BACKGROUND: Candidemia is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality; changes in population-based incidence rates have not been reported. METHODS: We conducted active, population-based surveillance in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, and Baltimore City/County, Maryland (combined population 5.2 million), during 2008-2011. We calculated candidemia incidence and antifungal drug resistance compared with prior surveillance (Atlanta, 1992-1993; Baltimore, 1998-2000). RESULTS: We identified 2675 cases of candidemia with 2329 isolates during 3 years of surveillance. Mean annual crude incidence per 100 000 person-years was 13.3 in Atlanta and 26.2 in Baltimore. Rates were highest among adults aged ≥65 years (Atlanta, 59.1; Baltimore, 72.4) and infants (aged <1 year; Atlanta, 34.3; Baltimore, 46.2). In both locations compared with prior surveillance, adjusted incidence significantly declined for infants of both black and white race (Atlanta: black risk ratio [RR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .17-.38]; white RR: 0.19 [95% CI, .12-.29]; Baltimore: black RR, 0.38 [95% CI, .22-.64]; white RR: 0.51 [95% CI: .29-.90]). Prevalence of fluconazole resistance (7%) was unchanged compared with prior surveillance; 32 (1%) isolates were echinocandin-resistant, and 9 (8 Candida glabrata) were multidrug resistant to both fluconazole and an echinocandin. CONCLUSIONS: We describe marked shifts in candidemia epidemiology over the past 2 decades. Adults aged ≥65 years replaced infants as the highest incidence group; adjusted incidence has declined significantly in infants. Use of antifungal prophylaxis, improvements in infection control, or changes in catheter insertion practices may be contributing to these declines. Further surveillance for antifungal resistance and efforts to determine effective prevention strategies are needed.
BACKGROUND:Candidemia is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality; changes in population-based incidence rates have not been reported. METHODS: We conducted active, population-based surveillance in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, and Baltimore City/County, Maryland (combined population 5.2 million), during 2008-2011. We calculated candidemia incidence and antifungal drug resistance compared with prior surveillance (Atlanta, 1992-1993; Baltimore, 1998-2000). RESULTS: We identified 2675 cases of candidemia with 2329 isolates during 3 years of surveillance. Mean annual crude incidence per 100 000 person-years was 13.3 in Atlanta and 26.2 in Baltimore. Rates were highest among adults aged ≥65 years (Atlanta, 59.1; Baltimore, 72.4) and infants (aged <1 year; Atlanta, 34.3; Baltimore, 46.2). In both locations compared with prior surveillance, adjusted incidence significantly declined for infants of both black and white race (Atlanta: black risk ratio [RR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .17-.38]; white RR: 0.19 [95% CI, .12-.29]; Baltimore: black RR, 0.38 [95% CI, .22-.64]; white RR: 0.51 [95% CI: .29-.90]). Prevalence of fluconazole resistance (7%) was unchanged compared with prior surveillance; 32 (1%) isolates were echinocandin-resistant, and 9 (8 Candida glabrata) were multidrug resistant to both fluconazole and an echinocandin. CONCLUSIONS: We describe marked shifts in candidemia epidemiology over the past 2 decades. Adults aged ≥65 years replaced infants as the highest incidence group; adjusted incidence has declined significantly in infants. Use of antifungal prophylaxis, improvements in infection control, or changes in catheter insertion practices may be contributing to these declines. Further surveillance for antifungal resistance and efforts to determine effective prevention strategies are needed.
Authors: Eszter Deak; Kizee A Etienne; Shawn R Lockhart; Lalitha Gade; Tom Chiller; S Arunmozhi Balajee Journal: Can J Microbiol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Joseph Schulman; Rachel Stricof; Timothy P Stevens; Michael Horgan; Kathleen Gase; Ian R Holzman; Robert I Koppel; Suhas Nafday; Kathleen Gibbs; Robert Angert; Aryeh Simmonds; Susan A Furdon; Lisa Saiman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Michael A Pfaller; Daniel J Diekema; David L Gibbs; Vance A Newell; Richard Barton; Hu Bijie; Jacques Bille; Shan-Chwen Chang; Maria da Luz Martins; Adriano Duse; Danuta Dzierzanowska; David Ellis; Jorge Finquelievich; Ian Gould; Deniz Gur; Anwar Hoosen; Kyungwon Lee; Nada Mallatova; Michele Mallie; N G Kee Peng; George Petrikos; Axel Santiago; Jan Trupl; Ann Marie VanDen Abeele; Jeannette Wadula; Mussaret Zaidi Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: M H Nguyen; J E Peacock; A J Morris; D C Tanner; M L Nguyen; D R Snydman; M M Wagener; M G Rinaldi; V L Yu Journal: Am J Med Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Rana A Hajjeh; Andre N Sofair; Lee H Harrison; G Marshall Lyon; Beth A Arthington-Skaggs; Sara A Mirza; Maureen Phelan; Juliette Morgan; Wendy Lee-Yang; Meral A Ciblak; Lynette E Benjamin; Laurie Thomson Sanza; Sharon Huie; Siew Fah Yeo; Mary E Brandt; David W Warnock Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jeffrey M Rybak; C Michael Dickens; Josie E Parker; Kelly E Caudle; Kayihura Manigaba; Sarah G Whaley; Andrew T Nishimoto; Arturo Luna-Tapia; Sujoy Roy; Qing Zhang; Katherine S Barker; Glen E Palmer; Thomas R Sutter; Ramin Homayouni; Nathan P Wiederhold; Steven L Kelly; P David Rogers Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: J M Boonstra; A G Märtson; I Sandaradura; J G W Kosterink; T S van der Werf; D J E Marriott; J G Zijlstra; D J Touw; J W C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M Puig-Asensio; M Fernández-Ruiz; J M Aguado; P Merino; D Lora-Pablos; J Guinea; P Martín-Dávila; M Cuenca-Estrella; B Almirante Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ana Carolina R Souza; Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Henrique M S Pinhati; Ricardo A Siqueira; Ferry Hagen; Jacques F Meis; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Arnaldo L Colombo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 5.191