Literature DB >> 35284267

Identifying 18F-FDG PET-metabolic radiomic signature for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis via the leveraging of prognostic transcriptomic module.

Jin Li1, Yixin Liu1,2, Wenlei Dong3, Yang Zhou1,3, Jingquan Wu1, Kuan Luan1, Lishuang Qi4.   

Abstract

Background: Imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET), which identifies molecular and metabolic abnormalities within tumor cells, could support prognostic assessment of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We aimed to develop a radiomic signature with the aid of a transcriptomic module for individualized clinical prognostic assessment of LUAD patients.
Methods: Using a gene expression profile consisting of 334 stage I-IIIA LUAD patients, prognostic-related gene coexpression modules were constructed via a weighted correlation network analysis algorithm. The robustness and prognostic performance of the coexpression modules were then tested across 2 gene expression datasets totaling 331 patients. Finally, using a discovery dataset with matched transcriptomic and 18F-FDG PET radiomic data of 15 patients and multiple linear regression analysis, we developed a PET-metabolic radiomic signature that had optimal correlation with the expression of a robust prognostic module.
Results: We selected a superior coexpression module for LUAD prognosis in which the genes were significantly enriched in important biological processes associated with tumors (e.g., cell cycle, DNA replication and p53 signaling pathway). The prognostic performance of the module for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was validated in 2 independent gene expression datasets (log-rank P<0.05). Through the leveraging of this prognostic coexpression module, a radiomic signature consisting of 3 PET features associated with metabolic processes was developed in the discovery dataset. The radiomic signature was significantly associated with patients' OS and RFS in an independent PET dataset consisting of 72 LUAD patients (OS: log-rank P=0.0006; RFS: log-rank P=0.0013). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that the radiomic signature was an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS. Furthermore, the novel proposed radiomic nomograms for OS and RFS had significantly better performance (concordance indices) than did the clinicopathological nomograms. Conclusions: The radiomic signature, which reflects biological processes in tumors (e.g., cell cycle and p53 signaling pathway), could noninvasively identify LUAD patients with poor prognosis who should receive postoperative adjuvant treatment. The signature is suitable for clinical application and could be robustly applied at an individual level across multicenter cohorts. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD); coexpression module; positron emission tomography; prognosis; radiomic signature

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284267      PMCID: PMC8899934          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  48 in total

Review 1.  The logrank test.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-01

Review 2.  Genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Siddhartha Devarakonda; Daniel Morgensztern; Ramaswamy Govindan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Degradation of CCNB1 mediated by APC11 through UBA52 ubiquitination promotes cell cycle progression and proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Fajiu Wang; Xi Chen; Xiaobo Yu; Qiang Lin
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  The significance of maximum standardized uptake values in patients with stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hyeong Ryul Kim; Dong-Jin Kim; Won Woo Lee; Sanghoon Jheon; Sook Whan Sung
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Influence of CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters on radiomic feature reproducibility.

Authors:  Abhishek Midya; Jayasree Chakraborty; Mithat Gönen; Richard K G Do; Amber L Simpson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-15

6.  Predicting response to cancer immunotherapy using noninvasive radiomic biomarkers.

Authors:  S Trebeschi; S G Drago; N J Birkbak; I Kurilova; A M Cǎlin; A Delli Pizzi; F Lalezari; D M J Lambregts; M W Rohaan; C Parmar; E A Rozeman; K J Hartemink; C Swanton; J B A G Haanen; C U Blank; E F Smit; R G H Beets-Tan; H J W L Aerts
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  A mathematical-descriptor of tumor-mesoscopic-structure from computed-tomography images annotates prognostic- and molecular-phenotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Haonan Lu; Mubarik Arshad; Andrew Thornton; Giacomo Avesani; Paula Cunnea; Ed Curry; Fahdi Kanavati; Jack Liang; Katherine Nixon; Sophie T Williams; Mona Ali Hassan; David D L Bowtell; Hani Gabra; Christina Fotopoulou; Andrea Rockall; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Distributed radiomics as a signature validation study using the Personal Health Train infrastructure.

Authors:  Zhenwei Shi; Ivan Zhovannik; Alberto Traverso; Frank J W M Dankers; Timo M Deist; Petros Kalendralis; René Monshouwer; Johan Bussink; Rianne Fijten; Hugo J W L Aerts; Andre Dekker; Leonard Wee
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach.

Authors:  Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Radiomics in predicting treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status, challenges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Madhurima R Chetan; Fergus V Gleeson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identidication of novel biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer using machine learning.

Authors:  Fangwei Wang; Qisheng Su; Chaoqian Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.