Literature DB >> 22888175

The effects of L2 proficiency level on the processing of wh-questions among Dutch second language speakers of English.

Carrie N Jackson1, Janet G van Hell.   

Abstract

Using a self-paced reading task, the present study explores how Dutch-English L2 speakers parse English wh-subject-extractions and wh-object-extractions. Results suggest that English native speakers and highly-proficient Dutch-English L2 speakers do not always exhibit measurable signs of on-line reanalysis when reading subject- versus object-extractions in English. However, less-proficient Dutch-English L2 speakers exhibit greater processing costs on subject-extractions relative to object-extractions, similar to previously reported findings (e.g., Dussias and Piñar, forthcoming; Juffs 2005; Juffs and Harrington 1995). These findings are discussed in light of relevant research surrounding on-line processing among L2 speakers and their ability to adopt native-like processing patterns in the L2.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22888175      PMCID: PMC3413290          DOI: 10.1515/iral.2011.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IRAL Int Rev Appl Linguist Lang Teach        ISSN: 0019-042X


  7 in total

1.  Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment.

Authors:  M J Pickering; M J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The Effect of Different Forms of Centering in Hierarchical Linear Models.

Authors:  I G Kreft; J de Leeuw; L S Aiken
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: foundations and illustrative examples.

Authors:  Lesa Hoffman; Michael J Rovine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-02

4.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

6.  Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish.

Authors:  F Cuetos; D C Mitchell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-10

7.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter; J D Woolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-06
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Tasks in Processing L2 Complex Sentence: Evidence from Chinese-English Bilinguals.

Authors:  Huixia Zhou; Sonja Rossi; Baoguo Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-20

2.  Differences in Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Processing of Center-Embedded and Non-embedded Musical Structures.

Authors:  Xie Ma; Nai Ding; Yun Tao; Yu Fang Yang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.