Literature DB >> 22892839

The Diversity Outbred mouse population.

Gary A Churchill1, Daniel M Gatti, Steven C Munger, Karen L Svenson.   

Abstract

The Diversity Outbred (DO) population is a heterogeneous stock derived from the same eight founder strains as the Collaborative Cross (CC) inbred strains. Genetically heterogeneous DO mice display a broad range of phenotypes. Natural levels of heterozygosity provide genetic buffering and, as a result, DO mice are robust and breed well. Genetic mapping analysis in the DO presents new challenges and opportunities. Specialized algorithms are required to reconstruct haplotypes from high-density SNP array data. The eight founder haplotypes can be combined into 36 possible diplotypes, which must be accommodated in QTL mapping analysis. Population structure of the DO must be taken into account here. Estimated allele effects of eight founder haplotypes provide information that is not available in two-parent crosses and can dramatically reduce the number of candidate loci. Allele effects can also distinguish chance colocation of QTL from pleiotropy, which provides a basis for establishing causality in expression QTL studies. We recommended sample sizes of 200-800 mice for QTL mapping studies, larger than for traditional crosses. The CC inbred strains provide a resource for independent validation of DO mapping results. Genetic heterogeneity of the DO can provide a powerful advantage in our ability to generalize conclusions to other genetically diverse populations. Genetic diversity can also help to avoid the pitfall of identifying an idiosyncratic reaction that occurs only in a limited genetic context. Informatics tools and data resources associated with the CC, the DO, and their founder strains are developing rapidly. We anticipate a flood of new results to follow as our community begins to adopt and utilize these new genetic resource populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892839      PMCID: PMC3524832          DOI: 10.1007/s00335-012-9414-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  14 in total

1.  Breeding designs for recombinant inbred advanced intercross lines.

Authors:  Matthew V Rockman; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  QTL mapping for genetic determinants of lipoprotein cholesterol levels in combined crosses of inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Henning Wittenburg; Malcolm A Lyons; Renhua Li; Ulrike Kurtz; Xiaosong Wang; Joachim Mössner; Gary A Churchill; Martin C Carey; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  Genome-wide association studies and the problem of relatedness among advanced intercross lines and other highly recombinant populations.

Authors:  Riyan Cheng; Jackie E Lim; Kaitlin E Samocha; Greta Sokoloff; Mark Abney; Andrew D Skol; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Imputation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in inbred mice using local phylogeny.

Authors:  Jeremy R Wang; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Heather A Lawson; James M Cheverud; Gary A Churchill; Leonard McMillan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Multiple trait measurements in 43 inbred mouse strains capture the phenotypic diversity characteristic of human populations.

Authors:  Karen L Svenson; Randy Von Smith; Phyllis A Magnani; Heather R Suetin; Beverly Paigen; Jürgen K Naggert; Renhua Li; Gary A Churchill; Luanne L Peters
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-02-22

6.  Complex genetic control of HDL levels in mice in response to an atherogenic diet. Coordinate regulation of HDL levels and bile acid metabolism.

Authors:  D Machleder; B Ivandic; C Welch; L Castellani; K Reue; A J Lusis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Genetic diversity and striatal gene networks: focus on the heterogeneous stock-collaborative cross (HS-CC) mouse.

Authors:  Ovidiu D Iancu; Priscila Darakjian; Nicole A R Walter; Barry Malmanger; Denesa Oberbeck; John Belknap; Shannon McWeeney; Robert Hitzemann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Hyuna Yang; Timothy A Bell; Gary A Churchill; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Hyuna Yang; Jeremy R Wang; John P Didion; Ryan J Buus; Timothy A Bell; Catherine E Welsh; François Bonhomme; Alex Hon-Tsen Yu; Michael W Nachman; Jaroslav Pialek; Priscilla Tucker; Pierre Boursot; Leonard McMillan; Gary A Churchill; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Evidence of a large-scale functional organization of mammalian chromosomes.

Authors:  Petko M Petkov; Joel H Graber; Gary A Churchill; Keith DiPetrillo; Benjamin L King; Kenneth Paigen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  198 in total

1.  Genetic Evidence for Differential Regulation of Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Thickness.

Authors:  Demelza R Koehn; Kacie J Meyer; Michael G Anderson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The Mouse Universal Genotyping Array: From Substrains to Subspecies.

Authors:  Andrew P Morgan; Chen-Ping Fu; Chia-Yu Kao; Catherine E Welsh; John P Didion; Liran Yadgary; Leeanna Hyacinth; Martin T Ferris; Timothy A Bell; Darla R Miller; Paola Giusti-Rodriguez; Randal J Nonneman; Kevin D Cook; Jason K Whitmire; Lisa E Gralinski; Mark Keller; Alan D Attie; Gary A Churchill; Petko Petkov; Patrick F Sullivan; Jennifer R Brennan; Leonard McMillan; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Candidate genetic modifiers of retinitis pigmentosa identified by exploiting natural variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Clement Y Chow; Keegan J P Kelsey; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Responsiveness of cardiometabolic-related microbiota to diet is influenced by host genetics.

Authors:  Annalouise O'Connor; Pamela M Quizon; Jody E Albright; Fred T Lin; Brian J Bennett
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  QTL mapping in outbred populations: successes and challenges.

Authors:  Leah C Solberg Woods
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 6.  High-throughput mouse phenomics for characterizing mammalian gene function.

Authors:  Steve D M Brown; Chris C Holmes; Ann-Marie Mallon; Terrence F Meehan; Damian Smedley; Sara Wells
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Nonhuman primate models in the genomic era: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Eric J Vallender; Gregory M Miller
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

Review 8.  Assessing health risks from multiple environmental stressors: Moving from G×E to I×E.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Gwendolyn Osborne; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Andrew G Salmon; Martha S Sandy; Gina Solomon; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.657

9.  Genetic Modifiers of Neurodegeneration in a Drosophila Model of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Sierra Lavoy; Vinita G Chittoor-Vinod; Clement Y Chow; Ian Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Fighting Persistence: How Chronic Infections with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Evade T Cell-Mediated Clearance and New Strategies To Defeat Them.

Authors:  Laurisa Ankley; Sean Thomas; Andrew J Olive
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.