Literature DB >> 22874679

A critical review of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Monisha Sudarshan1, Lorenzo Ferri.   

Abstract

The advent of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) attempts to decrease postoperative complications and mortality for this high-risk procedure. This review examines techniques in MIE, associated outcomes, and offers a critical appraisal of the literature surrounding this procedure. A Pubmed search was conducted for "minimally invasive esophagectomy" and associated synonyms. In addition, we analyze the outcomes at our institution through a prospectively maintained database. With varied techniques and utilization of different endpoints it is difficult to draw concrete conclusions from the current literature. Overall, however, there is no strong trend toward deceased mortality or decreased pulmonary complications from MIE, but there is a trend toward decreased intraoperative blood loss and shorter intensive care unit and ward stays. Until future studies are completed, MIE remains a useful tool in the armamentarium of the esophageal surgeon, and should be used not in exclusion of other approaches should patient or tumor factors dictate otherwise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22874679     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182582d2c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  8 in total

1.  Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Shiro Iwagami; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A North American Perspective.

Authors:  Philippe Bouchard; Juan-Carlos Molina; Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Jonathan Spicer; Carmen L Mueller; Lorenzo E Ferri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Current status of management of malignant disease: current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Jonathan Spicer; Lorenzo E Ferri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk factors and measures of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masaki Ohi; Yuji Toiyama; Yusuke Omura; Takashi Ichikawa; Hiromi Yasuda; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Yoshiki Okita; Shigeyuki Yoshiyama; Junichiro Hiro; Toshimitsu Araki; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Operative Details in Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Surgical Approach, Lymphadenectomy, Anastomosis.

Authors:  Ralf Metzger; Frank Schütze; Stefan Mönig
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2015-10-14

6.  Totally mechanical linear stapled anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Operative technique and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Hui-Jiang Gao; Ju-Wei Mu; Wei-Min Pan; Malcolm Brock; Mao-Long Wang; Bin Han; Kai Ma
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Technical details of video-assisted transcervical mediastinal dissection for esophageal cancer and its perioperative outcome.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Mori; Susumu Aikou; Koichi Yagi; Masato Nishida; Takashi Mitsui; Yukinori Yamagata; Hiroharu Yamashita; Sachiyo Nomura; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-08-14

8.  Factors during training which predict future use of minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Paul E Rothenberg; Byron D Hughes; Farshad Amirkhosravi; Bless P Onaiwu; Ikenna C Okereke
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.