Literature DB >> 22884515

Comparison of the 2007 and 2011 appropriate use criteria for transesophageal echocardiography.

R Sacha Bhatia1, Dana M Carne, Michael H Picard, Rory B Weiner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2007 appropriate use criteria (AUC) for echocardiography were revised in 2011 to cover a wider range of scenarios of use. The aim of this study was to compare the 2011 AUC with the 2007 AUC to determine if the 2011 AUC better classify transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and to determine the impact of the 2011 AUC on the rates of appropriate and inappropriate TEE at an academic medical center.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to examine inpatient and outpatient TEE utilization. TEE ordering behavior was compared using both the 2007 and 2011 AUC, and studies were classified as appropriate, uncertain, inappropriate, or not classifiable.
RESULTS: We reviewed 202 consecutive transesophageal echocardiographic studies (154 inpatient, 48 outpatient) performed in 2011. Using the 2007 AUC, 166 studies (82%) were classifiable, and using the 2011 AUC, 199 (99%) were classifiable (P < .001). Among the classified studies, the percentage of appropriate studies using the 2007 AUC was 94% and using the 2011 AUC was 95% (P = .68). Using 2007 and 2011 AUC, the percentages of inappropriate studies were 0% and 4% (P = .02), and the percentages of uncertain studies were 6% and 1% (P = .006), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2011 AUC classify a significantly greater proportion of transesophageal echocardiographic studies than the 2007 AUC. The rate of inappropriate studies using the 2011 AUC is higher than when using the 2007 AUC. These findings suggest that the expanded AUC offer an opportunity for improvement in the utilization of TEE.
Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22884515     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  5 in total

1.  Towards Robot-Assisted Echocardiographic Monitoring in Catheterization Laboratories : Usability-Centered Manipulator for Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Authors:  Christina Pahl; Henning Ebelt; Mostafa Sayahkarajy; Eko Supriyanto; Amiliana Soesanto
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at the Institute of Cardiology in Abidjan: indications, results and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Anzouan-Kacou; Christophe Konin; Charles-Philippe Zobo; Djenamba Bamba-Kamagaté; Marie-Paule N'cho-Mottoh; Bénédicte Boka
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 1.167

3.  Assessment of inpatient multimodal cardiac imaging appropriateness at large academic medical centers.

Authors:  Andrew Remfry; Howard Abrams; David M Dudzinski; Rory B Weiner; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.062

4.  How I do it: judging appropriateness for TTE and TEE.

Authors:  Ricardo Fonseca; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.062

5.  [The role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE): case study conducted at the Dax Hospital Center].

Authors:  Jean Timnou Bekouti; Manitra Rambolarimanana; Akuvi Claude Adossou; Mialy Ravakiniaina Ranaivosoa; Roberto Prudencio; Pierre Bolarin Lawani; Alain Ranjatson; Alpha Diawara; Jean Louis Roynard
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.