| Literature DB >> 22883166 |
Blair D Johnson1, Kieren J Mather, Sean C Newcomer, Timothy D Mickleborough, Janet P Wallace.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute doses of elevated retrograde shear rate (SR) appear to be detrimental to endothelial function in resting humans. However, retrograde shear increases during moderate intensity exercise which also enhances post-exercise endothelial function. Since SR patterns differ with the modality of exercise, it is important to determine if augmented retrograde SR during exercise influences post-exercise endothelial function. This study tested the hypothesis that (1) increased doses of retrograde SR in the brachial artery during lower body supine cycle ergometer exercise would attenuate post-exercise flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in a dose-dependent manner, and (2) antioxidant vitamin C supplementation would prevent the attenuated post-exercise FMD response.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22883166 PMCID: PMC3492050 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Retrograde, antegrade, and mean blood velocity at baseline and during exercise
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retrograde BV (cm/s) | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 2.6 ± 0.51 | 2.6 ± 0.57 | 10.1 ± 1.10^ | 11.0 ± 1.34^* |
| 40 mmHg | 2.4 ± 0.42 | 2.3 ± 0.54 | 9.8 ± 0.98^ | 13.4 ± 1.20^* |
| 60 mmHg | 2.9 ± 0.47 | 2.8 ± 0.54 | 11.1 ± 1.01^ | 14.8 ± 1.22^†* |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 2.4 ± 0.42 | 2.2 ± 0.41 | 10.4 ± 0.78^ | 14.5 ± 1.17^* |
| Antegrade BV (cm/s) | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 11.3 ± 2.11 | 11.5 ± 1.63 | 21.6 ± 2.53^ | 21.5 ± 2.08^ |
| 40 mmHg | 8.6 ± 0.80 | 10.7 ± 2.25 | 19.1 ± 1.51^ | 21.0 ± 1.35^ |
| 60 mmHg | 9.8 ± 0.80ǂ | 10.1 ± 0.84ǂ | 19.8 ± 1.35^ | 21.4 ± 1.48^* |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 8.0 ± 0.40 | 8.6 ± 0.56 | 18.0 ± 1.03^ | 21.9 ± 1.65^* |
| Mean BV (cm/s) | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 8.7 ± 2.40 | 8.9 ± 1.92 | 11.6 ± 3.20^ | 10.5 ± 2.70* |
| 40 mmHg | 6.2 ± 1.01 | 8.4 ± 2.43 | 9.3 ± 2.04^ | 7.5 ± 1.54* |
| 60 mmHg | 7.0 ± 0.84 | 7.3 ± 1.01 | 8.8 ± 1.88 | 6.6 ± 1.77* |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 5.7 ± 0.54 | 6.4 ± 0.72 | 7.6 ± 1.12 | 7.4 ± 1.56 |
Values are means ± SE. BV = blood velocity. ^Significantly different versus baseline. †Significantly different versus exercise cuffed 20 mm Hg. *Significantly different versus control arm. ǂSignificantly different versus vitamin C trial.
Heart rate, brachial artery diameters, post-occlusion shear rate area under the curve, and post-occlusion time-to-peak
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | | | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 47 ± 2 | ― | 100 ± 3^† | ― | 60 ± 3^ | ― |
| 40 mmHg | 48 ± 2 | ― | 101 ± 2^† | ― | 55 ± 3^ | ― |
| 60 mmHg | 50 ± 2 | ― | 100 ± 2^† | ― | 57 ± 3^ | ― |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 48 ± 2 | ― | 100 ± 2^† | ― | 55 ± 2^ | ― |
| Diameters (mm) | | | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.2 ± 0.10 | 4.0 ± 0.08 | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.0 ± 0.07 | 4.1 ± 0.10* |
| 40 mmHg | 4.0 ± 0.07 | 4.1 ± 0.10 | 4.0 ± 0.08 | 4.1 ± 0.09 | 4.0 ± 0.10 | 4.2 ± 0.10* |
| 60 mmHg | 4.1 ± 0.10 | 4.1 ± 0.05 | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.1 ± 0.07 | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.2 ± 0.06* |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.1 ± 0.08 | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.1 ± 0.09 | 4.0 ± 0.09 | 4.1 ± 0.10 |
| SRauc (a.u.) | | | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 47.5 ± 3.69 | 57.4 ± 6.29* | ― | ― | 64.8 ± 8.43^ | 67.9 ± 9.58 |
| 40 mmHg | 45.5 ± 4.65 | 48.3 ± 5.22* | ― | ― | 57.2 ± 7.44^ | 56.7 ± 5.41^ |
| 60 mmHg | 45.7 ± 3.70 | 45.6 ± 3.91* | ― | ― | 72.6 ± 12.91^ | 60.9 ± 6.97^ |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 41.7 ± 3.37 | 54.0 ± 6.23* | ― | ― | 55.5 ± 6.14^ | 61.5 ± 7.01 |
| TTP (s) | | | | | | |
| 20 mmHg | 35.0 ± 2.13 | 38.5 ± 2.50 | ― | ― | 47.8 ± 5.40^ | 50.0 ± 5.83^ |
| 40 mmHg | 35.3 ± 2.84 | 36.5 ± 2.63 | ― | ― | 41.0 ± 3.74 | 40.5 ± 2.92 |
| 60 mmHg | 36.8 ± 2.31 | 34.5 ± 1.25 | ― | ― | 45.0 ± 4.55 | 40.5 ± 3.19 |
| 60 mmHg + Vit C | 35.8 ± 2.26 | 35.8 ± 2.00 | ― | ― | 41.5 ± 3.91 | 40.8 ± 3.86 |
Values are means ± SE. SRauc = shear rate area uncer the curve until peak dilation (arbitrary units). TTP = time-to-peak dilation. ^Significantly different versus baseline. *Significantly different versus control arm. †Significantly different versus post-exercise.
Figure 1 (A) Retrograde shear rate, (B) antegrade shear rate, (C) mean shear rate, and (D) oscillatory shear index for both arms in the 20 mm Hg, 40 mm Hg, 60 mm Hg, and 60 mm Hg + vitamin C supplementation. *Significantly different versus control arm. ^Significantly different versus baseline. †Significantly different versus 20 mmHg forearm cuffed arm.
Figure 2 FMD in both cuffed and control arms at baseline and post-exercise in the 20 mm Hg, 40 mm Hg, 60 mm Hg, and 60 mm Hg + vitamin C supplementation. *Significantly different versus post-exercise control arm. ^Significantly different versus baseline.