Literature DB >> 22894229

Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.

Jason Bishop1, Patricia Keating.   

Abstract

How are listeners able to identify whether the pitch of a brief isolated sample of an unknown voice is high or low in the overall pitch range of that speaker? Does the speaker's voice quality convey crucial information about pitch level? Results and statistical models of two experiments that provide answers to these questions are presented. First, listeners rated the pitch levels of vowels taken over the full pitch ranges of male and female speakers. The absolute f0 of the samples was by far the most important determinant of listeners' ratings, but with some effect of the sex of the speaker. Acoustic measures of voice quality had only a very small effect on these ratings. This result suggests that listeners have expectations about f0s for average speakers of each sex, and judge voice samples against such expectations. Second, listeners judged speaker sex for the same speech samples. Again, absolute f0 was the most important determinant of listeners' judgments, but now voice quality measures also played a role. Thus it seems that pitch level judgments depend on voice quality mostly indirectly, through its information about sex. Absolute f0 is the most important information for deciding both pitch level and speaker sex.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894229     DOI: 10.1121/1.4714351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Modeling the voice source in terms of spectral slopes.

Authors:  Marc Garellek; Robin Samlan; Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Xing Wang; Ning-Yu Wang; Xin Fu; Tian Gan; John J Galvin; Shelby Willis; Kevin Xu; Mathew Thomas; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A Moan of Pleasure Should Be Breathy: The Effect of Voice Quality on the Meaning of Human Nonverbal Vocalizations.

Authors:  Andrey Anikin
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  The Effect of Speech Variability on Tonal Language Speakers' Second Language Lexical Tone Learning.

Authors:  Kaile Zhang; Gang Peng; Yonghong Li; James W Minett; William S-Y Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-23

6.  Towards Evaluating Pitch-Related Phonation Function in Speech Communication Using High-Density Surface Electromyography.

Authors:  Mingxing Zhu; Xin Wang; Hanjie Deng; Yuchao He; Haoshi Zhang; Zhenzhen Liu; Shixiong Chen; Mingjiang Wang; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Effects of Minerva Orthosis on Larynx Height in Young, Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Pegah Saddat Hosseini; Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Saeideh Moayedfar; Marzieh Golabbakhsh; Fatemeh Abnavi
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2017-12-15

8.  High-density intracranial recordings reveal a distinct site in anterior dorsal precentral cortex that tracks perceived speech.

Authors:  Julia Berezutskaya; Clarissa Baratin; Zachary V Freudenburg; Nicolas F Ramsey
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.