Literature DB >> 22878118

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for adult craniospinal irradiation--a comparison with traditional techniques.

Matthew T Studenski1, Xinglei Shen, Yan Yu, Ying Xiao, Wenyin Shi, Tithi Biswas, Maria Werner-Wasik, Amy S Harrison.   

Abstract

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) poses a challenging planning process because of the complex target volume. Traditional 3D conformal CSI does not spare any critical organs, resulting in toxicity in patients. Here the dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are compared with classic conformal planning in adults for both cranial and spine fields to develop a clinically feasible technique that is both effective and efficient. Ten adult patients treated with CSI were retrospectively identified. For the cranial fields, 5-field IMRT and dual 356° VMAT arcs were compared with opposed lateral 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) fields. For the spine fields, traditional posterior-anterior (PA) PA fields were compared with isocentric 5-field IMRT plans and single 200° VMAT arcs. Two adult patients have been treated using this IMRT technique to date and extensive quality assurance, especially for the junction regions, was performed. For the cranial fields, the IMRT technique had the highest planned target volume (PTV) maximum and was the least efficient, whereas the VMAT technique provided the greatest parotid sparing with better efficiency. 3D-CRT provided the most efficient delivery but with the highest parotid dose. For the spine fields, VMAT provided the best PTV coverage but had the highest mean dose to all organs at risk (OAR). 3D-CRT had the highest PTV and OAR maximum doses but was the most efficient. IMRT provides the greatest OAR sparing but the longest delivery time. For those patients with unresectable disease that can benefit from a higher, definitive dose, 3D-CRT-opposed laterals are the most clinically feasible technique for cranial fields and for spine fields. Although inefficient, the IMRT technique is the most clinically feasible because of the increased mean OAR dose with the VMAT technique. Quality assurance of the beams, especially the junction regions, is essential.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22878118     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  7 in total

1.  Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in field junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT.

Authors:  Andrej Strojnik; Ignasi Méndez; Primož Peterlin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-28

2.  Practical dose delivery verification of craniospinal IMRT.

Authors:  Young K Lee; Anthony T Kim; Peiying Zhao; Aliaksandr Karotki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Evaluating the positional uncertainty of intrafraction, adjacent fields, and daily setup with the BrainLAB ExacTrac system in patients who are receiving craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Duan; Yibing Zhou; Hongya Dai; Lirong Zhao; Jindong Qian; Dingqiang Yang; Liwei Zhang; Can Luo; Guanghui Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Proton therapy for adult medulloblastoma: Acute toxicity and disease control outcomes.

Authors:  I-Chia Liu; Adam L Holtzman; Ronny L Rotondo; Daniel J Indelicato; Sridharan Gururangan; Robert Cavaliere; Bridgette Carter; Christopher G Morris; Daryoush Tavanaiepour; Michael S Rutenberg
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Collimator rotation in volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation and the dose distribution in the beam junction region.

Authors:  Qilin Li; Wendong Gu; Jinming Mu; Wenming Yin; Min Gao; Juncong Mo; Honglei Pei
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Radiotherapy for Adult Medulloblastoma: Evaluation of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy, and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and the Results of Helical Tomotherapy Therapy.

Authors:  Sun Zong-Wen; Yang Shuang-Yan; Du Feng-Lei; Cheng Xiao-Long; Li Qinglin; Chen Meng-Yuan; Hua Yong-Hong; Jin Ting; Hu Qiao-Ying; Chen Xiao-Zhong; Chen Yuan-Yuan; Chen Ming
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Pediatric craniospinal irradiation with a short partial-arc VMAT technique for medulloblastoma tumors in dosimetric comparison.

Authors:  Gerhard Pollul; Tilman Bostel; Sascha Grossmann; Sati Akbaba; Heiko Karle; Marcus Stockinger; Heinz Schmidberger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.