Literature DB >> 22884947

How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals' demand for health care services?

Agne Suziedelyte1.   

Abstract

The emergence of the Internet made health information, which previously was almost exclusively available to health professionals, accessible to the general public. Access to health information on the Internet is likely to affect individuals' health care related decisions. The aim of this analysis is to determine how health information that people obtain from the Internet affects their demand for health care. I use a novel data set, the U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey (2003-07), to answer this question. The causal variable of interest is a binary variable that indicates whether or not an individual has recently searched for health information on the Internet. Health care utilization is measured by an individual's number of visits to a health professional in the past 12 months. An individual's decision to use the Internet to search for health information is likely to be correlated to other variables that can also affect his/her demand for health care. To separate the effect of Internet health information from other confounding variables, I control for a number of individual characteristics and use the instrumental variable estimation method. As an instrument for Internet health information, I use U.S. state telecommunication regulations that are shown to affect the supply of Internet services. I find that searching for health information on the Internet has a positive, relatively large, and statistically significant effect on an individual's demand for health care. This effect is larger for the individuals who search for health information online more frequently and people who have health care coverage. Among cancer patients, the effect of Internet health information seeking on health professional visits varies by how long ago they were diagnosed with cancer. Thus, the Internet is found to be a complement to formal health care rather than a substitute for health professional services.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22884947     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  23 in total

1.  Big Data: Will It Improve Patient-Centered Care?

Authors:  Denzil G Fiebig
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Prevalence and correlates of health information-seeking among Hispanic and non-Hispanic childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Miller; Cynthia N Ramirez; Katherine Y Wojcik; Anamara Ritt-Olson; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Stefanie M Thomas; David R Freyer; Ann S Hamilton; Joel E Milam
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Sexual Orientation and Health Information Technology Use: A Nationally Representative Study of U.S. Adults.

Authors:  James M Dahlhamer; Adena M Galinsky; Sarah S Joestl; Brian W Ward
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.151

4.  Comparing Older and Younger Adults Perceptions of Voice and Text-based Search for Consumer Health Information Tasks.

Authors:  Karen Bonilla; Brian Gaitan; Jamie Sanders; Noami Khenglawt; Aqueasha Martin-Hammond
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Beyond access: barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor.

Authors:  Rachel F McCloud; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Glorian Sorensen; K Viswanath
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Scientific and ethical features of English-language online tests for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Judy Illes; Marcel Arcand; B Lynn Beattie; Sherri Hayden; Peter Lawrence; Joanna McGrenere; Peter B Reiner; Dana Wittenberg; Claudia Jacova
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Effect of an evidence-based website on healthcare usage: an interrupted time-series study.

Authors:  Wouter A Spoelman; Tobias N Bonten; Margot W M de Waal; Ton Drenthen; Ivo J M Smeele; Markus M J Nielen; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Fabia Rothenfluh; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Florian Meier; Frank Pisch; Uwe Sander
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Indirect effects of contextual factors on patients' consultations with healthcare professionals about health information found online.

Authors:  Younsook Yeo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.