Literature DB >> 22890083

Evaluation of the mRECIST and α-fetoprotein ratio for stratification of the prognosis of advanced-hepatocellular-carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib.

Tomokazu Kawaoka1, Hiroshi Aikata, Eisuke Murakami, Takashi Nakahara, Noriaki Naeshiro, Mio Tanaka, Yoji Honda, Daisuke Miyaki, Yuko Nagaoki, Shintaro Takaki, Akira Hiramatsu, Koji Waki, Shoichi Takahashi, Kazuaki Chayama.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the assessment of response and prognosis of patients to sorafenib treatment by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST (mRECIST), α-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP).
METHODS: Sixty-six patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib were enrolled in this retrospective study. The response to treatment was evaluated by RECIST, mRECIST and changes in AFP and DCP.
RESULTS: The median survival time of all patients was 8.6 months. The median time to radiological progression was 3.3 months. The response rates [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] by RECIST and mRECIST were 3.0 and 9.0%, respectively, while the disease control rates [CR + PR + stable disease (SD)] were 50 and 50%, respectively. Assessment by mRECIST of overall survival provided a better stratification of the patients according to the response to treatment (p = 0.009) than RECIST (p = 0.09). Assessment of overall survival by a change in AFP ratio of ≤ 1 at 8 weeks was better than that of >1 at 8 weeks (p = 0.002). The DCP ratio was not useful for assessment of overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified mRECIST response (CR + PR + SD; p = 0.001), AFP ratio at 8 weeks (≤ 1; p = 0.046) and Child-Pugh A before treatment (p = 0.012) as significant and independent determinants of survival. The combination of AFP ratio at 8 weeks, assessment by mRECIST and Child-Pugh score before treatment allows stratification of prognosis of patients treated with sorafenib.
CONCLUSION: The combination of mRECIST and AFP ratio is useful for the assessment of prognosis of patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890083     DOI: 10.1159/000341347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  13 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of clinical and radiological response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Rodolfo Sacco; Valeria Mismas; Antonio Romano; Marco Bertini; Michele Bertoni; Graziana Federici; Salvatore Metrangolo; Giuseppe Parisi; Emanuele Tumino; Giampaolo Bresci; Luca Giacomelli; Sara Marceglia; Irene Bargellini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-27

2.  Value of α-fetoprotein as an early biomarker for treatment response to sorafenib therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ana Isabel Plano Sánchez; Lucía Velasco Roces; Isabel Zapico García; Eva Lázaro López; Miguel Angel Calleja Hernandez; Maria Isabel Baena Parejo; Jaime Peña-Díaz
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Computed tomograpy evaluation of morphological changes, clinical response and survival in colorectal cancer liver metastasis treated by regorafenib: A case report.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Junko Kato; Toshiyuki Tanahashi; Satoshi Matsui; Yoshiyuki Sasaki; Hisashi Imai; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Manabu Futamura; Shinji Osada; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-05

4.  Early Clinical Response after 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Outcomes and Anti-Tumor Response in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Teiji Kuzuya; Masatoshi Ishigami; Yoji Ishizu; Takashi Honda; Kazuhiko Hayashi; Yoshiaki Katano; Yoshiki Hirooka; Tetsuya Ishikawa; Isao Nakano; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  How to assess the efficacy or failure of targeted therapy: Deciding when to stop sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Raoul; Xavier Adhoute; Marine Gilabert; Julien Edeline
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-18

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging following treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib.

Authors:  Joon-Il Choi; David K Imagawa; Priya Bhosale; Puneet Bhargava; Temel Tirkes; Tara E Seery; Chandana Lall
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Early α-fetoprotein response predicts survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

Authors:  Sangheun Lee; Beom Kyung Kim; Seung Up Kim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 8.  Challenges of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefano Colagrande; Andrea L Inghilesi; Sami Aburas; Gian G Taliani; Cosimo Nardi; Fabio Marra
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Juichi Takada; Hisashi Hidaka; Takahide Nakazawa; Masaaki Kondo; Kazushi Numata; Katsuaki Tanaka; Kotaro Matsunaga; Chiaki Okuse; Satoshi Kobayashi; Manabu Morimoto; Shinichi Ohkawa; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  Treatment response after radioembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma-An evaluation with dual energy computed-tomography.

Authors:  Jens Altenbernd; Axel Wetter; Michael Forsting; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.