Literature DB >> 25624994

Assessment of clinical and radiological response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Rodolfo Sacco1, Valeria Mismas1, Antonio Romano1, Marco Bertini1, Michele Bertoni1, Graziana Federici1, Salvatore Metrangolo1, Giuseppe Parisi1, Emanuele Tumino1, Giampaolo Bresci1, Luca Giacomelli1, Sara Marceglia1, Irene Bargellini1.   

Abstract

Sorafenib is an effective anti-angiogenic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The assessment of tumor progression in patients treated with sorafenib is crucial to help identify potentially-resistant patients, avoiding unnecessary toxicities. Traditional methods to assess tumor progression are based on variations in tumor size and provide unreliable results in patients treated with sorafenib. New methods to assess tumor progression such as the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or European Association for the Study of Liver criteria are based on imaging to measure the vascularization and tumor volume (viable or necrotic). These however fail especially when the tumor response results in irregular development of necrotic tissue. Newer assessment techniques focus on the evaluation of tumor volume, density or perfusion. Perfusion computed tomography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-UltraSound can measure the vascularization of HCC lesions and help predict tumor response to anti-angiogenic therapies. Mean Transit Time is a possible predictive biomarker to measure tumor response. Volumetric techniques are reliable, reproducible and time-efficient and can help measure minimal changes in viable tumor or necrotic tissue, allowing the prompt identification of non-responders. Volume ratio may be a reproducible biomarker for tumor response. Larger trials are needed to confirm the use of these techniques in the prediction of response to sorafenib.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-UltraSound; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Perfusion computed tomography; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Sorafenib; Volumetric assessment

Year:  2015        PMID: 25624994      PMCID: PMC4295191          DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Hepatol


  54 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Treatment planning and volumetric response assessment for Yttrium-90 radioembolization: semiautomated determination of liver volume and volume of tumor necrosis in patients with hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Wayne L Monsky; Armando S Garza; Isaac Kim; Shaun Loh; Tzu-Chun Lin; Chin-Shang Li; Jerron Fisher; Parmbir Sandhu; Vishal Sidhar; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Frank Lin; Larry-Stuart Deutsch; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Assessment of response to sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using perfusion computed tomography: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Rodolfo Sacco; Lorenzo Faggioni; Irene Bargellini; Barbara Ginanni; Valentina Battaglia; Antonio Romano; Marco Bertini; Giampaolo Bresci; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.088

4.  MDCT necrosis quantification in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to yttrium 90 radioembolization therapy: comparison of two-dimensional and volumetric techniques.

Authors:  Mauricio Stanzione Galizia; Hüseyin Gürkan Töre; Hamid Chalian; Robert McCarthy; Riad Salem; Vahid Yaghmai
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Use of VEGFR-2 targeted ultrasound contrast agent for the early evaluation of response to sorafenib in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Marco Baron Toaldo; Veronica Salvatore; Sara Marinelli; Chiara Palamà; Maddalena Milazzo; Luca Croci; Laura Venerandi; Mario Cipone; Luigi Bolondi; Fabio Piscaglia
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexandre Liccioni; Maria Reig; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.404

7.  A mesenchymal-like phenotype and expression of CD44 predict lack of apoptotic response to sorafenib in liver tumor cells.

Authors:  Joan Fernando; Andrea Malfettone; Edgar B Cepeda; Roser Vilarrasa-Blasi; Esther Bertran; Giulia Raimondi; Àngels Fabra; Alberto Alvarez-Barrientos; Pedro Fernández-Salguero; Conrado M Fernández-Rodríguez; Gianluigi Giannelli; Patricia Sancho; Isabel Fabregat
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy.

Authors:  I M E Desar; C M L van Herpen; H W M van Laarhoven; J O Barentsz; W J G Oyen; W T A van der Graaf
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Early antiangiogenic activity of bevacizumab evaluated by computed tomography perfusion scan in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew X Zhu; Nagaraj S Holalkere; Alona Muzikansky; Kerry Horgan; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-02

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging following treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib.

Authors:  Joon-Il Choi; David K Imagawa; Priya Bhosale; Puneet Bhargava; Temel Tirkes; Tara E Seery; Chandana Lall
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Prediction of Response to Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Putative Marker Panel by Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry (MRM-MS).

Authors:  Hyunsoo Kim; Su Jong Yu; Injun Yeo; Young Youn Cho; Dong Hyeon Lee; Yuri Cho; Eun Ju Cho; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Yoon Jun Kim; Sungyoung Lee; Jongsoo Jun; Taesung Park; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Youngsoo Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Towards a tailored systemic therapy for liver cancer.

Authors:  Rodolfo Sacco; Antonio Facciorusso
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

3.  RECIST 1.1 versus mRECIST for assessment of tumour response to molecular targeted therapies and disease outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongli Yu; Yuping Bai; Xiaoyu Xie; Yuemin Feng; Yao Yang; Qiang Zhu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Mass-Forming and Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinomas > 5 cm: Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Gisele N'Kontchou; Jean-Charles Nault; Olivier Sutter; Valerie Bourcier; Emmanuelle Coderc; Veronique Grando; Pierre Nahon; Nathalie Ganne-Carrié; Abou Diallo; Nicolas Sellier; Olivier Seror
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 11.740

5.  Non-secretion of AFP and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio as predictors for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib: a large UK cohort.

Authors:  Yuk Ting Ma; Pankaj Punia; Mehran Afshar; Peter Fletcher; Antonio D Bardoli
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.