BACKGROUND: Instrumental variable (IV) methods can correct for unmeasured confounding when using administrative (claims) data for cardiovascular outcomes research, but difficulties identifying valid IVs have limited their use. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) for Medicare beneficiaries with acute coronary syndromes using the rapid uptake of DES in clinical practice as an instrument. We compared results from IV with those from propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression models. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study involving 62,309 fee-for-service beneficiaries 66 years and older treated with coronary stenting between May 2003 and February 2004. Outcomes were measured for 46 months after revascularization using claims data. RESULTS: Recipients of DES were younger, had a lower prevalence of myocardial infarction, and had fewer comorbidities compared with BMS recipients. Use of DES was associated with lower rates of mortality by PSM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, CI 0.77-0.83) but not by IV (HR 0.99, CI 0.87-1.11). Instrumental variable models estimated a larger reduction in repeat revascularization (HR 0.76, CI 0.63-0.89) than did PSM (HR 0.90, CI 0.87-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Based on IV analysis, the increased utilization of DES relative to BMS among Medicare beneficiaries with acute coronary syndrome is associated with reduced rates of repeat revascularization and no difference in mortality. Instrumental variable approaches provide a useful complement to conventional approaches to cardiovascular outcomes research with administrative data.
BACKGROUND: Instrumental variable (IV) methods can correct for unmeasured confounding when using administrative (claims) data for cardiovascular outcomes research, but difficulties identifying valid IVs have limited their use. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) for Medicare beneficiaries with acute coronary syndromes using the rapid uptake of DES in clinical practice as an instrument. We compared results from IV with those from propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression models. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study involving 62,309 fee-for-service beneficiaries 66 years and older treated with coronary stenting between May 2003 and February 2004. Outcomes were measured for 46 months after revascularization using claims data. RESULTS: Recipients of DES were younger, had a lower prevalence of myocardial infarction, and had fewer comorbidities compared with BMS recipients. Use of DES was associated with lower rates of mortality by PSM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, CI 0.77-0.83) but not by IV (HR 0.99, CI 0.87-1.11). Instrumental variable models estimated a larger reduction in repeat revascularization (HR 0.76, CI 0.63-0.89) than did PSM (HR 0.90, CI 0.87-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Based on IV analysis, the increased utilization of DES relative to BMS among Medicare beneficiaries with acute coronary syndrome is associated with reduced rates of repeat revascularization and no difference in mortality. Instrumental variable approaches provide a useful complement to conventional approaches to cardiovascular outcomes research with administrative data.
Authors: Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Yang Lei; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Paul S Chan; Joshua M Stolker; Kevin F Kennedy; Neal S Kleiman; David J Cohen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-10-11
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey J Popma; Peter J Fitzgerald; David R Holmes; Charles O'Shaughnessy; Ronald P Caputo; Dean J Kereiakes; David O Williams; Paul S Teirstein; Judith L Jaeger; Richard E Kuntz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-10-02 Impact factor: 91.245