Literature DB >> 22887094

Separation technologies for stem cell bioprocessing.

Maria Margarida Diogo1, Cláudia Lobato da Silva, Joaquim M S Cabral.   

Abstract

Stem cells have been the focus of an intense research due to their potential in Regenerative Medicine, drug discovery, toxicology studies, as well as for fundamental studies on developmental biology and human disease mechanisms. To fully accomplish this potential, the successful application of separation processes for the isolation and purification of stem cells and stem cell-derived cells is a crucial issue. Although separation methods have been used over the past decades for the isolation and enrichment of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells for transplantation in hemato-oncological settings, recent achievements in the stem cell field have created new challenges including the need for novel scalable separation processes with a higher resolution and more cost-effective. Important examples are the need for high-resolution methods for the separation of heterogeneous populations of multipotent adult stem cells to study their differential biological features and clinical utility, as well as for the depletion of tumorigenic cells after pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Focusing on these challenges, this review presents a critical assessment of separation processes that have been used in the stem cell field, as well as their current and potential applications. The techniques are grouped according to the fundamental principles that govern cell separation, which are defined by the main physical, biophysical, and affinity properties of cells. A special emphasis is given to novel and promising approaches such as affinity-based methods that take advantage of the use of new ligands (e.g., aptamers, lectins), as well as to novel biophysical-based methods requiring no cell labeling and integrated with microscale technologies.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22887094     DOI: 10.1002/bit.24706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  11 in total

Review 1.  Dendritic cells derived from pluripotent stem cells: Potential of large scale production.

Authors:  Yan Li; Meimei Liu; Shang-Tian Yang
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Advances in cell culture: anchorage dependence.

Authors:  Otto-Wilhelm Merten
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A global assessment of stem cell engineering.

Authors:  Jeanne F Loring; Todd C McDevitt; Sean P Palecek; David V Schaffer; Peter W Zandstra; Robert M Nerem
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Stem cell bioprocess engineering towards cGMP production and clinical applications.

Authors:  Sébastien Sart; Yves-Jacques Schneider; Yan Li; Spiros N Agathos
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Combined flow cytometric analysis of surface and intracellular antigens reveals surface molecule markers of human neuropoiesis.

Authors:  Gizem Turaç; Christopher J Hindley; Ria Thomas; Jason A Davis; Michela Deleidi; Thomas Gasser; Erdal Karaöz; Jan Pruszak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Defined and Scalable Differentiation of Human Oligodendrocyte Precursors from Pluripotent Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System.

Authors:  Gonçalo M C Rodrigues; Thomas Gaj; Maroof M Adil; Joyce Wahba; Antara T Rao; Franziska K Lorbeer; Rishi U Kulkarni; Maria Margarida Diogo; Joaquim M S Cabral; Evan W Miller; Dirk Hockemeyer; David V Schaffer
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 7.765

7.  Catch-and-Release of Target Cells Using Aptamer-Conjugated Electroactive Zwitterionic Oligopeptide SAM.

Authors:  Junko Enomoto; Tatsuto Kageyama; Tatsuya Osaki; Flavia Bonalumi; Francesca Marchese; Alfonso Gautieri; Elena Bianchi; Gabriele Dubini; Chiara Arrigoni; Matteo Moretti; Junji Fukuda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Biophysical subsets of embryonic stem cells display distinct phenotypic and morphological signatures.

Authors:  Tom Bongiorno; Jeremy Gura; Priyanka Talwar; Dwight Chambers; Katherine M Young; Dalia Arafat; Gonghao Wang; Emily L Jackson-Holmes; Peng Qiu; Todd C McDevitt; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Defining Lineage-Specific Membrane Fluidity Signatures that Regulate Adhesion Kinetics.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuzaki; Shinya Matsumoto; Toshiharu Kasai; Emi Yoshizawa; Satoshi Okamoto; Hiroshi Y Yoshikawa; Hideki Taniguchi; Takanori Takebe
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 7.765

10.  CRISPR-mediated gene modification of hematopoietic stem cells with beta-thalassemia IVS-1-110 mutation.

Authors:  Hala Gabr; Mona Kamal El Ghamrawy; Abdulrahman H Almaeen; Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz; Aya Osama Saad Hassan; Maha Hamdi El Sissy
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.