Literature DB >> 22894414

On the output factor measurements of the CyberKnife iris collimator small fields: Experimental determination of the k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factors for microchamber and diode detectors.

E Pantelis1, A Moutsatsos, K Zourari, L Petrokokkinos, L Sakelliou, W Kilby, C Antypas, P Papagiannis, P Karaiskos, E Georgiou, I Seimenis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the output factors (OFs) of the small fields formed by the variable aperture collimator system (iris) of a CyberKnife (CK) robotic radiosurgery system, and determine the k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factors for a microchamber and four diode detectors.
METHODS: OF measurements were performed using a PTW PinPoint 31014 microchamber, four diode detectors (PTW-60017, -60012, -60008, and the SunNuclear EDGE detector), TLD-100 microcubes, alanine dosimeters, EBT films, and polymer gels for the 5 mm, 7.5 mm, 10 mm, 12.5 mm, and 15 mm iris collimators at 650 mm, 800 mm, and 1000 mm source to detector distance (SDD). The alanine OF measurements were corrected for volume averaging effects using the 3D dose distributions registered in polymer gel dosimeters. k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factors for the PinPoint microchamber and the diode dosimeters were calculated through comparison against corresponding polymer gel, EBT, alanine, and TLD results.
RESULTS: Experimental OF results are presented for the array of dosimetric systems used. The PinPoint microchamber was found to underestimate small field OFs, and a k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factor ranging from 1.127 ± 0.022 (for the 5 mm iris collimator) to 1.004 ± 0.010 (for the 15 mm iris collimator) was determined at the reference SDD of 800 mm. The PinPoint k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factor was also found to increase with decreasing SDD; k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) values equal to 1.220 ± 0.028 and 1.077 ± 0.016 were obtained for the 5 mm iris collimator at 650 mm and 1000 mm SDD, respectively. On the contrary, diode detectors were found to overestimate small field OFs and a correction factor equal to 0.973 ± 0.006, 0.954 ± 0.006, 0.937 ± 0.007, and 0.964 ± 0.006 was measured for the PTW-60017, -60012, -60008 and the EDGE diode detectors, respectively, for the 5 mm iris collimator at 800 mm SDD. The corresponding correction factors for the 15 mm iris collimator were found equal to 0.997 ± 0.010, 0.994 ± 0.009, 0.988 ± 0.010, and 0.986 ± 0.010, respectively. No correlation of the diode k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factors with SDD was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates an experimental procedure for the determination of the k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) correction factors required to obtain small field OF results of increased accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894414     DOI: 10.1118/1.4736810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of a synthetic single-crystal diamond detector for relative dosimetry measurements on a CyberKnife.

Authors:  A Chalkley; G Heyes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of beam modeling for small fields using a flattening filter-free beam.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Shuichi Ozawa; Takeo Nakashima; Masamichi Aita; Shintaro Tsuda; Yusuke Ochi; Takuro Okumura; Hirokazu Masuda; Yoshimi Ohno; Yuji Murakami; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-06-21

Review 3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues.

Authors:  Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Lijun Ma; Wilko Verbakel; David Larson; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Deriving detector-specific correction factors for rectangular small fields using a scintillator detector.

Authors:  Yujiao Qin; Hualiang Zhong; Ning Wen; Karen Snyder; Yimei Huang; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Survey of 5 mm small-field output factor measurements in Australia.

Authors:  Christopher P Oliver; Duncan J Butler; Viliami Takau; Ivan Williams
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator.

Authors:  Paula Monasor Denia; María Del Carmen Castellet García; Carla Manjón García; Juan David Quirós Higueras; Noelia de Marco Blancas; Jorge Bonaque Alandí; Xavier Jordi Juan Senabre; Agustín Santos Serra; Juan López-Tarjuelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  CyberKnife® fixed cone and Iris™ defined small radiation fields: Assessment with a high-resolution solid-state detector array.

Authors:  Giordano Biasi; Marco Petasecca; Susanna Guatelli; Ebert A Martin; Garry Grogan; Benjamin Hug; Jonathan Lane; Vladimir Perevertaylo; Tomas Kron; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Output correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallel.

Authors:  Božidar Casar; Eduard Gershkevitsh; Ignasi Mendez; Slaven Jurković; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.