Altman plots were performed to examine the agreement between measurements. Data were also divided into tertiles for cross-classification analysis and calculation of kappa coefficients. Distal forearm BMD measured by PIXI was significantly correlated with DXA measures of total forearm BMD (r > 0.51; p < 0.001), proximal 1/3 BMD (r > 0.41; p < 0.001), mid-BMD (r > 0.37; p < 0.001), and ultradistal (UD) BMD (r > 0.57; p < 0.001). Cross-classification in the same or adjacent tertile between measures (UD forearm: 96.5%; UD radius: 94.4%; total forearm: 87.7%; total radius: 84.2%) resulted in weighted kappa coefficients of 0.46, 0.58, 0.42, and 0.43, respectively. Bland-Altman plots further clarified these agreements as all had low bias (UD forearm: bias = 0.003 ± 0.002; UD radius: -0.015 ± 0.021; total forearm: -0.062 ± 0.027; total radius: -0.077 ± 0.026). These results demonstrate that portable DXA measures of forearm BMD agree moderately with DXA.
Copyright © 2013 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; PIXI; peripheral DXA; radius; ulna

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898084     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of bone densitometry using radiography with a step-wedge phantom: a pilot study of the forearm.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Pengju Huang; Hui Du; Jian Geng; Xinghua Yin; Yandong Liu; Tanuj Puri; Bo He; Liang Lyu; Xiaoguang Cheng; Xieyuan Jiang; Klaus Engelke; Glen M Blake
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  SIDE TO SIDE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DOMINANT AND NON-DOMINANT ARM'S BONE DENSITY AND ISOMETRIC HANDGRIP STRENGTH IN MALES AND FEMALES AGED 40-65 YEARS OLD.

Authors:  Ermira Krasniqi; Mynyr Koni; Antigona Kabashi; Abedin Bahtiri; Selda Gjeli; Arben Boshnjaku
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2016-10-17

3.  Experience using a portable X-ray system at the scene transported by a physician-staffed helicopter.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Omori; Youichi Yanagawa; Ken-Ichi Muramatsu; Hiroki Nagasawa; Ikuto Takeuchi; Shunsuke Madokoro; Kei Jitsuiki; Shoichiro Yatsu; Hiromichi Ohsaka; Kouhei Ishikawa
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-05-23

4.  Prescreening for osteoporosis with forearm bone densitometry in health examination population.

Authors:  Chun Yue; Na Ding; Lu-Lu Xu; Ya-Qian Fu; Yuan-Wei Guo; Yan-Yi Yang; Xian-Mei Zhao; Zhi-Feng Sheng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.