Literature DB >> 22893253

Uncertainty estimates of purity measurements based on current information: toward a "live validation" of purity methods.

Izydor Apostol1, Drew Kelner, Xinzhao Grace Jiang, Gang Huang, Jette Wypych, Xin Zhang, Jessica Gastwirt, Kenneth Chen, Szilan Fodor, Suminda Hapuarachchi, Dave Meriage, Frank Ye, Leszek Poppe, Wojciech Szpankowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To predict precision and other performance characteristics of chromatographic purity methods, which represent the most widely used form of analysis in the biopharmaceutical industry.
METHODS: We have conducted a comprehensive survey of purity methods, and show that all performance characteristics fall within narrow measurement ranges. This observation was used to develop a model called Uncertainty Based on Current Information (UBCI), which expresses these performance characteristics as a function of the signal and noise levels, hardware specifications, and software settings.
RESULTS: We applied the UCBI model to assess the uncertainty of purity measurements, and compared the results to those from conventional qualification. We demonstrated that the UBCI model is suitable to dynamically assess method performance characteristics, based on information extracted from individual chromatograms.
CONCLUSIONS: The model provides an opportunity for streamlining qualification and validation studies by implementing a "live validation" of test results utilizing UBCI as a concurrent assessment of measurement uncertainty. Therefore, UBCI can potentially mitigate the challenges associated with laborious conventional method validation and facilitates the introduction of more advanced analytical technologies during the method lifecycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22893253      PMCID: PMC3497960          DOI: 10.1007/s11095-012-0836-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  18 in total

1.  Validation of HPLC and GC-MS systems for bisphenol-A leached from hemodialyzers on the basis of FUMI theory.

Authors:  Yuzuru Hayashi; Rieko Matsuda; Yuji Haishima; Takeshi Yagami; Akitada Nakamura
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Precision, limit of detection and range of quantitation in competitive ELISA.

Authors:  Yuzuru Hayashi; Rieko Matsuda; Tamio Maitani; Kazuhiro Imai; Waka Nishimura; Katsutoshi Ito; Masako Maeda
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Validation in pharmaceutical analysis. Part II: Central importance of precision to establish acceptance criteria and for verifying and improving the quality of analytical data.

Authors:  Joachim Ermer; Hans-Joachim Ploss
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 3.935

5.  Least detectable concentration and dynamic range of three immunoassay systems using the same antibody.

Authors:  Thomas R Glass; Naoya Ohmura; Hiroshi Saiki
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Analytical method transfer: new descriptive approach for acceptance criteria definition.

Authors:  Gérald de Fontenay
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  Preferential exclusion of sucrose from recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: role in restricted conformational mobility and compaction of native state.

Authors:  B S Kendrick; B S Chang; T Arakawa; B Peterson; T W Randolph; M C Manning; J F Carpenter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantitation of proteins using HPLC-detector response rather than standard curve comparison.

Authors:  G A Eberlein
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.935

9.  Analysis of N-glycans from recombinant immunoglobulin G by on-line reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Chen; Gregory C Flynn
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 3.365

10.  How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein.

Authors:  C N Pace; F Vajdos; L Fee; G Grimsley; T Gray
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.