INTRODUCTION: This investigator-initiated study explores the safety, maximum tolerated dose, clinical response, and pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with and without erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS:Patients with prior clinical benefit from an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor were randomized to HCQ or HCQ plus erlotinib in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation schema. RESULTS:Twenty-seven patients were treated, eight with HCQ (arm A) and 19 withHCQ plus erlotinib (arm B). EGFR mutations were detected in 74% of the patients and 85% had received two or more prior therapies. Arm A had no dose-limiting toxicities, but the maximum tolerated dose was not reached as this arm closed early to increase overall study accrual. In arm B, one patient each experienced grade 3 rash, nail changes, skin changes, nausea, dehydration, and neutropenia; one had grade 4 anemia; and one developed fatal pneumonitis, all considered unrelated to HCQ. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, therefore the highest tested dose for HCQ with erlotinib 150 mg was 1000 mg daily. One patient had a partial response to erlotinib/HCQ, for an overall response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval, 1-25). This patient had an EGFR mutation and remained on therapy for 20 months. Administration of HCQ did not alter the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS:HCQ with or without erlotinib was safe and well tolerated. The recommended phase 2 dose of HCQ was 1000 mg when given in combination with erlotinib 150 mg.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: This investigator-initiated study explores the safety, maximum tolerated dose, clinical response, and pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with and without erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS:Patients with prior clinical benefit from an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor were randomized to HCQ or HCQ plus erlotinib in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation schema. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated, eight with HCQ (arm A) and 19 with HCQ plus erlotinib (arm B). EGFR mutations were detected in 74% of the patients and 85% had received two or more prior therapies. Arm A had no dose-limiting toxicities, but the maximum tolerated dose was not reached as this arm closed early to increase overall study accrual. In arm B, one patient each experienced grade 3 rash, nail changes, skin changes, nausea, dehydration, and neutropenia; one had grade 4 anemia; and one developed fatal pneumonitis, all considered unrelated to HCQ. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, therefore the highest tested dose for HCQ with erlotinib 150 mg was 1000 mg daily. One patient had a partial response to erlotinib/HCQ, for an overall response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval, 1-25). This patient had an EGFR mutation and remained on therapy for 20 months. Administration of HCQ did not alter the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS:HCQ with or without erlotinib was safe and well tolerated. The recommended phase 2 dose of HCQ was 1000 mg when given in combination with erlotinib 150 mg.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: H Khoury; K Trinkaus; M J Zhang; D Adkins; R Brown; R Vij; L T Goodnough; M K Ma; H L McLeod; S Shenoy; M Horowitz; J F Dipersio Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tino Munster; John P Gibbs; Danny Shen; Bruce A Baethge; Gary R Botstein; Jacques Caldwell; Fredrick Dietz; Robert Ettlinger; Harvey E Golden; Herbert Lindsley; George E McLaughlin; Larry W Moreland; W Neal Roberts; Theodore W Rooney; Bruce Rothschild; Marshall Sack; Anthony I Sebba; Michael Weisman; Kathryn E Welch; David Yocum; Daniel E Furst Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2002-06
Authors: Ming Zhao; Ping He; Michelle A Rudek; Manuel Hidalgo; Sharyn D Baker Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Andy Trotti; A Dimitrios Colevas; Ann Setser; Valerie Rusch; David Jaques; Volker Budach; Corey Langer; Barbara Murphy; Richard Cumberlin; C Norman Coleman; Philip Rubin Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Collin M Blakely; Evangelos Pazarentzos; Victor Olivas; Saurabh Asthana; Jenny Jiacheng Yan; Irena Tan; Gorjan Hrustanovic; Elton Chan; Luping Lin; Dana S Neel; William Newton; Kathryn L Bobb; Timothy R Fouts; Jeffrey Meshulam; Matthew A Gubens; David M Jablons; Jeffrey R Johnson; Sourav Bandyopadhyay; Nevan J Krogan; Trever G Bivona Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: H A Yu; C Sima; D Feldman; L L Liu; B Vaitheesvaran; J Cross; C M Rudin; M G Kris; W Pao; F Michor; G J Riely Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Yashpal S Chhonker; Richard L Sleightholm; Jing Li; David Oupický; Daryl J Murry Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Kenichi Suda; Paul A Bunn; Christopher J Rivard; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 15.609