Literature DB >> 22875770

New model for gain control of signal intensity to object distance in echolocating bats.

Ulrik Nørum1, Signe Brinkløv, Annemarie Surlykke.   

Abstract

Echolocating bats emit ultrasonic calls and listen for the returning echoes to orient and localize prey in darkness. The emitted source level, SL (estimated signal intensity 10 cm from the mouth), is adjusted dynamically from call to call in response to sensory feedback as bats approach objects. A logarithmic relationship of SL=20 log(10)(x), i.e. 6 dB output reduction per halving of distance, x, has been proposed as a model for the relationship between emitted intensity and object distance, not only for bats but also for echolocating toothed whales. This logarithmic model suggests that the approaching echolocator maintains a constant intensity impinging upon the object, but it also implies ever-increasing source levels with distance, a physical and biological impossibility. We developed a new model for intensity compensation with an exponential rise to the maximum source level: SL=SL(max)-ae(-)(bx). In addition to providing a method for estimating maximum output, the new model also offers a tool for estimating a minimum detection distance where intensity compensation starts. We tested the new exponential model against the 'conventional' logarithmic model on data from five bat species. The new model performed better in 77% of the trials and as good as the conventional model in the rest (23%). We found much steeper rates of compensation when fitting the model to individual rather than pooled data, with slopes often steeper than -20 dB per halving of distance. This emphasizes the importance of analyzing individual events. The results are discussed in light of habitat constraints and the interaction between bats and their eared prey.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875770     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.069427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Stereotypical rapid source level regulation in the harbour porpoise biosonar.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Laura N Kloepper; Magnus Wahlberg; Paul E Nachtigall
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-07-21

2.  Clutter and conspecifics: a comparison of their influence on echolocation and flight behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii.

Authors:  Kayleigh Fawcett; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Echolocating bats rely on an innate speed-of-sound reference.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cognitive adaptation of sonar gain control in the bottlenose dolphin.

Authors:  Laura N Kloepper; Adam B Smith; Paul E Nachtigall; John R Buck; James A Simmons; Aude F Pacini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Sonar beam dynamics in leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation.

Authors:  Tobias Budenz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.