Literature DB >> 34972311

Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production.

Zhaoyan Zhang1.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated the effect of sex- and age-related differences in vocal fold length, thickness, and depth on voice production in a three-dimensional vocal fold model. The results showed that the cause-effect relationships between vocal fold physiology and voice production previously identified in an adult male-like vocal fold geometry remained qualitatively the same in vocal folds with geometry representative of adult females and children. We further showed that the often-observed differences in voice production between adult males, adult females, and children can be explained by differences in length and thickness. The lower F0, higher flow rate, larger vocal fold vibration amplitude, and higher sound pressure level (SPL) in adult males as compared to adult females and children can be explained by differences in vocal fold length. In contrast, the thickness effect dominated and contributed to the larger closed quotient of vocal fold vibration, larger normalized maximum flow declination rate, and lower H1-H2 in adult males as compared to adult females and children. The effect of differences in vocal fold depth was generally small. When targeting a specific SPL, adult males experienced a lower peak vocal fold contact pressure during phonation than adult females and children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34972311      PMCID: PMC8716178          DOI: 10.1121/10.0009033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  A finite-element model of vocal-fold vibration.

Authors:  F Alipour; D A Berry; I R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age, sex, and vowel dependencies of acoustic measures related to the voice source.

Authors:  Markus Iseli; Yen-Liang Shue; Abeer Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aerodynamic profiles of women with muscle tension dysphonia/aphonia.

Authors:  Amanda I Gillespie; Jackie Gartner-Schmidt; Elaine N Rubinstein; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A parametric vocal fold model based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Liang Wu; Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Laryngeal strategies to minimize vocal fold contact pressure and their effect on voice production.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Biaxial mechanical properties of human vocal fold cover under vocal fold elongation.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang; Himadri Samajder; Jennifer L Long
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency and risk factors for voice problems in teachers of singing and control subjects.

Authors:  M K Miller; K Verdolini
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Vocal fold mass is not a useful quantity for describing F0 in vocalization.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population.

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Susan Thibeault; Rahul A Parsa; Steven D Gray; Elaine M Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Influence of embedded fibers and an epithelium layer on the glottal closure pattern in a physical vocal fold model.

Authors:  Yue Xuan; Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phonetic Realizations of Metrical Structure in Tone Languages: Evidence From Chinese Dialects.

Authors:  Chengyu Guo; Fei Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.