Literature DB >> 22888083

An interinstitutional review of the value of FNAB in pediatric oncology in resource-limited countries.

Rubina Razack1, Pamela Michelow, Gladwyn Leiman, Anwari Harnekar, Janet Poole, Glynn Wessels, Peter Hesseling, Cristina Stefan, Mercia Louw, Pawel T Schubert, Herchel Clarke, Colleen A Wright.   

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has been widely accepted as a reliable diagnostic modality in the general pediatric population, but its role in pediatric oncology still remains elusive. With new treatment protocols subscribing to preoperative chemotherapy, the need for a quick, minimally invasive, and accurate diagnostic procedure has arisen. This study assesses the feasibility of FNAB in childhood malignancies to render a specific diagnosis on which treatment can be initiated. An 11-year retrospective study was done on FNABs in patients 19 years and under referred for clinically malignant mass lesions. Cases were confirmed with histology, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, or clinical follow-up. Of the 357 patients referred for FNABs, 36 patients were lost to follow-up and 31 FNABS were inadequate. A total of 290 cases were included in the study, of which 68 (23%) cases were benign and 222 (77%) were malignant. The most frequently occurring tumors were nephroblastoma (68), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (39), rhabdomyosarcoma (22), Hodgkin's lymphoma (22), and neuroblastoma (22). The sensitivity of the procedure for neoplasia was 96.6%, the specificity 97.0%, positive predictive value 99.0%, and negative predictive value 90.1%, with a diagnostic accuracy of 96.7%. The ability of FNAB to enable a specific diagnosis to be made, that is correct and accurate subtyping of the tumor on which chemotherapy or radiotherapy could be commenced was 75.7%. This study shows that FNAB can be used with confidence to confirm malignancy in children. With clinicoradiological correlation and the aid of ancillary techniques, FNAB allows a rapid and accurate preoperative diagnosis for definitive therapy commencement in most cases.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22888083     DOI: 10.1002/dc.21624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  4 in total

1.  Spectrum of pediatric tumors diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  Sadegh Shirian; Yahya Daneshbod; Sezaneh Haghpanah; Bijan Khademi; Farshid Noorbakhsh; Amir Ghaemi; Ziba Mosayebi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Utilization of fine needle aspiration cytology at Kamuzu central hospital.

Authors:  Shiraz Khan; George Liomba; Nora E Rosenberg; Christopher Stanley; Cocxilly Kampani; Bal Mukunda Dhungel; Mina C Hosseinipour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy in pediatric small round cell tumors.

Authors:  Marrium Asim; Ghazala Mudassir; Atif Ali Hashmi; Mariam Abid; Ahmareen Khalid Sheikh; Hania Naveed; Maryam Habib; Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi; Amir Khan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-08-13

4.  Fine-needle aspiration as an alternative to core needle biopsy for tumour molecular profiling in precision oncology: prospective comparative study of next-generation sequencing in cancer patients included in the SHIVA02 trial.

Authors:  Célia Dupain; Julien Masliah-Planchon; Céline Gu; Elodie Girard; Pierre Gestraud; Pauline Du Rusquec; Edith Borcoman; Diana Bello; Francesco Ricci; Ségolène Hescot; Marie-Paule Sablin; Patricia Tresca; Alexandre de Moura; Delphine Loirat; Maxime Frelaut; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Charlotte Lecerf; Céline Callens; Samantha Antonio; Coralie Franck; Odette Mariani; Ivan Bièche; Maud Kamal; Christophe Le Tourneau; Vincent Servois
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.