Literature DB >> 22890604

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-insights from the German experience.

Gunter von Minckwitz1.   

Abstract

New insights into neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer have shown that the prognostic value of pathological complete response has to be rated differently according to subtype. Whereas in triple-negative, HER2-positive (non-luminal) and luminal B (HER2-negative) patients with a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy show a significantly better outcome than patients without a pCR, this prognostic impact cannot be seen in patients with luminal A or luminal B (HER2-positive) tumors. Patients can therefore only avoid an initially high-risk prognosis if they have a pCR of these first mentioned subtypes. For patients with those tumors or with high Ki-67 levels in residual disease, new treatment options have to be found. Contrarily, response-guided chemotherapy, i.e., changing the regimen in case of no early response or intensification in case of early response, showed significant survival advantages only in the latter group. Strategies are currently being developed on how locoregional treatment can be reduced in patients with a pathological complete response. These aim to reduce the extent of surgery or even avoid surgery completely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890604     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-012-0393-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  10 in total

1.  AGO Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2013.

Authors:  Anton Scharl; Christoph Thomssen; Nadia Harbeck; Volkmar Müller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Imaging Considerations and Interprofessional Opportunities in the Care of Breast Cancer Patients in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Sara Harvey; Anum Syed; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.315

3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for different molecular breast cancer subtypes: a retrospective study in Russian population.

Authors:  Nataliya Babyshkina; Elena Malinovskaya; Stanislav Patalyak; Olga Bragina; Natalia Tarabanovskaya; Artem Doroshenko; Elena Slonimskaya; Vladimir Perelmuter; Nadejda Cherdyntseva
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  The Neoadjuvant Model Is Still the Future for Drug Development in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela DeMichele; Douglas Yee; Donald A Berry; Kathy S Albain; Christopher C Benz; Judy Boughey; Meredith Buxton; Stephen K Chia; Amy J Chien; Stephen Y Chui; Amy Clark; Kirsten Edmiston; Anthony D Elias; Andres Forero-Torres; Tufia C Haddad; Barbara Haley; Paul Haluska; Nola M Hylton; Claudine Isaacs; Henry Kaplan; Larissa Korde; Brian Leyland-Jones; Minetta C Liu; Michelle Melisko; Susan E Minton; Stacy L Moulder; Rita Nanda; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Melissa Paoloni; John W Park; Barbara A Parker; Jane Perlmutter; Emanuel F Petricoin; Hope Rugo; Fraser Symmans; Debasish Tripathy; Laura J van't Veer; Rebecca K Viscusi; Anne Wallace; Denise Wolf; Christina Yau; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Strong cytoplasmic expression of NF-κB/p65 correlates with a good prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Motoi Baba; Masato Takahashi; Katsushige Yamashiro; Hideki Yokoo; Moto Fukai; Masanori Sato; Mitsuchika Hosoda; Toshiya Kamiyama; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroko Yamashita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Pretreatment vitamin D level and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer on the I-SPY trial (CALGB 150007/150015/ACRIN6657).

Authors:  Amy S Clark; Jinbo Chen; Shiv Kapoor; Claire Friedman; Carolyn Mies; Laura Esserman; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Virostko; Allison Hainline; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Stephanie L Barnes; Jeffrey D Blume; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Thomas E Yankeelov; Anna G Sorace
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-24

8.  Quantitative multiparametric MRI predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in the community setting.

Authors:  John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Kalina P Slavkova; Anum S Kazerouni; Angela M Jarrett; Julie C DiCarlo; Stefanie Woodard; Sarah Avery; Boone Goodgame; Debra Patt; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  ER, PgR, Ki67, p27(Kip1), and histological grade as predictors of pathological complete response in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy using taxanes followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide concomitant with trastuzumab.

Authors:  Sasagu Kurozumi; Kenichi Inoue; Hiroyuki Takei; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Masafumi Kurosumi; Jun Horiguchi; Izumi Takeyoshi; Tetsunari Oyama
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Filipe Ramos Barra; Fernanda Freire de Souza; Rosimara Eva Ferreira Almeida Camelo; Andrea Campos de Oliveira Ribeiro; Luciano Farage
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.