PURPOSE: Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteines-like 1 (SPARCL1) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein with malignancy-suppressing potential. The hypothesis that SPARCL1 reduces cancer invasiveness and predicts better survival in colorectal cancers (CRC) was investigated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Stable SPARCL1 transfectants, RKO-SPARCL1, and corresponding vector control were constructed and implanted into nude mice to generate a mouse xenograft model of liver metastasis. Also, a retrospective outcome study was conducted on the COH set (222 CRCs) and ZJU set (412 CRCs). The protein expression level of SPARCL1 was determined by immunohistochemistry. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were used for survival analysis. The association of SPARCL1 with mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) was examined by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: The ectopic expression of SPARCL1 significantly reduced the potential for anchorage-independent growth, migration, invasion and induced cell differentiation in RKO and SW620 cells. In mouse xenograft model, the expression of SPARCL1 significantly reduced the liver metastasis (P < 0.01). The patient-based studies revealed that the expression of SPARCL1 was related to better differentiation (P < 0.01), less lymph node involvement [OR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-1.00], and less distant metastasis (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79). The Kaplan-Meier and Cox analysis showed that the expression of SPARCL1 was associated with better overall survival (log-rank: P < 0.01; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84). Transfection of SPARCL1 induced MET of colon cancer cells. CONCLUSION: SPARCL1 functions as a tumor suppressor promoting differentiation possibly via MET, which inhibits the aggressiveness of CRCs.
PURPOSE:Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteines-like 1 (SPARCL1) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein with malignancy-suppressing potential. The hypothesis that SPARCL1 reduces cancer invasiveness and predicts better survival in colorectal cancers (CRC) was investigated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Stable SPARCL1 transfectants, RKO-SPARCL1, and corresponding vector control were constructed and implanted into nude mice to generate a mouse xenograft model of liver metastasis. Also, a retrospective outcome study was conducted on the COH set (222 CRCs) and ZJU set (412 CRCs). The protein expression level of SPARCL1 was determined by immunohistochemistry. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were used for survival analysis. The association of SPARCL1 with mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) was examined by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: The ectopic expression of SPARCL1 significantly reduced the potential for anchorage-independent growth, migration, invasion and induced cell differentiation in RKO and SW620 cells. In mouse xenograft model, the expression of SPARCL1 significantly reduced the liver metastasis (P < 0.01). The patient-based studies revealed that the expression of SPARCL1 was related to better differentiation (P < 0.01), less lymph node involvement [OR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-1.00], and less distant metastasis (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79). The Kaplan-Meier and Cox analysis showed that the expression of SPARCL1 was associated with better overall survival (log-rank: P < 0.01; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84). Transfection of SPARCL1 induced MET of colon cancer cells. CONCLUSION:SPARCL1 functions as a tumor suppressor promoting differentiation possibly via MET, which inhibits the aggressiveness of CRCs.
Authors: Paula J Hurley; Robert M Hughes; Brian W Simons; Jessie Huang; Rebecca M Miller; Brian Shinder; Michael C Haffner; David Esopi; Yasunori Kimura; Javaneh Jabbari; Ashley E Ross; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Sheila F Faraj; Elai Davicioni; George J Netto; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Steven S An; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Joseph R McCorkle; Mary K Leonard; Susan D Kraner; Eric M Blalock; Deqin Ma; Stephen G Zimmer; David M Kaetzel Journal: Cancer Genomics Proteomics Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.069
Authors: Elisabeth Naschberger; Andrea Liebl; Vera S Schellerer; Manuela Schütz; Nathalie Britzen-Laurent; Patrick Kölbel; Ute Schaal; Lisa Haep; Daniela Regensburger; Thomas Wittmann; Ludger Klein-Hitpass; Tilman T Rau; Barbara Dietel; Valérie S Méniel; Alan R Clarke; Susanne Merkel; Roland S Croner; Werner Hohenberger; Michael Stürzl Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Yuzhu Xiang; Qingchao Qiu; Ming Jiang; Renjie Jin; Brian D Lehmann; Douglas W Strand; Bojana Jovanovic; David J DeGraff; Yi Zheng; Dina A Yousif; Christine Q Simmons; Thomas C Case; Jia Yi; Justin M Cates; John Virostko; Xiusheng He; Xunbo Jin; Simon W Hayward; Robert J Matusik; Alfred L George; Yajun Yi Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Joanna L Richens; Kelly-Ann Vere; Roger A Light; Daniele Soria; Jonathan Garibaldi; A David Smith; Donald Warden; Gordon Wilcock; Nin Bajaj; Kevin Morgan; Paul O'Shea Journal: Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet Date: 2014-05-29
Authors: M Miyo; H Yamamoto; M Konno; H Colvin; N Nishida; J Koseki; K Kawamoto; H Ogawa; A Hamabe; M Uemura; J Nishimura; T Hata; I Takemasa; T Mizushima; Y Doki; M Mori; H Ishii Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 7.640