OBJECTIVE: In 2008, all 18 regional referral NICUs in New York state adopted central-line insertion and maintenance bundles and agreed to use checklists to monitor maintenance-bundle adherence and report checklist use. We sought to confirm whether adopting standardized bundles and using central-line maintenance checklists reduced central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled all neonates with a central line who were hospitalized in any of 18 NICUs. Each NICU reported CLABSI and central-line utilization data and checklist use. We used χ(2) to compare CLABSI rates in the preintervention (January to December 2007) versus the postintervention (March to December 2009) periods and Poisson regression to model adjusted CLABSI rates. RESULTS: Each study period included more than 55 000 central-line days and more than 200 000 patient-days. CLABSI rates decreased 67% statewide (risk ratio: 0.33 [95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.41]; P < .0005); after adjusting for the altered central-line-associated bloodstream infection definition in 2008, by 40% (risk ratio: 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.75]; P < .0005). A total of 13 of 18 NICUs reported using maintenance checklists for 10% to 100% of central-line days. The checklist-use rate was associated with the CLABSI rate (coefficient: -0.57, P = .04). A total of 10 of 18 NICUs were independent CLABSI rate predictors, ranging from 1 site with greatly reduced risk (incidence rate ratio: 0.04, P < .0005) to 1 site with greatly increased risk (incidence rate ratio: 2.87, P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Although standardizing central-line care elements led to a significant statewide decline in NICU CLABSIs, site of care remains an independent risk factor. Using maintenance checklists reduced CLABSIs.
OBJECTIVE: In 2008, all 18 regional referral NICUs in New York state adopted central-line insertion and maintenance bundles and agreed to use checklists to monitor maintenance-bundle adherence and report checklist use. We sought to confirm whether adopting standardized bundles and using central-line maintenance checklists reduced central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled all neonates with a central line who were hospitalized in any of 18 NICUs. Each NICU reported CLABSI and central-line utilization data and checklist use. We used χ(2) to compare CLABSI rates in the preintervention (January to December 2007) versus the postintervention (March to December 2009) periods and Poisson regression to model adjusted CLABSI rates. RESULTS: Each study period included more than 55 000 central-line days and more than 200 000 patient-days. CLABSI rates decreased 67% statewide (risk ratio: 0.33 [95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.41]; P < .0005); after adjusting for the altered central-line-associated bloodstream infection definition in 2008, by 40% (risk ratio: 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.75]; P < .0005). A total of 13 of 18 NICUs reported using maintenance checklists for 10% to 100% of central-line days. The checklist-use rate was associated with the CLABSI rate (coefficient: -0.57, P = .04). A total of 10 of 18 NICUs were independent CLABSI rate predictors, ranging from 1 site with greatly reduced risk (incidence rate ratio: 0.04, P < .0005) to 1 site with greatly increased risk (incidence rate ratio: 2.87, P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Although standardizing central-line care elements led to a significant statewide decline in NICU CLABSIs, site of care remains an independent risk factor. Using maintenance checklists reduced CLABSIs.
Authors: Michael L Rinke; David G Bundy; Aaron M Milstone; Kristin Deuber; Allen R Chen; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Marlene R Miller Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2013-08
Authors: M Guembe; A Pérez-Parra; E Gómez; M Sánchez-Luna; A Bustinza; E Zamora; A Carrillo-Álvarez; A Cuenca; B Padilla; P Martín-Rabadán; E Bouza Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Aaron M Milstone; Nicholas G Reich; Sonali Advani; Guoshu Yuan; Kristina Bryant; Susan E Coffin; W Charles Huskins; Robyn Livingston; Lisa Saiman; P Brian Smith; Xiaoyan Song Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Natalie M Pageler; Christopher A Longhurst; Matthew Wood; David N Cornfield; Jaap Suermondt; Paul J Sharek; Deborah Franzon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nansi S Boghossian; Grier P Page; Edward F Bell; Barbara J Stoll; Jeffrey C Murray; C Michael Cotten; Seetha Shankaran; Michele C Walsh; Abbot R Laptook; Nancy S Newman; Ellen C Hale; Scott A McDonald; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-01-13 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Matthew J Bizzarro; Veronika Shabanova; Robert S Baltimore; Louise-Marie Dembry; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Patrick G Gallagher Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Matthew L Basiaga; Evanette K Burrows; Michelle R Denburg; Kevin E Meyers; Andrew B Grossman; Petar Mamula; Robert W Grundmeier; Jon M Burnham Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 4.406