| Literature DB >> 22896816 |
Prafulla B Choudhari1, Manish S Bhatia, Swapnil D Jadhav.
Abstract
The three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) and pharmacophore identification studies on 28 substituted benzoxazinone derivatives as antiplatelet agents have been carried out. Multiple linear regression (MLR) method was applied for QSAR model development considering training and test set approaches with various feature selection methods. Stepwise (SW), simulated annealing (SA) and genetic algorithm (GA) were applied to derive QSAR models which were further validated for statistical significance and predictive ability by internal and external validation. The results of pharmacophore identification studies showed that hydrogen bond accepters, aromatic and hydrophobic, are the important features for antiplatelet activity. The selected best 3D kNN-MFA model A has a training set of 23 molecules and test set of 5 molecules with validation (q(2)) and cross validation (pred_r(2)) values 0.9739 and 0.8217, respectively. Additionally, the selected best 3D QSAR (MLR) model B has a training set of 23 molecules and test set of 5 molecules with validation (r(2)) and cross validation (pred_r(2)) values of 0.9435 and 0.7663, respectively, and four descriptors at the grid points S_123, E_407, E_311 and H_605. The information rendered by 3D-QSAR models may lead to a better understanding and designing of novel potent antiplatelet molecules.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-platelet; Drug design; QSAR; kNNMFA
Year: 2012 PMID: 22896816 PMCID: PMC3383213 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1112-09
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Selected MLR QSAR equations along with statistical parameters employed for model selection.
| A | pIC50=0.0036+11.7432(±5.4497) | 28 | 0.9435 | 0.8784 | 64.2607 | 0.7663 |
| B | pIC50=0.0014+1.9224(±0.6960) | 28 | 0.8780 | 0.7365 | 32.3774 | 0.7489 |
Fig. 1.Field point for selected QSAR model A
Fig. 2.Contribution plot for selected QSAR model A
Fig. 3.Correlation plot for selected QSAR model A
Observed and predicted activity for Model A
| 1 | −4.796 | −5.009 | 0.213 |
| 2 | −3.951 | −4.048 | 0.097 |
| 3 | −5.222 | −4.957 | −0.264 |
| 4 | −4.721 | −4.729 | 0.008 |
| 5 | −3.76 | −4.395 | 0.635 |
| 6 | −3.813 | −3.939 | 0.126 |
| 7 | −4.456 | −4.052 | −0.403 |
| 8 | −3.813 | −3.761 | −0.051 |
| 9 | −3.951 | −3.859 | −0.091 |
| 10 | −4.051 | −4.193 | 0.142 |
| 11 | −3.86 | −4.348 | 0.488 |
| 12 | −4.097 | −3.875 | −0.221 |
| 13 | −5 | −4.422 | −0.577 |
| 14 | −4.824 | −4.827 | 0.003 |
| 15 | −4.201 | −4.496 | 0.295 |
| 16 | −5.237 | −4.707 | −0.529 |
| 17 | −4.523 | −4.430 | −0.092 |
| 18 | −4.585 | −4.822 | 0.237 |
| 19 | −1.31 | −1.275 | −0.034 |
| 20 | −4.432 | −4.701 | 0.269 |
| 21 | −5.222 | −5.018 | −0.203 |
| 22 | −3.745 | −4.297 | 0.552 |
| 23 | −3.86 | −4.581 | 0.721 |
| 24 | −4.585 | −4.471 | −0.113 |
| 25 | −5.31 | −5.240 | −0.069 |
| 26 | −5.201 | −4.957 | −0.243 |
| 27 | −5.201 | −4.778 | −0.422 |
| 28 | −4.658 | −4.435 | −0.222 |
...Test set molecules.
Selected kNNMFA QSAR equations along with statistical parameters employed for model selection.
| E_746 | E_746 (−0.1143...−0.0560) | |||||
| C | E_262 | 28 | E_262 (−0.0241...0.0202) | 0.9739 | 0.8217 | 19 |
| E_748 | E_748 (−0.3085...−0.2716) | |||||
| D | E_295 | 28 | E_295 (2.7514...5.7547) | 0.7425 | 0.6427 | 20 |
| E_235 | E_235 (−0.6487...0.1711) |
Fig. 4.Field point for selected QSAR model C
Observed and predicted activity for Model C
| 1 | −4.796 | −4.654 | −0.141 |
| 2 | −3.951 | −3.853 | −0.097 |
| 3 | −5.222 | −5.253 | 0.031 |
| 4 | −4.721 | −4.691 | −0.029 |
| 5 | −3.76 | −3.954 | 0.194 |
| 6 | −3.813 | −3.909 | 0.096 |
| 7 | −4.456 | −4.476 | 0.020 |
| 8 | −3.813 | −3.802 | −0.010 |
| 9 | −3.951 | −4.076 | 0.125 |
| 10 | −4.051 | −4.008 | −0.042 |
| 11 | −3.86 | −4.123 | 0.263 |
| 12 | −4.097 | −3.856 | −0.240 |
| 13 | −5 | −3.955 | −1.044 |
| 14 | −4.824 | −4.832 | 0.008 |
| 15 | −4.201 | −3.885 | −0.315 |
| 16 | −5.237 | −4.633 | −0.603 |
| 17 | −4.523 | −4.444 | −0.078 |
| 18 | −4.585 | −4.521 | −0.063 |
| 19 | −1.31 | −1.491 | 0.181 |
| 20 | −4.432 | −4.345 | −0.086 |
| 21 | −5.222 | −5.029 | −0.192 |
| 22 | −3.745 | −3.835 | 0.090 |
| 23 | −3.86 | −3.884 | 0.024 |
| 24 | −4.585 | −4.758 | 0.173 |
| 25 | −5.31 | −5.010 | −0.299 |
| 26 | −5.201 | −5.262 | 0.061 |
| 27 | −5.201 | −5.054 | −0.146 |
| 28 | −4.658 | −3.955 | −0.702 |
...Test set molecules.
Fig. 5.Correlation plot for selected QSAR model C
Fig. 6.Selected pharmacophore model
Structure of studied molecules
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 1 | 6-CF3 | 2,6-F | −4.796 |
| 2 | 7-NO2 | 2,6-F | −3.951 |
| 3 | 5-F | 2,6-F | −5.222 |
| 4 | 6-NO2 | 2,6-F | −4.721 |
| 5 | 7-CF3 | 2,6-F | −3.76 |
| 6 | 6-OCH3 | 2,6-F | −3.813 |
| 7 | 6-NHAc | 2,6-F | −4.456 |
| 8 | 6-NH2 | 2,6-F | −3.813 |
| 9 | 5-COOCH3 | 2,6-F | −3.951 |
| 10 | 5-CH3 | 2,6-F | −4.051 |
| 11 | H | 2-F | −3.86 |
| 12 | 8-CF3 | 2,6-F | −4.097 |
| 13 | 6-CH3 | 2,6-F | −5 |
| 14 | 6-I | 2-Cl | −4.824 |
| 15 | 6-CH3 | 2,6-Cl | −4.201 |
| 16 | 5-NO2 | 2-OCH3 | −5.237 |
| 17 | H | 2-OCH3,5-Cl | −4.523 |
| 18 | 5-NO2 | 2-COOMe | −4.585 |
| 19 | 6-NO2 | 2-COOMe | −1.31 |
| 20 | 6-CF3 | 2-F | −4.432 |
| 21 | 6-Cl | 2-Br | −5.222 |
| 22 | 5,8-Cl | 2-F | −3.745 |
| 23 | 5-COOCH3 | 2-F | −3.86 |
| 24 | 5-NO2 | 2-F | −4.585 |
| 25 | 5-Cl | 2,6-F | −5.31 |
| 26 | 5-NO2 | 2,6-F | −5.201 |
| 27 | 5,8-Cl | 2,6-F | −5.201 |
| 28 | 6-CH3 | 2,6-F | −4.658 |
Fig. 7.Alignment of the molecules