Literature DB >> 22880942

Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil in pediatric patients with hypertension.

Thomas G Wells1, Douglas L Blowey, Janice E Sullivan, Jeffrey Blumer, Joseph R Sherbotie, Saeheum Song, Shashank Rohatagi, Reinilde Heyrman, Daniel E Salazar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and importance of hypertension in younger patients is becoming increasingly recognized; however, only a limited number of clinical trials have been conducted in the pediatric population.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and short-term safety of olmesartan medoxomil in children and adolescents with hypertension.
METHODS: An open-label, multicenter, single-dose study was conducted in children and adolescents aged 12 months-16 years who were receiving treatment for hypertension or, if not currently treated for hypertension, had either a systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP).≥95th percentile, or SBP or DBP ≥90th percentile if diabetic or with a family history of hypertension. Patients were stratified by age: 12-23 months (Group 1; none enrolled), 2-5 years (Group 2; n = 4), 6-12 years (Group 3; n = 10), and 13-16 years (Group 4; n = 10). All patients received a single oral dose of olmesartan medoxomil based on the individual's age and bodyweight. Patients aged <6 years received an oral suspension of olmesartan medoxomil at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of bodyweight (not to exceed 20 mg), those aged ≥6 years who weighed ≥35 kg received olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg tablets, and those who weighed <35 kg received olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg tablets.
RESULTS: In Groups 2, 3, and 4, the weight-adjusted apparent total body clearance (CL/F) of olmesartan medoxomil was 0.100 ± 0.034, 0.062 ± 0.020, and 0.072 ± 0.022 L/h/kg, respectively, and the weight-adjusted apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) was 0.32 ± 0.16, 0.33 ± 0.14, and 0.49 ± 0.23 L/kg, respectively. CL/F and Vd/F in Groups 3 and 4 were not significantly different. Statistical comparisons between Groups 3 or 4 and Group 2 were not performed due to the small sample size of Group 2 (n = 4). Plasma elimination half-life and time to maximum plasma concentration were similar across the three groups. In Groups 3 and 4, considerable interindividual variability was seen in maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and apparent clearance, with AUC and C(max) approximately 30% greater in Group 3. Four of 24 (16.7%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events that were all mild in severity and considered not drug-related. No deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Olmesartan medoxomil was well tolerated and demonstrated a pharmacokinetic profile in pediatric patients similar to that of adults when adjusted for body size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00151814

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22880942     DOI: 10.2165/11631450-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Drugs        ISSN: 1174-5878            Impact factor:   3.022


  24 in total

1.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of valsartan in pediatrics.

Authors:  Bahru Habtemariam; William Sallas; Gangadhar Sunkara; Steven Kern; Venkateswar Jarugula; Goonaseelan Pillai
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.614

3.  Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan after administration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in separate dosage forms and as a fixed-dose combination.

Authors:  Shashank Rohatagi; James Lee; Magdy Shenouda; Stephen Haworth; Mohinder Singh Bathala; Mark Allison; Igor Rubets; Reinilde Heyrman; Robert Noveck; Daniel E Salazar
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine.

Authors:  G J Schwartz; G B Haycock; C M Edelmann; A Spitzer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A double-blind, dose-response study of the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in children and adolescents with hypertension.

Authors:  Lydie Hazan; Oscar A Hernández Rodriguez; As'ad E Bhorat; Koichi Miyazaki; Ben Tao; Reinilde Heyrman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  A double-blind, dose-response study of losartan in hypertensive children.

Authors:  Shahnaz Shahinfar; Francisco Cano; Beth A Soffer; Tuli Ahmed; Emanuela P Santoro; Zhongxin Zhang; Gilbert Gleim; Kenneth Miller; Beth Vogt; Jeffrey Blumer; Igor Briazgounov
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension.

Authors:  Beth Soffer; Zhongxin Zhang; Kenneth Miller; Beth A Vogt; Shahnaz Shahinfar
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Olmesartan medoxomil-based therapy for the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Mark Greathouse
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.045

10.  Blood pressure in children with chronic kidney disease: a report from the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children study.

Authors:  Joseph T Flynn; Mark Mitsnefes; Christopher Pierce; Steven R Cole; Rulan S Parekh; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  4 in total

1.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of azilsartan medoxomil in children and adolescents with hypertension as compared to healthy adults.

Authors:  Nicholas J A Webb; Thomas Wells; Max Tsai; Zhen Zhao; Attila Juhasz; Caroline Dudkowski
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Oral drug absorption in pediatrics: the intestinal wall, its developmental changes and current tools for predictions.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Nicolas; François Bouzom; Chanteux Hugues; Anna-Lena Ungell
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 3.  Advances in pediatric pharmacology, therapeutics, and toxicology.

Authors:  Daniel Gonzalez; Ian M Paul; Daniel K Benjamin; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  Adv Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-06

4.  A thorough QTc study demonstrates that olmesartan medoxomil does not prolong the QTc interval.

Authors:  Jeanne Mendell; Nobuko Matsushima; Terry E O'Reilly; James Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.126

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.