BACKGROUND: A pediatric Phase I trial was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorinostat and bortezomib, in patients with solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Oral vorinostat was administered on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle (starting dose 180 mg/m(2) /day with dose escalations to 230 and 300 mg/m(2) /day). Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) i.v.) was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of the same cycle. PK and correlative biology studies were performed during Cycle 1. RESULTS: Twenty-three eligible patients [17 male, median age 12 years (range: 1-20)] were enrolled of whom 17 were fully evaluable for toxicity. Cycle 1 DLTs that occurred in 2/6 patients at dose level 3 (vorinostat 300 mg/m(2) /day) were Grade 2 sensory neuropathy that progressed to Grade 4 (n = 1) and Grade 3 nausea and anorexia (n = 1). No objective responses were observed. There was wide interpatient variability in vorinostat PK parameters. Bortezomib disposition was best described by a three-compartment model that demonstrated rapid distribution followed by prolonged elimination. We did not observe a decrease in nuclear factor-κB activity or Grp78 induction after bortezomib treatment in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from solid tumor patients. CONCLUSION: The recommended Phase 2 dose and schedule is vorinostat (230 mg/m(2) /day PO on days 1-5 and 8-12) in combination with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) /day i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle) in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors.
BACKGROUND: A pediatric Phase I trial was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorinostat and bortezomib, in patients with solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Oral vorinostat was administered on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle (starting dose 180 mg/m(2) /day with dose escalations to 230 and 300 mg/m(2) /day). Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) i.v.) was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of the same cycle. PK and correlative biology studies were performed during Cycle 1. RESULTS: Twenty-three eligible patients [17 male, median age 12 years (range: 1-20)] were enrolled of whom 17 were fully evaluable for toxicity. Cycle 1 DLTs that occurred in 2/6 patients at dose level 3 (vorinostat 300 mg/m(2) /day) were Grade 2 sensory neuropathy that progressed to Grade 4 (n = 1) and Grade 3 nausea and anorexia (n = 1). No objective responses were observed. There was wide interpatient variability in vorinostat PK parameters. Bortezomib disposition was best described by a three-compartment model that demonstrated rapid distribution followed by prolonged elimination. We did not observe a decrease in nuclear factor-κB activity or Grp78 induction after bortezomib treatment in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from solid tumorpatients. CONCLUSION: The recommended Phase 2 dose and schedule is vorinostat (230 mg/m(2) /day PO on days 1-5 and 8-12) in combination with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) /day i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle) in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors.
Authors: Till Milde; Susanne Kleber; Andrey Korshunov; Hendrik Witt; Thomas Hielscher; Philipp Koch; Hans-Georg Kopp; Manfred Jugold; Hedwig E Deubzer; Ina Oehme; Marco Lodrini; Hermann-Josef Gröne; Axel Benner; Oliver Brüstle; Richard J Gilbertson; Andreas von Deimling; Andreas E Kulozik; Stefan M Pfister; Ana Martin-Villalba; Olaf Witt Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: J Adams; V J Palombella; E A Sausville; J Johnson; A Destree; D D Lazarus; J Maas; C S Pien; S Prakash; P J Elliott Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Teru Hideshima; James E Bradner; Jason Wong; Dharminder Chauhan; Paul Richardson; Stuart L Schreiber; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: R D Glick; S L Swendeman; D C Coffey; R A Rifkind; P A Marks; V M Richon; M P La Quaglia Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Susan M Blaney; Mark Bernstein; Kathleen Neville; Jill Ginsberg; Brenda Kitchen; Terzah Horton; Stacey L Berg; Mark Krailo; Peter C Adamson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Constantine S Mitsiades; Nicholas S Mitsiades; Ciaran J McMullan; Vassiliki Poulaki; Reshma Shringarpure; Teru Hideshima; Masaharu Akiyama; Dharminder Chauhan; Nikhil Munshi; Xuesong Gu; Charles Bailey; Marie Joseph; Towia A Libermann; Victoria M Richon; Paul A Marks; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-12-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexia Klonou; Danai Spiliotakopoulou; Marios S Themistocleous; Christina Piperi; Athanasios G Papavassiliou Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2018-06
Authors: Julie M Janssen; T P C Dorlo; D Niewerth; A J Wilhelm; C M Zwaan; J H Beijnen; A Attarbaschi; A Baruchel; F Fagioli; T Klingebiel; B De Moerloose; G Palumbo; A von Stackelberg; G J L Kaspers; A D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Neerav Shukla; Romel Somwar; Roger S Smith; Sri Ambati; Stanley Munoz; Melinda Merchant; Padraig D'Arcy; Xin Wang; Rachel Kobos; Christophe Antczak; Bhavneet Bhinder; David Shum; Constantin Radu; Guangbin Yang; Barry S Taylor; Charlotte K Y Ng; Britta Weigelt; Inna Khodos; Elisa de Stanchina; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Stig Linder; Hakim Djaballah; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Terzah M Horton; John P Perentesis; Alan S Gamis; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Jennifer Ballard; Kathleen Adlard; Dianna S Howard; Franklin O Smith; Gaye Jenkins; Angelé Kelder; Gerrit J Schuurhuis; Jeffrey A Moscow Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-06-29 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Daniel Moj; Hannah Britz; Jürgen Burhenne; Clinton F Stewart; Gerlinde Egerer; Walter E Haefeli; Thorsten Lehr Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-07 Impact factor: 3.333