Literature DB >> 22892961

Is poker a game of skill or chance? A quasi-experimental study.

Gerhard Meyer1, Marc von Meduna, Tim Brosowski, Tobias Hayer.   

Abstract

Due to intensive marketing and the rapid growth of online gambling, poker currently enjoys great popularity among large sections of the population. Although poker is legally a game of chance in most countries, some (particularly operators of private poker web sites) argue that it should be regarded as a game of skill or sport because the outcome of the game primarily depends on individual aptitude and skill. The available findings indicate that skill plays a meaningful role; however, serious methodological weaknesses and the absence of reliable information regarding the relative importance of chance and skill considerably limit the validity of extant research. Adopting a quasi-experimental approach, the present study examined the extent to which the influence of poker playing skill was more important than card distribution. Three average players and three experts sat down at a six-player table and played 60 computer-based hands of the poker variant "Texas Hold'em" for money. In each hand, one of the average players and one expert received (a) better-than-average cards (winner's box), (b) average cards (neutral box) and (c) worse-than-average cards (loser's box). The standardized manipulation of the card distribution controlled the factor of chance to determine differences in performance between the average and expert groups. Overall, 150 individuals participated in a "fixed-limit" game variant, and 150 individuals participated in a "no-limit" game variant. ANOVA results showed that experts did not outperform average players in terms of final cash balance. Rather, card distribution was the decisive factor for successful poker playing. However, expert players were better able to minimize losses when confronted with disadvantageous conditions (i.e., worse-than-average cards). No significant differences were observed between the game variants. Furthermore, supplementary analyses confirm differential game-related actions dependent on the card distribution, player status, and game variant. In conclusion, the study findings indicate that poker should be regarded as a game of chance, at least under certain basic conditions, and suggest new directions for further research.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22892961     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-012-9327-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  5 in total

Review 1.  A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling. A biopsychosocial perspective.

Authors:  Louise Sharpe
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-02

2.  Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample.

Authors:  Richard T A Wood; Mark D Griffiths; Jonathan Parke
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2007-06

3.  "Don't worry, it's just poker!"--experience, self-rumination and self-reflection as determinants of decision-making in on-line poker.

Authors:  Jussi Palomäki; Michael Laakasuo; Mikko Salmela
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-09

4.  Social and psychological challenges of poker.

Authors:  Kyle Siler
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-09

5.  Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players.

Authors:  Jakob Linnet; Mette Frøslev; Stine Ramsgaard; Line Gebauer; Kim Mouridsen; Victoria Wohlert
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-03
  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Delusions of expertise: the high standard of proof needed to demonstrate skills at horserace handicapping.

Authors:  Matthew Browne; Matthew J Rockloff; Alex Blaszcynski; Clive Allcock; Allen Windross
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-03

2.  Daily Fantasy Football and Self-Reported Problem Behavior in the United States.

Authors:  Brendan Dwyer; Stephen L Shapiro; Joris Drayer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-09

3.  One-Year Prospective Study on Passion and Gambling Problems in Poker Players.

Authors:  Adèle Morvannou; Magali Dufour; Natacha Brunelle; Djamal Berbiche; Élise Roy
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-06

4.  Losing more by losing it: poker experience, sensitivity to losses and tilting severity.

Authors:  Jussi Palomäki; Michael Laakasuo; Mikko Salmela
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-03

5.  A Gamblers Clustering Based on Their Favorite Gambling Activity.

Authors:  Gaëlle Challet-Bouju; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Noëlle Renard; Cindy Legauffre; Marc Valleur; David Magalon; Mélina Fatséas; Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet; Mohamed-Ali Gorsane; Jean-Luc Vénisse; Marie Grall-Bronnec
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

6.  Daily Grind: A Comparison of Causality Orientations, Emotions, and Fantasy Sport Participation.

Authors:  Brendan Dwyer; James Weiner
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-03

7.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Spanish version of the Gamblers' Beliefs Questionnaire in a sample of Argentinean gamblers.

Authors:  Angelina Pilatti; Marcos Cupani; Francisco Tuzinkievich; Walter Winfree
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2016-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.