Literature DB >> 22886724

MRI-related static magnetic stray fields and postural body sway: a double-blind randomized crossover study.

Lotte E van Nierop1, Pauline Slottje, Herman Kingma, Hans Kromhout.   

Abstract

We assessed postural body sway performance after exposure to movement induced time-varying magnetic fields in the static magnetic stray field in front of a 7 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Using a double blind randomized crossover design, 30 healthy volunteers performed two balance tasks (i.e., standing with eyes closed and feet in parallel and then in tandem position) after standardized head movements in a sham, low exposure (on average 0.24 T static magnetic stray field and 0.49 T·s(-1) time-varying magnetic field) and high exposure condition (0.37 T and 0.70 T·s(-1)). Personal exposure to static magnetic stray fields and time-varying magnetic fields was measured with a personal dosimeter. Postural body sway was expressed in sway path, area, and velocity. Mixed-effects model regression analysis showed that postural body sway in the parallel task was negatively affected (P < 0.05) by exposure on all three measures. The tandem task revealed the same trend, but did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are needed to investigate the possibility of independent or synergetic effects of static magnetic stray field and time-varying magnetic field exposure. In addition, practical safety implications of these findings, e.g., for surgeons and others working near magnetic resonance imaging scanners need to be investigated.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886724     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  12 in total

1.  Impact of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on human postural control.

Authors:  Sebastien Villard; Alicia Allen; Nicolas Bouisset; Michael Corbacio; Alex Thomas; Michel Guerraz; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Transient health symptoms of MRI staff working with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla scanners in the UK.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Evridiki Batistatou; Anna Mölter; Hans Kromhout; Kristel Schaap; Martie van Tongeren; Stuart Crozier; Penny Gowland; Stephen Keevil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  10.5 T MRI static field effects on human cognitive, vestibular, and physiological function.

Authors:  Andrea Grant; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Cheryl Olman; Lin Zhang; Joseph Koopermeiners; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Margaret Koeritzer; Meredith E Adams; Thomas R Henry; Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Short-term side-effects of brain MR examination at 7 T: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  M Cosottini; D Frosini; L Biagi; I Pesaresi; M Costagli; G Tiberi; M Symms; M Tosetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Vestibular effects of a 7 Tesla MRI examination compared to 1.5 T and 0 T in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jens M Theysohn; Oliver Kraff; Kristina Eilers; Dorian Andrade; Marcus Gerwig; Dagmar Timmann; Franz Schmitt; Mark E Ladd; Susanne C Ladd; Andreas K Bitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  On the subjective acceptance during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Sabrina Klix; Antje Els; Katharina Paul; Andreas Graessl; Celal Oezerdem; Oliver Weinberger; Lukas Winter; Christof Thalhammer; Till Huelnhagen; Jan Rieger; Heidrun Mehling; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-Ionizing Radiation in Swedish Health Care-Exposure and Safety Aspects.

Authors:  Kjell Hansson Mild; Ronnie Lundström; Jonna Wilén
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI procedures in clinical practice in the UK.

Authors:  Evridiki Batistatou; Anna Mölter; Hans Kromhout; Martie van Tongeren; Stuart Crozier; Kristel Schaap; Penny Gowland; Stephen F Keevil; Frank de Vocht
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.