Literature DB >> 22884611

Objective and subjective cognitive enhancing effects of mixed amphetamine salts in healthy people.

Irena Ilieva1, Joseph Boland, Martha J Farah.   

Abstract

Psychostimulants such as mixed amphetamine salts (MAS, brand name Adderall) are widely used for cognitive enhancement by healthy young people, yet laboratory research on effectiveness has yielded variable results. The present study assessed the effects of MAS in healthy young adults with an adequately powered double-blind cross-over placebo-controlled trial. We examined effects in 13 measures of cognitive ability including episodic memory, working memory, inhibitory control, convergent creativity, intelligence and scholastic achievement, with the goals of determining (1) whether the drug is at least moderately enhancing (Cohen's d >= .5) to some or all cognitive abilities tested, (2) whether its effects on cognition are moderated by baseline ability or COMT genotype, and (3) whether it induces an illusory perception of cognitive enhancement. The results did not reveal enhancement of any cognitive abilities by MAS for participants in general. There was a suggestion of moderation of enhancement by baseline ability and COMT genotype in a minority of tasks, with MAS enhancing lower ability participants on word recall, embedded figures and Raven's Progressive Matrices. Despite the lack of enhancement observed for most measures and most participants, participants nevertheless believed their performance was more enhanced by the active capsule than by placebo. We conclude that MAS has no more than small effects on cognition in healthy young adults, although users may perceive the drug as enhancing their cognition. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22884611     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  33 in total

Review 1.  Globalization and cognitive enhancement: emerging social and ethical challenges for ADHD clinicians.

Authors:  Ilina Singh; Angela M Filipe; Imre Bard; Meredith Bergey; Lauren Baker
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Perceived academic benefit is associated with nonmedical prescription stimulant use among college students.

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Irene M Geisner; M Dolores Cimini; Jason R Kilmer; Kimberly M Caldeira; Angelica L Barrall; Kathryn B Vincent; Nicole Fossos-Wong; Jih-Cheng Yeh; Isaac Rhew; Christine M Lee; Geetha A Subramaniam; David Liu; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Medication: the smart-pill oversell.

Authors:  Katherine Sharpe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The Addition of Amphetamine to Potentially Sedating Medication Regimens: An Exploratory Investigation of the Impact upon Reaction Time and Sustained Attention.

Authors:  James W Price
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2017-05-15

5.  Amphetamine Modestly Improves Conners' Continuous Performance Test Performance in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  David A MacQueen; Arpi Minassian; Brook L Henry; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young; William Perry
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 6.  Prescription stimulant medication misuse: Where are we and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Lisa L Weyandt; Danielle R Oster; Marisa E Marraccini; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir; Bailey A Munro; Emma S Rathkey; Alison McCallum
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Improvement of attention with amphetamine in low- and high-performing rats.

Authors:  Karly M Turner; Thomas H J Burne
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Do college students improve their grades by using prescription stimulants nonmedically?

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kathryn B Vincent; Kevin E O'Grady; M Dolores Cimini; Irene M Geisner; Nicole Fossos-Wong; Jason R Kilmer; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 9.  Neurocognitive enhancement or impairment? A systematic meta-analysis of prescription stimulant effects on processing speed, decision-making, planning, and cognitive perseveration.

Authors:  Marisa E Marraccini; Lisa L Weyandt; Joseph S Rossi; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  Efficacy of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in non-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder youth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kara Simone Bagot; Yifrah Kaminer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.